Originally posted by: BrhannadaArmour
Sorry, I can't relate to this one at all. The juxtaposition of a murder and a domestic quarrel was just too jarring.
Raghav beats up men who molest women, or even Akash for being nice to Kirti and Jaya, and Raghav probably knew that shooting a bullet next to the ear of Jagadish Aṇṇā's son (who delivered the indecent photos of Kirti) could have handicapped him for life, but ... I hope Raghav would stop short of premeditated killing. Even when he was driving Dr. Kanika (and Farhad) over a cliff, Raghav must have planned to stop in time. Raghav once told Pallavi that he doesn't want another death on his conscience. That allusion to the deaths of his father and brother has to mean more to him than his rage that makes him pull his gun to use on Mandar. I know, four occasions is a lot: first after chasing the ambulance, then in the toilet (which Sai Ketan Rao says he improvised), then when Jaya stopped him, and now with the divorce papers ... but even if Raghav could kill someone when he's excited, premeditated is different.
Pallavi is not someone whose reaction to witnessing a murder would be to stop talking to the murderer and soon forgive him. She would absolutely report Raghav to the police. I know, she's taking her sweet time to report Mandar, but she's supposed to be law-abiding, right? Jaya used to be like that too.
On a lighter note, how can a waiter in a restaurant be someone whose rich father would get him out of jail?