How does Trust work??? - Page 2

Originally posted by: Shakti1604

Thanks for tagging me. As an audience I have been disconnected with Pallavi for a while now, it's mainly because how her dialogues are. Despite knowing Keerthi's actions of the recent past she managed to use trust & Keerthi in the same sentence, although she was trying to explain her position to Raghav. Her trusting her husband is not equal to trusting her SIL because she has seen the actions of both parties up close & personal. Raghav is no saint, agreed, and his business issues were not in focus in that particular situation, it was only about Keerthi's elopement. Raghav & Amma were no doubt unreasonable & never reflected on their own actions & attitude towards Keerthi, but I too felt that dialogue was not needed.

If I may take the liberty to state neither is the story being scripted well nor are the dialogues being written aptly. Lot of disconnect in the flow & many aspects are left open for interpretation. Most ironic one, Pallavi asking Aayi's opinion !!

It looks like Pallavi and Aai’s equation has not changed and Pallavi’s moral compass doesn’t seem to mind Aai’s actions in the Mandhar track. As you said , I have also not been able to relate to Pallavi’s character and I am still finding it hard to connect to the drama flow in this track as well..

Writers dont want to accomplish anything. I hv lost whatever trust I had on them since the whole " Farz and kartavya" monologue .

Basically they just try to incorporate big big words to make it sound like something really poignant or significant is being said but when you actually hear them you will keep scratching your brains out trying to figure out what the hell was just said .

Originally posted by: Priya516

I have been thinking about a dialogue that Pallavi spoke while trying to reason out when Raghav blamed her for letting Keerthi go?

She reasoned with Raghav saying “I trusted her the same way I trusted you on the commissioner matter” .. How are they the same ? Trust is subjective and for a wife trust on her husband is manifold and you cannot have that same trust for a SIL who you know has worked against you. So to me Pallavi is either not understanding what a marriage is or how a dynamics of a family work .
I think the writers have to tighten up on dialogues as these make us wonder what are they trying to accomplish here ..

I guess its in Pallavi's nature to trust others easily. But once she gets the clue that she is trusting wrong person ,she gives it back.

And here when Raghav and Amma tried to lock up Kirti in a room , she was against it. And somewhere kirti is also the victim because whatever the problem is - locking a person is not acceptable even it is done by family members.

So yes she trusted kirti naively .

Her only mistake was that she trusted Kirti.

Originally posted by: Priya516

I have been thinking about a dialogue that Pallavi spoke while trying to reason out when Raghav blamed her for letting Keerthi go?

She reasoned with Raghav saying “I trusted her the same way I trusted you on the commissioner matter” .. How are they the same ? Trust is subjective and for a wife trust on her husband is manifold and you cannot have that same trust for a SIL who you know has worked against you. So to me Pallavi is either not understanding what a marriage is or how a dynamics of a family work .
I think the writers have to tighten up on dialogues as these make us wonder what are they trying to accomplish here ..

I hope writers put some extra efforts in writing Pals dialogues henceforth .

I dont know why they are hell bent on making Pals character not relatable.

If we obliterate M track , I feel she is being her original self nowadays.

Originally posted by: Owia

I hope writers put some extra efforts in writing Pals dialogues henceforth .

I dont know why they are hell bent on making Pals character not relatable.

If we obliterate M track , I feel she is being her original self nowadays.

I know .. It’s so unrelatable now..

Sorry dear I don't watch her scenes even with Raghav. So can't answer your question. 😆

Even if I had watched I don't think I will have an answer. I am mere human being with lots of flaws, can't really understand what Devi Pallavi with such a moral high hand means most of the time. 😆

Thanks for tagging me. Actually pallavi ke dialogues kisi ki bhi samjh me nahi a rahe aur isi liye sab ko pallavi ke character se relate hona difficult lag raha hai. Is dialogue ke bare me main kehna chahti hoon ke may be ye hi dikhaya gaya hai ke pallavi har kisi par trust kar leti hai aur usne jo raghav or keerti ka comparison kiya hai wo is liye kiya hai bcs necklace wali baat ko lekar raghav ne usse jo kuch bhi kaha usse pallavi convince nahi thi but usne raghav par trust kiya so wo ye kehne ki koshish kar rahi thi ke in same way usne keerti par trust kiya but you are right pallavi ka raghav aur keerti par same way se trust karna absolutely wrong hai keerti ne ab tak jo kuch bhi kiya hai or kis limit tak keerti ja sakti hai I mean jo keerti ne mandar ke case me kiya uska sath dekar,pallavi wo sab janti hai but phir bhi usne keerti par trust kiya or uske jane ke bare me batane ke liye kuch khas effort nahi kiya jab ke keerti use dhoke se room me lock karke gayi thi. So in my opinion pallavi ki bhi galati thi.

Mujhe to pallavi ne jo raghav ko explanation di wo bhi samjh nahi aayi ek taraf wo kehti hai keerti use dhoke se room me lock karke chali gayi or dusri taraf kehti hai usne keerti par trust kiya to raghav aur jaya ko ye hi lagega na ke pallavi ne khud keerti ko bejha hai us par trust karke bcs agar keerti use dhoka dekar gayi thi to use raghav aur jaya ko batana chahiye tha

So writers ko sach me pallavi ke dialogues par dhyan dena chahiye aise track change karne se kuch nahi hoga.

I hope i answer your question