Katha Ankahee -- #11 daily episode DT - Page 35

Incidentally, isn’t it absurd that when Katha’s worry was at an unimaginable peak when Aarav was sick, she did not show it at all in her demeanor at work & no one suspected she was worried. But now when she is worried about Dodo (which surely is not same level worry), it is so apparent in her manner that Viaan can spot it right away?

CVs think we are dumber than Reet & Meera put together 😡

"first one lady came claiming daughter. now you are coming, are you the son-in-law?????" --- the eldest Dson cracks me up. your snark attacks are too good angry young man! 😆

poor viaan's servants -- it seems viaan and co play holi inside the house. who cleans up the mess? 🤣

Originally posted by: Nabni_blr31

Just watched the episode on insta . I totally get it why there was no discussion about the episode.

It was a maha boring episode. If it goes like this even i would give up. They hv stretched everything like a chewing gum. Ab toh yeh bhi pata hei ki kaunsa character kya dialogue bolega,kaise react karega and all. All the dialogues and scenes are so repetitive 😡even i can tell how Reet is gonna react seeing Katha,how Yuvraj will lie, how nighty mama will react😡

Makers ,we get it that your ML and FL are great human beings. We have accepted it. So can u pls stop it here and move on. Pls show us some progress in story.

The whole week was wasted on Dodo and her pathetic sons. 😡 Today Viaan lecturing about how to respect your mother was so 😵 sorry par pasie dekar respect kaun kharidta hei.

Sorry for my rant. But i am so angry after watching the episode.

viaan is a total idiot. it was bakwas hearing his respect speech. plus I do think there is more to this story

like I mentioned in my law rant in mili's thread yesterday, the boys have a legal right to their inheritance. on what basis is she denying them? based on how fast the boys agreed to this stupid deal, it seems they are in need of money. otherwise, no one agrees to installment because you never know whether you will get the full amount. so the fact these boys agreed without consulting a lawyer for a measly monthly salary indicates there is far more going on underneath.

Not clear whether the sons have

(a) directly inherited the land & some consent is needed fm Neerja to sell it (in which case they can go to court if she is unreasonably withholding consent) OR

(b) it is is the name of mum & both sons (in which case they cannot sell without consent of all owners) OR

(c) it is in Neerja’s name & they inherit in due course (in which case they do not have any legal right as long as she is alive, she can hold it or dispose of it as she wishes & they cannot legally dispute - unless she is of unsound mind)

Originally posted by: Bana

Not clear whether the sons have

(a) directly inherited the land & some consent is needed fm Neerja to sell it (in which case they can go to court if she is unreasonably withholding consent) OR

(b) it is is the name of mum & both sons (in which case they cannot sell without consent of all owners) OR

(c) it is in Neerja’s name & they inherit in due course (in which case they do not have any legal right as long as she is alive, she can hold it or dispose of it as she wishes & they cannot legally dispute - unless she is of unsound mind)

the narrative is all over the place and so it could be either of these options. what she said was that she and husband bought the land but it was in legal dispute. after the court case was over, she wanted to follow her dreams and sons said no. so this conflict has been going on for some time. if the husband passed away before the court case was resolved, then the property would have come into the name of all 3 because they are all legal heirs. that is my understanding. viaan said he was buying their rights to neeraji's land -- so am going with option B

Originally posted by: Bana

Not clear whether the sons have

(a) directly inherited the land & some consent is needed fm Neerja to sell it (in which case they can go to court if she is unreasonably withholding consent) OR

(b) it is is the name of mum & both sons (in which case they cannot sell without consent of all owners) OR

(c) it is in Neerja’s name & they inherit in due course (in which case they do not have any legal right as long as she is alive, she can hold it or dispose of it as she wishes & they cannot legally dispute - unless she is of unsound mind)

The land was in Neerja's husband name and it was stuck in some court case. Her husband died when the court case is solved so legal owner is his wife. Until the wife is alive, children can't claim property.

I want to see these 2 chaps on the street. I feel strongly about greedy ungrateful kids getting a reality check.

Originally posted by: LAV2725

Felt Sony & PH have controlled over exposure of KA on shoot bts/segments in media in Feb month, but come March seems back to square one.🤔

Majority of this weeks scenes even before scheduled episodic telecast are out for us to watch, 😎as usual there's not much excitement left to wait n watch actual episode at 8.30pm. Added this weeks KA plots are mostly revolving around unconvincing sad story of youthful Neerja & her over grown selfish sons.😕 Even Holi focus is on solving her issues.

What's in store for next week? hope they go back to Pyramid vs Earthcon Lonavala project bidding or Rajasthan project? how Viaan knows about batman Aarav?.what ever is in store, its wise if they limit KA bts/segments release in media.

bts/segments were all over the place, also one of the reasons why this weeks episodes didn't create much anticipation to watch or deliberate upon..😔

Originally posted by: Neutral2

The land was in Neerja's husband name and it was stuck in some court case. Her husband died when the court case is solved so legal owner is his wife. Until the wife is alive, children can't claim property.

I was wrong, now I remember the home is in my name too with my siblings and mother since my father died before the registry of home so we all have to do.