Poll
Should Fateh accept Tejo?
Page
of
1Let's imagine. Instead Lady Jas, Gentleman Jas came back. He was all repentent and tolf Tejo he love her. For her he is ready to redeem his ways. As proof he accepts his crimes and returns the money to his victims. Tejo starts EMA with him because she had developed feelings for him during their engagement period. But Gentleman Jas is back for money because he knows that Virks are filthy rich...
Tejo brings him home - Jas was almost run over by a truck because they have no where to go. He starts living in the guest room and she on the couch outside. Tejo tells Fateh how much she loves Jas. She tried her best but could never accept him as her husband.
Tejo gives Gentleman Jas the responsibilites of the academy because he needs something to do. Tejo kicks Fateh out of the academy. Then more drama and BAM - tejo realizes that Jas is still bad and ask Fateh to accept her back.
Ranveer walks out of Don 3
TUM MERI HOO 24.12
Ranveer Singh Fired From DON 3
Pari : I'm sorry. I miss you mumma.
Hrithik Roshan pictures at Eshaan’s wedding today
Tu Meri Main Tera Main Tera Tu Meri review and box office
Mihir epic one liners
YRKKH 2025 Recap: The Year Logic Died!
Kiara Advani new Vogue interview on motherhood. Whats in my bag
Akshaye Khanna walks out of Drishyam 3
Dhurandhar Part 2 Likely To Move Forward
Tulsi Mihir mulaqat
Yes!! Because FaTejo❤️🤣
I see what you did here👍🏼
Yes, if virks can expect this from Tejo then they should expect this from Fateh too.
But No, if we don’t want Tejo back with Fateh , then same should go in Fateh’s case. EMA is horrible no matter who is the cheater
Ohh now I see. Sorry I was initially confused..yes for the Fatejo shippers, Fateh should definitely accept Tejo
Yes, if virks can expect this from Tejo then they should expect this from Fateh too.
But No, if we don’t want Tejo back with Fateh , then same should go in Fateh’s case. EMA is horrible no matter who is the cheater
i agree with this. but since i no longer want fatejo (and i was a biggg fatejo shipper) the answer would be no.