Originally posted by: KJasoosChulbulP
this isn’t called setting a narrative. No “intelligent man” as people claim he is will let a gal near an accused man in same room. 100 cameras or not. And as Sallu says. We don’t make the footage. HMs do. We only comment on what they do.And this man proved he can do anything to anyone for his own gain. Simple….
and if that’s not the case. Why be against chanchaa gang. They should be deserving winners as they always do what sajjo wants. In front of cameras also 🤣🤣🤣🤣. And why have any problems with sajjo ka accusations. But ignore the same ones when it comes to Ankit. Now that’s called setting a narrative. Ignore what Ankit does despite sajjo ka kand. But talk about sanjo ka kand in all other contexts as if it’s horrible 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Your 2nd paragraph is totally lost on me because unlike most, I don't bring their domestic violence or Me2 for my convenience in my arguments. I am mostly judging them on their game IN THE house and rarely refer to outside matters.
I can't be a hypocrite watching this show and going around sitting on a moral high horse calling Sajid out Me too , me too everywhere. If I have so much problem and disgust at it, I'll stop watching it not take both my entertainment and convenient morality and use it to back my arguments.
@bold: And I feel it's a narrative because you go Queen Silbatta even after physical violence on national tv by brushing her deed under " yes she was wrong but..." entertains, speaks truth daringly sometimes, goes against Sajid?... whatever. But conveniently brushed aside.
Ankit has his share of massive faults but trying SO hard to equate his deeds to an actual offender like Sajid? When actual offense above was easily forgotten?
If that can fly, so can Ankit's. That's all I am saying.
