Can't digest Ram's reaction to Vedika not paying NGO money - Page 2

Originally posted by: 9staroneserials

Well, I am not concerned about the gender roles, so won't comment on that. While I accept that Ram might be thinking as you said (not letting your new partner think they are fraud), but after he is ready to pay such a huge amount without even asking them, anyone will think that they are money-sucking leeches all the more. (which they are though 😡)

Which they are 💯

Originally posted by: 9staroneserials

While I do not agree with provider mentality, irrespective of it...it's weird that a person is paying for his ex who has clearly moved on...and the way he was ready to pay immediately seemed like he thinks of it as his responsibility...in reality, paying for her or for that matter, even her husband is not his duty. Well, as for Brinda...she is not his ex-girlfriend for whom he is pinning...but Vedika is.

Exactly! Thats the point - responsibility to provide, which is with the spouse only. It could be with either spouse but this Vedika has no job and is clearly financially dependent on her hubby. As are most homemakers who, unlike her, work hard at home yet have no financial income, so in such cases the hubby is the ‘provider’. Even if both hubby & wife were working, it is would still be indecent for an ex to meet one’s needs without the spouse’s knowledge/consent.

That was the worst scene ever being too much innocent, good hearted and mahaan is not good👎🏼

Agree, too much of goodness can be very annoying to digest..🥱

Originally posted by: 9staroneserials

Agree, too much of goodness can be very annoying to digest..🥱

Originally posted by: Bana

To unilaterally offer to pay a big amount on behalf of another man’s wife - that is exactly what Ram has done is not just weird but indecent.

This is exactly what Priya will be teaching in her next online class 😂😂😂😂😂😂

How if u are in one ‘partnership’ u cannot settle the liabilities of someone in another partnership 🤣

Originally posted by: Bana

How if u are in one ‘partnership’ u cannot settle the liabilities of someone in another partnership 🤣

😂😂😂😂 I like the way you think.

Or as they keep changing her subject this time she could be taking a moral science lecture where the topic of discussion will be paying for an ex -" decent or indecent".