PS1 trailer - OUT NOW!!! - Page 6

Hmm. The trailer didn't have as much "chutzpah" as I was expecting. But I am still curious about this project.

This closeup was breathtaking. OMG

Their timing is terrible. They should have waited till Monday when the fate of Brahmastra would have been decided one way or the other. All the "VFX" nay-saying on Youtube wants me to support the movie even further. Really? That's all we should look for on a trailer? This is not Avengers or Transformers or even Bahubali.😒

I love it! It's a Mani Ratnam film so I'm expecting good music and stunning visuals. If the reviews are good will definitely catch the movie in theatre.

Aish is looking so ethereal in the trailer.

the scale and visuals look aesthetic, execution of the script will be key now, though my sense it may meander with some high points

was disappointed with karthi, expected much better performance, maybe will be better in movie, even tamil diction was not great, very modern like

trisha looks lovely, vikram was also good, ravi less said better,

aish looks good but was dubbed by suhasini i guess who will do a good job, but I cant understand dubbing in this day and age, why cant they learn the language, she has been acting since her debut days in tamil, especially for such a stellar role one has to put the effort

when jr ntr, ramcharan and dulquer can do dubbing in 4 languages

nowadays stakes are high

have to give alia also credit, she has learnt telugu though she didnt dub (atleast her first role and it was 5 mins) but she sang well in the brahamstra function

both tel and hindi version overall dubbing is bad, they should have taken more care

anil's voice didnt suit, not sure why Big B was not approached, rana voice was good in tel, he has great diction

Originally posted by: vcs17

the scale and visuals look aesthetic, execution of the script will be key now, though my sense it may meander with some high points

was disappointed with karthi, expected much better performance, maybe will be better in movie, even tamil diction was not great, very modern like

trisha looks lovely, vikram was also good, ravi less said better,

aish looks good but was dubbed by suhasini i guess who will do a good job, but I cant understand dubbing in this day and age, why cant they learn the language, she has been acting since her debut days in tamil, especially for such a stellar role one has to put the effort

when jr ntr, ramcharan and dulquer can do dubbing in 4 languages

nowadays stakes are high

have to give alia also credit, she has learnt telugu though she didnt dub (atleast her first role and it was 5 mins) but she sang well in the brahamstra function

both tel and hindi version overall dubbing is bad, they should have taken more care

anil's voice didnt suit, not sure why Big B was not approached, rana voice was good in tel, he has great diction

I think it looks pretty good.

Originally posted by: Lord_Voldemort

It’s not just Tamil, it’s an ancient Tamil spoken thousand years ago. I’m sure she would have if Mani insisted. But I guess he didn’t for a reason.

It’s actually Alia so could have dubbed for herself because she barely had a couple of lines in the entire film. Plus that film was only set around a 100-150 years ago.

It doesnt matter whether the language is ancient or modern, an actor does what the role requires, that is their job

if Karthi and jayam ravi, trisha can do it then why not her, they are also speaking the same ancient tamil

if not RRR then what about baahubali

ramya krishna, prabhas and rana did dubbing, that was anicient telugu too

ramya's dialogues were the highlight

whether mani wanted it, she couldnt deliver or he didnt and she would have is our guess

audience will judge what is shown

as for alia her accent wasn't good enough though she tried, and rajamouli decided not to retain it, but atleast in her case it is her first foray unlike Aish who has been in Tamil films since her debut 20+ yrs ago

but yes for alia too many commented why not take somebody who can dub like nitya menen, sai pallavi or keerthy suresh

and anyway I would hold a jr ntr, ramya, ram charan and dulquer as examples

sai pallavi dubbed in 3 languages for gargi which is a very heavy role

dulquer didnot know a word of telugu and dubbed for heavy duty roles in mahanati and sita ramam

all actors realise this and are putting effort, samantha has dubbed in heavy roles like mahanati, rangasthalam, super deluxe and will do so in hindi too

for flowerpot roles itself its not ok, but when its once in a lifetime role you have to put the effort

if you cant dub then the director should take somebody who can, after all isnt dialogue also major part of acting, it is as much on director as the actor

dubbing was all ok 20 yrs ago, now the stakes are higher

this is not just aish but holds for all actors who cant speak for themselves

Originally posted by: vcs17

if Karthi and jayam ravi, trisha can do it then why not her, they are also speaking the same ancient tamil

They are all native Tamilians. Ash is not.

Originally posted by: Lord_Voldemort

They are all native Tamilians. Ash is not.

so? she is acting in a tamil film that is all matters, not being a native cannot be an excuse forever

karthi, vikram have dubbed in telugu, they are tamil for the same film

is deepika a north indian, sridevi, rekha, hema list goes on, didnt they learn and dub in hindi and urdu and what about all the bengali actresses

deepika has acted in baji rao and padmavat both period films

rekha did umrao jaan which had urdu

hema did razia sultan

none of the actors I mentioned are native to the languages they have dubbed in, they still did in tough roles and languages

kamal hassan did it long ago in multiple languages neither the roles he did or language he spoke was any easier