Can a marriage survive without a child? - Page 2

I know hubby wife married 40 years or 60 years without kids or their only kid died before 10 years of marraige and they live alone

marraige does not really require kids to survive

you do not think i will marry to have kids you may not have kids after marraige at all

anyways nowadays kids only stay till 16 years than move out after that its hubby wife alone usually all life with a few days visit by kids every year thats all

only fools will think kids are needed to make marraige success its patriarchal thoughts

marriage is much more than bringing up kids

its caring support companionship being together in illness apain loss grief etc

anupama never understood this she left anuj alone in his every illness grief pain and enjoying with shahs

Forget a wife not even neighbour or friend will leave an anuj alone in such conditions

Originally posted by: MOTHERHOOD

Leela was abusive toward Hashmukh, but, Hasmukh never divorced her as she was the mother of his child.

Vanraj emotionally tortured Anupamaa, but, she still stayed in that marriage because Vanraj was a good father to her kids.

A powerful woman like Rakhi Dave tolerated her jobless philander husband because she had a child with him.

An educated working woman is staying with her disloyal husband as he fathered her daughter.

MaAn's marriage fell apart the moment CA left them.

A relationship, no matter how much toxic it is, will survive if it is supported by a child, but a relationship, no matter how perfect it is, will die without a child. Can a couple only stay together if they have a child? Are spouses only a means to get children? Does the importance of a spouse fade without a child?

No see in india its thought that marriage is eternal permanent even hubby or wife bad nibah ke chalo

I know highly educated earning lakhs or crores per year still suffering with wife or hubby because indian mentality do not divorce (and many work in USA/europe not in india also)

I know cases where kids are saying papa mama divorce but they cannot as family putting pressure ke bahiskar kar denge famiy or relatives circle se - they will be bhaishkar for divorcing from social circles or family or relatives circle not called for any functions etc not allowed to participate in wedding rituals of others

They cry with friends but dare not leave wife or hubby and suffer because society and their parents or family will not accept a divorce

The reason rakhi or kinjal or kavya are not divorcing is society only what society says?

Look at malvika she left her abusive hubby she had no pressure of parents grand parents or relatives who would say niabh ke chalo only anuj who was modern and did not force her stay with hubby so she left easily. Also she live in USA not india so single women not targetted in USA as much as india. People think in india single woman is available for all sab fayda utah tah even family members

In india parents and grandparents and uncle auntys relatives basically interfere a lot in life even for 40 or 50 year olds - like do not dress like this do not divorce do not do this that. ek zanjeer han ye rishte that do not allow people to live inp peace even in old age - log mainly family relatives neighbours kya kahenge and bahiskhar are two reasons many not divorce

If you live in india even at 40 or 50 year old especially a woman parents in laws uncle aunty will comment if you wear modern dress i saw - they need permission no matter they are BE, MBA, PHD but parents, in laws, relatives will interfere even in dress etc and dictate or comment. Than imagine divorce if they decide to take what all parent, in laws and relatives will do?

Like anuj kapadiya or rakhi dave aadmi dab ke reh jathe hain gut gut ke spouse ke saath

Is it a suprise than that india is 130-140 place in happiness index in world

Kyunki freedom hi nahi milta jeene ke liye apne isaab se even dress you cannot wear or hair you cannot cut or slipper you cannot wear of your choice sab comment kaarthe hain

Forget other aspects