Originally posted by: atominis
I have seen Hindus themselves make cheap jokes on Shivaling and treat it as a phallic symbol or talk shit about relation of Shiva, Parvati, Vishnu, Lakshmi, Brahma, Saraswati or call Ram a bad husband or say no woman should get a husband like Ram (there are some folk songs about fate of Sita and agnipariksha, and how no woman should meet fate of Sita).
I have seen the term Hawas ka pujari used most by Hindus.
Hindus also joke about Kaamsutra and various temples whose wall art and sculptures, carvings show sexual poses.
And Hindus themselves call own rituals a waste of time, money and too tedious and joke even about Rakhi.
Rakhi and term bhaiya are reduced to jokes. That you celebrate Raksha bandhan but not Valentine or 'bane rahe bhaiya, kabhi na bane saiyaan' or using Rakhi as a way to tease boys and boys hating that day and avoiding girls then and even older teachers saying they will get girls to tie Rakhi to boys.
Like why joke even about a festival that celebrates bond of siblings and why shame someone for being seen as a brother or sister?
As long as Hindus do not correct own ways and mock own self, they cannot blame others or films for showing them a particular way.
I have seen women with anger issues being called Kali roop or Chandi roop. Huh? Chandi did not have merely temper issues. The anger and destruction caused by Kali or Chandi have specific cause behind it. Hindus demean own deities and legends if they use such references.
I do not see Sikhs with anger issues compare self to Guru Gobind Singh for eg.
So we need to have no go zones, draw the line somewhere and draw boundaries.
Few years ago, during an election campaign, Sidhu had compared himself to Guru Gobind Singh and his aides also used the title 'Mard Agamra' for him, which was originally a title used to address Guru Gobind Singh in honour for his warrior skills. He was ripped apart for it and had to apologise to Sikhs and Akal Takht for this and warned never to compare self to Gurus or use any word for self, which is used for Gurus.
You do not see Hindus object to own random people comparing self to gods.
How easily people call Lata an embodiment of Saraswati or an avatar of her? Or a politician had compared Indira Gandhi to Durga after 1971 war. Or someone ended up saying Modi is an avatar of Kalki? Why?
We should know where to draw the line.
I am also against Hindus making cartoons and toys or dolls on own gods. How can one reduce Hanuman or Ganpati to toons or plush toys? If you learn to play with something what reverance will you have for it? If you reduce deities to TV or film characters or comics, tattoos, cartoons you will gradually see casual behaviour and lack of respect.
There are reasons why Muslims and Sikhs do not allow toons or serials on Prophet or Gurus nor allow actors to play Prophet or Gurus. Unlike Hindus who have allowed anything and now we have fools who even fall at feet of Arun Govil and Nitish Bharadwaj or Mohit Raina and Saurabh Raj Jain, seeking their blessings or invite them at ceremonies or ask them to speak on gods or debate gods like characters of a novel or write fan fiction re imagining own gods without bothering about respect (for eg, wanting to imagine romantic relation with Draupadi and Krishna).
I know BJP and RSS use such references and controversies but I would not mind if ordinary Hindu showed some spine and self introspection too. You do not need to do what other communities do but you do not need to be so casual about own faith either.
This is just an extension of your previous post which i already agreed to.
The problem is if Hindus partake in such jokes or don't take offense then the fault is their's as they have no self respect. If they do take offense abd stand up for self and community respect they are termed intolerant and hindutvavadis (as if its a bad thing).
What to do? Any suggestion?

1