2 Things
1. He is clearly doing this for his movie promotion and not out of actual concern for education system or knowledge
2. Various Mughals rulers ruled for around 300 years. Prithviraj Chauhan ruled for 10 years. It is natural for a history book to offer more coverage to mughal rulers simply going by this
Source of history is manuscripts, writings found on various monuments, biographies, writings by poets of that time. Some of these sources destroyed in wars, earthquakes.
Mughal rulers used to have their autobiography n biographies n had poets in their court who used to write poems in their book from their times, monuments etc. Thats why more is known about them. They were recent that's why less was destroyed.
Like ppl know more details about how Britishers ruled over us
2 Things
1. He is clearly doing this for his movie promotion and not out of actual concern for education system or knowledge
2. Various Mughals rulers ruled for around 300 years. Prithviraj Chauhan ruled for 10 years. It is natural for a history book to offer more coverage to mughal rulers simply going by this
He never denied the mughals impact and rule in India, he was stating that india's own history and historical figures are less talked about and only has few lines for them then outside rulers. Like indian historian wrote much less for them to the point the indian youths don't even know about their own historical rulers. There's nothing wrong in what he said. I live in Britain and even I studied almost everything on british historical figures where only british people know about, it's called british history. In the same way when India talks about history they mostly learn about outside rulers or foreign empires. Its sad that indians only learn about british rule and and mughal rule but don't know much before those rules.
He never denied the mughals impact and rule in India, he was stating that india's own history and historical figures are less talked about and only has few lines for them then outside rulers. Like indian historian wrote much less for them to the point the indian youths don't even know about their own historical rulers. There's nothing wrong in what he said. I live in Britain and even I studied almost everything on british historical figures where only british people know about, it's called british history. In the same way when India talks about history they mostly learn about outside rulers or foreign empires. Its sad that indians only learn about british rule and and mughal rule but don't know much before those rules.
Of course they specifically don't cover Prithviraj in detail. He was a local ruler with a small tenure who is more folk tale than fact.
1. Obviously
2. Various hindu kings ruled for tens of thousands of years in the history of Indian civilization as compared to 300 years of combined mogul rule. However, we have people like you fighting till today for that ugly structure made by babar, an invader who ruled for only 4 years after destroying an ancient temple in one of the holiest city for hindus. How was babar given more importance than lord ram who was born in ayodhya and his father n forefathers and projenies ruled that place for as long as civilization existed. But for those like you Indian history is all about 2 bit uncivilized invaders who had no place of their own to call home,who came to only to loot, rape and plunder an ancient and thriving civilization. Pretty shameful that people in today's and age still defend and go gaga over genocidal invaders while undermining Indians who fought and sacrificed their lives for their future generations. But then what to expect from the product of mugal harem ? They will continue to glorify their rapists and murders due to sick n corrupt ideology they are following.
Your points are valid but all that goes to drain because of the personal attacks. 👎🏼
| Topics | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post Reply |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Upasana’s makeup artist taunts SRK’s racist remarks on Ram Charan
StacyStyle 211 14310 |
StacyStyle | 211 | 14310 | 1 months ago addisonrae |
|
Ameesha Patel accused of homophobic remarks
RaniPreityAish 8 843 |
RaniPreityAish | 8 | 843 | 4 months ago cherry_fan |
|
Snide remarks by Harbhajan on Anushka and Athiya?
Billi_Bangalan 11 1746 |
Billi_Bangalan | 11 | 1746 | 5 months ago DivineAngel |
|
Suhana Khan gets badly trolled her for her performance in Archies
RaniPreityAish 122 15103 |
RaniPreityAish | 122 | 15103 | 1 months ago The_Best |
|
Kiara gets trolled on calling herself an 'Outsider'
cougarTown 38 2063 |
cougarTown | 38 | 2063 | 1 months ago StacyStyle |
