I understand “half truth is worse than a whole lie” and “innocent until proven guilty”. You don’t have complete information so don’t come to a conclusion. I can even agree to that, that Anupamaa who has lived more than half her life with V does not want to believe he can be a criminal and he can try to deliberately endanger Anuj. Believing in the goodness of humankind is one thing but why the blind trust, when RavanRaj has each and every time broken her trust. She admonished Devika that V won’t have an EMA when she tried to tell Anu, and had to face the worst kind of betrayal a wife can have. Anuj showed his discomfort seeing Malvika getting close to V and expressed his concerns. Anupam again gave a character certificate for V that “woh galat ho sakte hai par ghatiya nahi”. V showed the level of his ghatiyapan by trying to use Malvika against Anuj and almost succeeding. I almost laughed when she said “aurat unki kamzori nahi hai” and we are shown his list of EMA, Kavya wasn’t even the first affair he had. This accident is the third time she has dialogues from the writer that sound like giving a character certificate, the adamant and blind trust that V cannot harm.
If you don’t want to draw a conclusion based on incomplete information, don’t come to a conclusion be it positive or negative. Let the police do their duty and investigate whether it’s a crime or accident, why is it that Anupamaa doesn’t want to even think about a possibility, she doesn’t know what conspired there. I hope she will inform the police whatever Ravanraj says and not listen to Leela Shah.
18