How does Trust work???

I have been thinking about a dialogue that Pallavi spoke while trying to reason out when Raghav blamed her for letting Keerthi go?

She reasoned with Raghav saying “I trusted her the same way I trusted you on the commissioner matter” .. How are they the same ? Trust is subjective and for a wife trust on her husband is manifold and you cannot have that same trust for a SIL who you know has worked against you. So to me Pallavi is either not understanding what a marriage is or how a dynamics of a family work .
I think the writers have to tighten up on dialogues as these make us wonder what are they trying to accomplish here ..

It was very naive thing for her to do, knowing she was only responsible for the whole divorce situation & also, sunny brain washing her, she should have been more careful. It was all Kirtis fault that everyone is angry at Pallu but she is at fault too by trusting Kirti. In this show Anna is the only one suffering the most.

For me the biggest comedy is Pallavi who preaches Raghav 24/7 about morals ethics values etc supports and calls Aai to ask for advice who hid a murder 🤣.

Originally posted by: Priya516

I have been thinking about a dialogue that Pallavi spoke while trying to reason out when Raghav blamed her for letting Keerthi go?

She reasoned with Raghav saying “I trusted her the same way I trusted you on the commissioner matter” .. How are they the same ? Trust is subjective and for a wife trust on her husband is manifold and you cannot have that same trust for a SIL who you know has worked against you. So to me Pallavi is either not understanding what a marriage is or how a dynamics of a family work .
I think the writers have to tighten up on dialogues as these make us wonder what are they trying to accomplish here ..

There is no comparison at all. Keerti cannot be compared to Raghav and trusting Raghav is not the same as trusting Keerti. Keerti has let her down a few times and Pallavi knows what she has done. She is the one who told Raghav that Keerti got the divorce papers signed. One thing that they havent brought out is the drugged kheer. No one knows about that yet. I guess that has become bhool bhool...as usual

That dialogue made no sense and if you look at the way it was even said, it seemed like it was just thrown in. These days the dialogues are all over the place. There is no continuity at all.

Originally posted by: chokri

For me the biggest comedy is Pallavi who preaches Raghav 24/7 about morals ethics values etc supports and calls Aai to ask for advice who hid a murder 🤣.

Yes so true.. I am not sure why they have to include the deshmukh’s in all the tracks ..

Originally posted by: farheenbachani

There is no comparison at all. Keerti cannot be compared to Raghav and trusting Raghav is not the same as trusting Keerti. Keerti has let her down a few times and Pallavi knows what she has done. She is the one who told Raghav that Keerti got the divorce papers signed. One thing that they havent brought out is the drugged kheer. No one knows about that yet. I guess that has become bhool bhool...as usual

That dialogue made no sense and if you look at the way it was even said, it seemed like it was just thrown in. These days the dialogues are all over the place. There is no continuity at all.

yes absolutely.. There is no continuity nowadays and the dialogues need to tightened up and should make sense to the viewers..

Originally posted by: jolly_fl

It was very naive thing for her to do, knowing she was only responsible for the whole divorce situation & also, sunny brain washing her, she should have been more careful. It was all Kirtis fault that everyone is angry at Pallu but she is at fault too by trusting Kirti. In this show Anna is the only one suffering the most.

It’s like we have to forget what happened in the previous track and watch the new track with no continuity..

I found that dialogue very very odd too. How do you put your husband and SIL ( whom you know bores ill will for you) in the same balance in the issue of trust? At the outset I’d want to say, that Pallavi is a mere victim of circumstances in this issue ( of keerthi bolting and getting married) and her biggest flaw in trusting everyone blindly is the only crime she committed.

Regarding your question - I felt that that dialogue by Pallavi was to justify herself and there was a backhanded slap to Raghav too(my opinion) in that she meant I’m trusting you blindly in the commissioner thing and didn’t question it despite some niggling doubt (cause after that scene when Raghav gave back the necklace and said sorry etc she didn’t look convinced) that you are low key straddling the tight rope of truth and lie and I’m choosing to let it go for now. Of course it goes with her character of being high on morals(selectively) . That’s what I deduced. And this was my interpretation of that weird dialogue. So effectively Pallavi was saying I trust everyone the same.
Amma and Raghav I know are in pain and helplessness over the keerthi matter but they need to get a grip on themselves and stop playing victim. They are in part to blame for what keerthi did if not more. I’m not sure how this is gonna play out but ignoring Pallavi is not the way to approach this. She doesn’t deserve it.
I guess I rambled offf topic too. 😆Pardon..

Originally posted by: Looneygirl

I found that dialogue very very odd too. How do you put your husband and SIL ( whom you know bores ill will for you) in the same balance in the issue of trust? At the outset I’d want to say, that Pallavi is a mere victim of circumstances in this issue ( of keerthi bolting and getting married) and her biggest flaw in trusting everyone blindly is the only crime she committed.

Regarding your question - I felt that that dialogue by Pallavi was to justify herself and there was a backhanded slap to Raghav too(my opinion) in that she meant I’m trusting you blindly in the commissioner thing and didn’t question it despite some niggling doubt (cause after that scene when Raghav gave back the necklace and said sorry etc she didn’t look convinced) that you are low key straddling the tight rope of truth and lie and I’m choosing to let it go for now. Of course it goes with her character of being high on morals(selectively) . That’s what I deduced. And this was my interpretation of that weird dialogue. So effectively Pallavi was saying I trust everyone the same.
Amma and Raghav I know are in pain and helplessness over the keerthi matter but they need to get a grip on themselves and stop playing victim. They are in part to blame for what keerthi did if not more. I’m not sure how this is gonna play out but ignoring Pallavi is not the way to approach this. She doesn’t deserve it.
I guess I rambled offf topic too. 😆Pardon..

You can ramble off to your hearts content here 😊

Her morals are very selective and it’s always only for Raghav and doesn’t apply to deshmukh’s.. She calls Aai to discuss Keerthi issue..

Thanks for tagging me. As an audience I have been disconnected with Pallavi for a while now, it's mainly because how her dialogues are. Despite knowing Keerthi's actions of the recent past she managed to use trust & Keerthi in the same sentence, although she was trying to explain her position to Raghav. Her trusting her husband is not equal to trusting her SIL because she has seen the actions of both parties up close & personal. Raghav is no saint, agreed, and his business issues were not in focus in that particular situation, it was only about Keerthi's elopement. Raghav & Amma were no doubt unreasonable & never reflected on their own actions & attitude towards Keerthi, but I too felt that dialogue was not needed.

If I may take the liberty to state neither is the story being scripted well nor are the dialogues being written aptly. Lot of disconnect in the flow & many aspects are left open for interpretation. Most ironic one, Pallavi asking Aayi's opinion !!