Raghav and his promises! - Page 2

Originally posted by: farheenbachani

Major therapy in my opinion. His mental health was affected since he thought he was the cause of his father and brother’s death. Lost his mom and sister. Lost his love as well since he apparently was so in love with her. Im sorry but that doesnt gel with me at all.

And then amma brings pallavi and compels him to marry her. Amma should have first tried to talk to him before bringing in pallu as Raghav’s therapist🤣

Originally posted by: farheenbachani

Major therapy in my opinion. His mental health was affected since he thought he was the cause of his father and brother’s death. Lost his mom and sister. Lost his love as well since he apparently was so in love with her. Im sorry but that doesnt gel with me at all.

And then amma brings pallavi and compels him to marry her. Amma should have first tried to talk to him before bringing in pallu as Raghav’s therapist🤣

Pallavi adding to it

ou cn't father a child because you have been drinking like a fish from past 10 years (i can't become a mother)

i won't let you drink

ask hiim why does he drink so much

amma and keerti nahi thay now they are

father and brother ka guilt amma forgave you she knows not your fault

aur

i forced you to marry me

give him a clean chit in a proper manner

now esha wala matter

chhupayakyuun bataya kyun nahi

he ask her to promise she won't leave him

she has told him so why does he need this assurance again? thiink why he needs this have a sensible conversation

he can't give you a child plus his bank balance has gone down

Originally posted by: farheenbachani

Yeah he is still controlling the police. Does that fall under illegal activities? 🤔

You are being facetious, right? Raghav saying to the officer that he'll consider not transferring her but she must leave him alone is a crime in itself. See the Prevention of Corruption Act of 1988, Sections 8, 9, 10 in particular.

In a democracy like India, the police are supposed to work for the justice system that is funded by all taxpayers. The police shouldn't answer to any individual taxpayer for the convenience of his business or himself. An honest business is not legal if it can't be audited to verify its honesty - that is the principle that no one is above the law in a democracy. So, if Raghav can transfer an officer who is investigating his business practices, Raghav's business is illegal simply because it is not answerable to the regulatory authority of the government.

Even if Raghav is a Johnny-come-lately honest taxpayer who pays his customs duties and taxes in full, and even if the police officer's superiors listen to Raghav for free, just because they like him, it's still illegal. Of course, we can presume that Raghav is still bribing the police and probably intimidating other officers as well.

When I decided to write a fan fiction about Pallavi holding Raghav accountable for his illegal business, long before the issue came up on screen, I knew that Pallavi's goal couldn't just be to get Raghav out of future trouble, as if the past is past, and she would take action as herself, not wait for him to act. Pallavi's character is very much "I could not love thee, Dear, so much, lov'd I not Honour more." So, she would want Raghav to believe in honest work because he wants to live as a good person, not to avoid punishment. In my story, Raghav thinks of his predicament as a test of his love for Pallavi and their unborn child (and recalls questioning his own father's view of personal development versus family responsibility), but Pallavi never asks Raghav to choose; she just believes in him and promises to wait.

Desculpa, mais não consegui acompanhar sua linha de raciocínio, você pode ser mais claro? Obrigada

Também espero que seja fechada, de uma maneira clara e objetiva, que alcance seu objetivo, sem trazer danos ao casal, e desgaste emocional ao público, porque o casal merece ter seu momento de paz.

Originally posted by: BrhannadaArmour

You are being facetious, right? Raghav saying to the officer that he'll consider not transferring her but she must leave him alone is a crime in itself. See the Prevention of Corruption Act of 1988, Sections 8, 9, 10 in particular.

In a democracy like India, the police are supposed to work for the justice system that is funded by all taxpayers. The police shouldn't answer to any individual taxpayer for the convenience of his business or himself. An honest business is not legal if it can't be audited to verify its honesty - that is the principle that no one is above the law in a democracy. So, if Raghav can transfer an officer who is investigating his business practices, Raghav's business is illegal simply because it is not answerable to the regulatory authority of the government.

Even if Raghav is a Johnny-come-lately honest taxpayer who pays his customs duties and taxes in full, and even if the police officer's superiors listen to Raghav for free, just because they like him, it's still illegal. Of course, we can presume that Raghav is still bribing the police and probably intimidating other officers as well.

When I decided to write a fan fiction about Pallavi holding Raghav accountable for his illegal business, long before the issue came up on screen, I knew that Pallavi's goal couldn't just be to get Raghav out of future trouble, as if the past is past, and she would take action as herself, not wait for him to act. Pallavi's character is very much "I could not love thee, Dear, so much, lov'd I not Honour more." So, she would want Raghav to believe in honest work because he wants to live as a good person, not to avoid punishment. In my story, Raghav thinks of his predicament as a test of his love for Pallavi and their unborn child (and recalls questioning his own father's view of personal development versus family responsibility), but Pallavi never asks Raghav to choose; she just believes in him and promises to wait.

I’m actually asking the question because where i live that would be considered illegal so was wondering if that is the same in India. To me yes but i dont know the law there.

farheenbachani, I live in Canada, and you have shared that you do too, right? Whatever legal information I'm sharing is right off the internet, and I do not claim to be an expert at all.

If anyone who is familiar with the law in India wants to argue that Raghav interfering in a police investigation could possibly be legal, or that Jayati Jewels wouldn't be criminally responsible for his actions, go ahead and cite statutes, the way I cited the Prevention of Corruption Act of 1988, Sections 8, 9, 10 in particular.

Originally posted by: BrhannadaArmour

farheenbachani, I live in Canada, and you have shared that you do too, right? Whatever legal information I'm sharing is right off the internet, and I do not claim to be an expert at all.

If anyone who is familiar with the law in India wants to argue that Raghav interfering in a police investigation could possibly be legal, or that Jayati Jewels wouldn't be criminally responsible for his actions, go ahead and cite statutes, the way I cited the Prevention of Corruption Act of 1988, Sections 8, 9, 10 in particular.

Right! So that means he hasnt stopped all his illegal activities

I don't think it's simply about transfering her so that she doesn't investigate his business. It's also because she recklessly killed Abhishek and shot Pallavi (she could have died).

Fair enough, Raghav has more than just one corrupt motive here. While it's not at all Raghav's right to determine her punishment, transferring a murderer to new hunting grounds is no solution to the problem.

The dialogue writers have always created ironic situations to present Raghav as a hypocrite: for example, telling Pallavi that girls are too emotional, just before he grabbed Manasi's camera and broke it in a rage; or telling Vijay to save his lecture and stop being egoistic, right after lecturing Vijay about how to succeed in business and bragging about how many awards he has lined up at home. Now, Raghav calling anyone else trigger-happy - well, yes, she is, and Raghav has a right to say so, but he should hold himself accountable as well, having shot near the ear of Jagadish Aṇṇā's son and gone after Mandar with a gun on five occasions (and ambiguously discharging a bullet in a room full of dancers), when calling the police would have been more sensible each time.