Anupamas and Shahs hypocrisy

Anupama madam who gives lectures on woman equality etc are very double standard in reality

She has problem with adhik pakhi in a hotel room together

First of all when college students go on picnic many people stay in same bedroom do they only sleep together? from both genders in india only

Or when It company travel to USA/UK they take one house live together boys and girls. So are you implying staying in one house or bedroom means they are sleeping together (in wrong way)

Also why vanraj went to mumbai alone with Malvika on business tour? Where they sharing a room as they loved each other(vanraj was playing games)

What if vanraj spent night with Malvika and made her videos. How this thought never occured to anupama about vanraj taking advantage of depressed malvika

What was toshu doing with sanjana in hotel in rajkot alone? What if he took videos and circulated MMS

What if Toshu and Samar took pictures of kinjal and nandini before wedding. Were they not roaming around with these girls before marraige

When it comes to own daughter all men are bad

When it comes to thers sisters read Malvika or others daughters read rakhis kinjal or sanjana or kavyas nandini its ok if her hubby and sons do anything

Atleast adhik is decent enough not to touch pakhi without consent unlike vanraj and toshu

Did vanraj really love malvika no he wanted to trap her for kapaida empire ownership and her wealth that time anupama was saying hes not ghatiya insaan when all could see including Baa and kavya wht was going on and were worried

Now toshu has anger issues not affair with sanjana

Why these double standards for kapadia related men and one for shahs anupama madam

Barkha can say that pakhi is trapping adhik because hes USA returned and anuj relative so pakhi after anuj wealth and status too and shes not wrong too

Adhik may have bad intentions but so does pakhi so why should we symapthize with pakhi only not adhik

Even lowest and worst human may not want relation with a shah kind of family in society who have multiple affairs abuse women try to snatch others wealth target others sisters and daughters and leave them at will etc

Why make only adhik as villan when pakhi has similar intentions to date adhik?

In real world may women to target and marry a rich man for his wealth even if he has a wife and kids etc when they can actually get anyone whose single

If anupam atruly was for women safety she would speak against vanraj for malvika sake and speak against toshu for sanjana sake

what is this shameless kinjal MBA roaming with her betrayed husband family on trips so shamelessly just a few days after her hubby had affair with sanjana.

No one in serila has any self respect or what after anuj this kinjal joined list

In real world no normal woman betrayed by hubby will go on trips with hubby family so soon

I am disappointed with kinjal and rakhi too

Anupama's worldview is pretty narrow. While shahs are just horrible people.

Difference between vanraj and malvika and pakhi ahd adhik .

In malvika and vanraj every body know that malvika is going with vanraj to Mumbai for project to vanraj every body know ki vanraj aur malvika saath saath Mumbai jaa Rahe hai to vanraj ka video banana aur malvika ko blackmailing karne ka sawal nahi Hota. Vanraj agar video banana to isme vanraj hi phasta kyonki sabhi ko Pata Hota ki vanraj hi malvika ke saath tha .

But yahsn koi nahi jaanta tha ki pakhi aur adhik ek hotel room mein hai agar adhik ne pakhi ki aisi photo kheech ke viral black mail Kar diya Hota to then how pakhi will proove eh sub adhik ne kiya aur woh mujhe blackmail Kar rsha Hai

Pakhi kisi kisi ko kaise yakeen dilati to ki use black mail Kiya jaa raha hai

Atleast jhooth nahi bolti pakhi agar pakhi Sach bolti ki hum adhik ke pass jaa Rahe hai to Atleast pakhi ke saath agar black mailing hoti to anupama ke pass pakhi ke.supporrt mein ladne a proof to Hota anupama witness khada sakti thi yes adhik pakhi ke saath affair kar raha tha aur usi ne pakhi ka video bananaya aur blackmailing Kar raha hai

Aaj Jo anupama ka Jo main issue tha that is pakhi ne jhooth bola aur doosra anupama is baat issue ta ki agar bade banne ka itna hi shauk hai to badon ki Tarah responsibility bhi Lena seekho .

Jub anupama ne bola pakhi ko tumhe apni marji karni hai gai tum badi ho gayi go tum khuch bhi kar sakti ho to jaao apni responsibility bhi lo phir mother father Har choti choti cheej ke liye kyon depend ho then why pakhi did not say anything but pakhi kept quiet when anupama ask pakhi do whatever u want as u r adult being adult take responsibility too don't depend on parents for life time

Other difference is that in case of kinjal and toshu and samar and Nandini none of these lie to their parents everybody know they are meeting with each other

And also being in romance kinjal toshu samar Nandini still thinking about career and Completing their study

Yeh sub log zindagi bhar apne parents pe depend nahi rehne wale they for their bread butter

Toshu aur kinjal to aisi itni jaldi shaadi bhi nahe karte agar rakhi ne yeh nahi Kaha Hota ki kinjal ko USA mein le jaaksr doosre ladke se shaadi kar wayegi

But in padhik case they are just lying not even taken responsibility not thinking about career bus unhe anuj ka paisa use karke life enjoy Karni Hai sochte hai ki jub Anuj ke paisa se kaam chal raha to kyon kamayrin kyon padhai kare

Originally posted by: surabhi01

Difference between vanraj and malvika and pakhi ahd adhik .

In malvika and vanraj every body know that malvika is going with vanraj to Mumbai for project to vanraj every body know ki vanraj aur malvika saath saath Mumbai jaa Rahe hai to vanraj ka video banana aur malvika ko blackmailing karne ka sawal nahi Hota. Vanraj agar video banana to isme vanraj hi phasta kyonki sabhi ko Pata Hota ki vanraj hi malvika ke saath tha .

But yahsn koi nahi jaanta tha ki pakhi aur adhik ek hotel room mein hai agar adhik ne pakhi ki aisi photo kheech ke viral black mail Kar diya Hota to then how pakhi will proove eh sub adhik ne kiya aur woh mujhe blackmail Kar rsha Hai

Pakhi kisi kisi ko kaise yakeen dilati to ki use black mail Kiya jaa raha hai

Atleast jhooth nahi bolti pakhi agar pakhi Sach bolti ki hum adhik ke pass jaa Rahe hai to Atleast pakhi ke saath agar black mailing hoti to anupama ke pass pakhi ke.supporrt mein ladne a proof to Hota anupama witness khada sakti thi yes adhik pakhi ke saath affair kar raha tha aur usi ne pakhi ka video bananaya aur blackmailing Kar raha hai

Aaj Jo anupama ka Jo main issue tha that is pakhi ne jhooth bola aur doosra anupama is baat issue ta ki agar bade banne ka itna hi shauk hai to badon ki Tarah responsibility bhi Lena seekho .

Jub anupama ne bola pakhi ko tumhe apni marji karni hai gai tum badi ho gayi go tum khuch bhi kar sakti ho to jaao apni responsibility bhi lo phir mother father Har choti choti cheej ke liye kyon depend ho then why pakhi did not say anything but pakhi kept quiet when anupama ask pakhi do whatever u want as u r adult being adult take responsibility too don't depend on parents for life time

@bold: Pakhi ko kisi ko yakeen dilane ki jaroorat nahi hai. She can straight away go to police and seek legal help. All she needs to do is write an email to her local cyber cell, with proof of blackmailing and/or leaked videos. Indian IT Act ke under yeh situation covered hai.

IT Act Section 66E: Any person intentionally captures, publishes, or transmits image of private area of any person without consent, then he shall be liable to pay penalty upto Rs.2,00,000/-, or Imprisonment upto 3 years, or both.

IT Act Section 67A: Any person publishes, or transmits in electronic form any material which contains sexually explicit act, or conduct, then he shall be liable to pay penalty upto Rs.10,00,000/-, or Imprisonment upto 5 years, or both, And in the event of second or subsequent conviction, he shall be liable to pay penalty upto Rs.10,00,000/-, or Imprisonment upto 7 years, or both.

Indian Penal Code, 1860, section-354C: Viewing and/or capturing the image of a girl or woman going about her private acts, where she thinks that no one is watching her is a crime. This includes a woman, using a toilet, or who is undressed or in her underwear, or engaged in a sexual act. He shall be punished on first conviction with imprisonment of either description for a term which shall not be less than one year, but which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine, and be punished on a second or subsequent conviction, with imprisonment of either description for a term which shall not be less than three years, but which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.

Blackmail kaun kar raha hai iska pata lagana police ka kaam hai, na ki Anupamaa ya Pakhi ya kisi aur ka. And even if Pakhi consented to recording their act and Adhik leaks them then too he will be punished according above laws. He would have rigourous imprisionment for at least 7 years.

For people who don't live in India, there was recently an incident at Chandigarh University Girls Hostel. A girl recorded videos of her hostelmates' private activities by placing a hidden camera is the bathroom. There are several cases of placing hidden cameras in hostels, hotel rooms, trial rooms etc. We don't stop going to hotels and malls because of that.

PS. The aim of this comment was spread awareness about the rights granted to you by law. If you or someone you know finds themselves in such situation, please be strong and approach police. All laws except the last one are gender-neutral and are applicable even if the victim is a man.

Originally posted by: surabhi01

Difference between vanraj and malvika and pakhi ahd adhik .

In malvika and vanraj every body know that malvika is going with vanraj to Mumbai for project to vanraj every body know ki vanraj aur malvika saath saath Mumbai jaa Rahe hai to vanraj ka video banana aur malvika ko blackmailing karne ka sawal nahi Hota. Vanraj agar video banana to isme vanraj hi phasta kyonki sabhi ko Pata Hota ki vanraj hi malvika ke saath tha .

But yahsn koi nahi jaanta tha ki pakhi aur adhik ek hotel room mein hai agar adhik ne pakhi ki aisi photo kheech ke viral black mail Kar diya Hota to then how pakhi will proove eh sub adhik ne kiya aur woh mujhe blackmail Kar rsha Hai

Pakhi kisi kisi ko kaise yakeen dilati to ki use black mail Kiya jaa raha hai

Atleast jhooth nahi bolti pakhi agar pakhi Sach bolti ki hum adhik ke pass jaa Rahe hai to Atleast pakhi ke saath agar black mailing hoti to anupama ke pass pakhi ke.supporrt mein ladne a proof to Hota anupama witness khada sakti thi yes adhik pakhi ke saath affair kar raha tha aur usi ne pakhi ka video bananaya aur blackmailing Kar raha hai

Aaj Jo anupama ka Jo main issue tha that is pakhi ne jhooth bola aur doosra anupama is baat issue ta ki agar bade banne ka itna hi shauk hai to badon ki Tarah responsibility bhi Lena seekho .

Jub anupama ne bola pakhi ko tumhe apni marji karni hai gai tum badi ho gayi go tum khuch bhi kar sakti ho to jaao apni responsibility bhi lo phir mother father Har choti choti cheej ke liye kyon depend ho then why pakhi did not say anything but pakhi kept quiet when anupama ask pakhi do whatever u want as u r adult being adult take responsibility too don't depend on parents for life time

see shahs have different rules for daughter pakhi and her love

they have different rules for toshu and samar

hence pakhi hiding from shahs and anupama

you saw how like a anupama went and sat in hotel with adhik and pakhi when they were having cofeee

Did anupama follow toshu or samar to college and see how many women they are roaming with in hotel or taking to hotel rooms bunking classes

Anupama was not bothered why because they are boys

anupamas sons can roam with others daughters and take their vdeos use them do anything

what if kinjal or nandini had got pregnant or toshu samar had made their videos and blackmailed them ohhh i forgot kinjal and nandini are not her daughters or blood or shahs so its ok anything happen with them as they are others daughters no same with mukku anupama was justifying saying vanraj not ghatiya admi and let affair bloom for months without telling anuj or GK or warning malvika etc. Anupama will not bother about sara too anuj neice as shes not her blood or sanjana too who are they some others daughters and sisters. Only her daughter should be safe and virgin and not roam with any boy. Her hubby and sons can do anything with others daughters no problem for anupama she will support shah men

This is nothing but double standards

why did anupam athan go against rakhi and marry kinjal to toshu. Than rakhi was in anupama place and kinjal in pakhi situation no. Rakhi told no kinjal should not marry toshu why anupama like village head or court judge married them when pakhi was against it. Oh i forgot one rule for anupama the mother another rule for rakhi the mother or anuj the brother or kavya the massi etc their daughters are not so important as pakhi shah the great as they are not anupamas daughters blood daughters ohhh i forgot again

same way barkha has right to go against shah and marry pakhi to adhik like anupama did against rakhi will. Just send kinjal back to rakhi house if toshu ran off with kinjal no. but no great anupama has to destroy others daughters life by marrying them to her third class sons. I would not have been suprised f anupama would have allowed vanraj to divorce kavya and marry malvika if malvika said yes going against anuj and GK because Mukkus lover is Mr. Shah the great.

toshu married kinjal because of her mothers property and business only he never loves her nooo everyone can see that from a year only that hes only after her riches not any love shove

same way anupama has no right to preach adhik as her sons are sour grapes targeting others daughters

chit bhi meri phat bhi meri nahi hota anupama

your sons (and 26 year hubby) can roam with girls and do whatever in hotels etc with many woman before after marraige you will still say they are good and support them against own wife and lovers

but others sons cannot dare even see your daughter or what

adhik atleast did not force her for anything to sleep etc in resort means adhik is much better human than any shah male.

when your husband and sons are roaming and sleeping with others daughters you close your eyes like sati savitri and say its anger issue of toshu its true love of vanraj and kavya its samar right to break engagementto enagement etc its ok for toshu to betray sanjana its ok vanraj not ghatiya mukku is ghatiya may be than for having affair with vanraj

when its your daughter you cry wolf is it? who will have any sympathy for you or believe you because same rules do not apply for your 26 year old husband and 2 sons

Sorry to say we do not know what vanraj told malvika in chats that she came running after 10 years to india suddenly he must have told her day dreams like toshu told sanjan afor her to spend few days with him in hotel. Luckily anuj was there with an own apartment and ensured she was never alone with vanraj in ahmedabad atleast so vanraj never took advantage of her so many months. God only knows what happened in Mumbai. I seriously want malvika suing vanraj and betraying her by hidding hes 50 plus with 2 wives etc while he trapped her online.

Same with sanjana

Originally posted by: surabhi01

Other difference is that in case of kinjal and toshu and samar and Nandini none of these lie to their parents everybody know they are meeting with each other

And also being in romance kinjal toshu samar Nandini still thinking about career and Completing their study

Yeh sub log zindagi bhar apne parents pe depend nahi rehne wale they for their bread butter

Toshu aur kinjal to aisi itni jaldi shaadi bhi nahe karte agar rakhi ne yeh nahi Kaha Hota ki kinjal ko USA mein le jaaksr doosre ladke se shaadi kar wayegi

But in padhik case they are just lying not even taken responsibility not thinking about career bus unhe anuj ka paisa use karke life enjoy Karni Hai sochte hai ki jub Anuj ke paisa se kaam chal raha to kyon kamayrin kyon padhai kare

pakhi adhik is very similar to toshu kinjal only except adhik is 30 year old who finished education in usa and can work

toshu was still mba when he made love drama with kinjal

toshu loved kinjal for rakhi money

adhik loves pakhi to get close to anuj business thats all diff

in future adhik may have affair like toshu after wedding too who knows

atleast now hes decent boy who never forced pakhi to sleep in resort

Originally posted by: Loveforworld

Anupama's worldview is pretty narrow. While shahs are just horrible people.

true most shah men have used and destroyed other women life

like anupama, kavya, kinjal, nandini, malvika

how can anyone support this shah family and anupama is mystery

they have no morals or values or anything

Anupama has given equal treatment to all her children .anupama use to give coffee to toshu in his study room way same way anupama use to give sandwich chocolate milk shake to pakhi

Aisa kabhi nshi hua ki anupama coffee Bana le toshu ko deti ho aur pakhi ko kehti ho ki apna sandwich chocolate milk shake khud banaao

Anupama ne toshu se koi Ghar ka kaam nahi ksrwaya to anupama ne pakhi se pakhi se bhi Ghar ka kaam nahi kar waya

Anupama slap toshu when toshu come drunkard and even rebuke him for insulting family and rebuke him when he cheated kinjal and anupama scold pakhi about lieng to family

So where is question of anupama gender bias

Leela is gender bias but anupama is definitely not gender bias

No argument will stand ground.

1. None has a locus standi in case of Pakhi-Adhik.

Are they both adult? Was there consent? Period.

2. Regarding could have done things, would have done things. The same argument goes for Kinjal- Paritosh, Paritosh-Sanjana, Samar-Nandini, Vanraj-Malavika even Vanraj-Kavya.

It's not about being caught, it's about having the intentions. Agar aisa kuch kar dete toh koi kya ukhad leta? The damage would have been done regardless, right.

Everyone suspected/knew Vanraj's intentions (just like everyone suspects Adhik's intentions) with Malavika, kya kar liya sabne?