Request to stop the beating parade - Page 9

Originally posted by: Raghav_Rao

You know aaj kal mujhe itna disappointed feel hota h, ke sometimes rona aa jaata hai mujhe, jaise ke abhi bhi aankho mein aansoo h

Mujhe bas yeh hota h ke Har taraf Anna Anna, Raghav Sai hota hai toh log kyu nahi aate!

Naise aaj tumhara post hi dekh lo, koi aya ? Nahi na? Bahut hi kam response!

It's just ke Raghav ke liye kyu nahi?

Aaj i wasn't free, but now sham se free hoon but AT jane ka man nahi, the place, o consider my second home ..dil nahi jane ko.... really disappointed i'm!

Alas!

No one can understand the emotions!

I want you to know that I really appreciate what you people are doing for Sai/ Raghav.

I visit the AT sometimes and post some of his photos too but I fail to spend more time there. I promise you I will make an effort to be regular on the thread.

Thank you for explaining as a doctor how the choking scene failed. I'll admit that comedy is not worth giving up an opportunity to show the proper way to help a choking person. However, Pallavi may not know the Heimlich manoeuver, and so this fictional character did whatever she could, just as an ignorant person might in real life. Isn't it possible that hitting Raghav between the shoulder blades could also dislodge the piece of chicken from his throat?

I count it as the second time she saved his life intentionally, but the third time overall; the first time was when she thought Raghav had registered the explosive car in her name, so she accidentally short-circuited the electric chair by shoving Raghav into a waiter carrying drinks - more violence against the innocent man!

Originally posted by: Jiarao

I am really sorry for the disappointment you are feeling.

I want you to know that I really appreciate what you people are doing for Sai/ Raghav.

I visit the AT sometimes and post some of his photos too but I fail to spend more time there. I promise you I will make an effort to be regular on the thread.

Thank you for your words dear!

It's ok... atleast you chose to express yourself! This is enough!

Thank you so much for your concern🤗

Originally posted by: BrhannadaArmour

Thank you for explaining as a doctor how the choking scene failed. I'll admit that comedy is not worth giving up an opportunity to show the proper way to help a choking person. However, Pallavi may not know the Heimlich manoeuver, and so this fictional character did whatever she could, just as an ignorant person might in real life. Isn't it possible that hitting Raghav between the shoulder blades could also dislodge the piece of chicken from his throat?

I count it as the second time she saved his life intentionally, but the third time overall; the first time was when she thought Raghav had registered the explosive car in her name, so she accidentally short-circuited the electric chair by shoving Raghav into a waiter carrying drinks - more violence against the innocent man!

Yes I agree she might not be familiar with the heimlich. So she did the best she could.

Even then, the pause in between to make comments like “khana toh theek se aata nhi hai, challenge jeetna hai inhe…..” (sorry don’t remember what she exactly said) and then Raghav, as he recovers, is not even slightly thankful but taunts her. That is not how a person who just returns from a near death experience, behaves.

It’s not about what Raghav or Pallavi did you see, I am fine with both of them there. I can revisit the scene and even let out a small chuckle now. It’s about what makers did. They tried to make it into a comic scene, though it wasn’t really the place to do that. It called for an intense scene you know. At least I was expecting one. And hence I was vey disappointed- it continued for days before I could let it go.

oh yes, thanks for the reminder. It was indeed the third time Pallavi had saved Raghav’s life. I see the jibe you made there and I agree, Raghav was anything but innocent. But it’s just how the story is I guess. He was never perfect and never claimed to be. And Pallavi was the one who could still see the good in him while everyone else even refused to try. All this when she was his prime target. Pallavi should get a lot of credit here and rightfully so.

Originally posted by: inlieu

This is the first show for which I've even visited an AT, just because of Sai but I'm not a regular.

Is the AT only to discuss him or he character Raghav too?

I'm sorry you feel alone there. I will try to make an effort.

Thank you for consideration..

I think we can speak about SKR and RR both..

Originally posted by: BrhannadaArmour

I agree that there's too much violence on this show, but honestly, there are some scenes in which violence is dramatically effective.

Sulochana hitting Amruta was supposed to make us feel sorry for Amruta and disgusted by Sulochana. It worked for me; simply shouting wouldn't have conveyed how depraved Sulochana is. I saw a frightened child who had trusted her mother to help with an unplanned pregnancy, and an unfit mother who took out her frustration on her child. So, when Pallavi shielded Amruta and was kind to her, it wasn't unbelievably magnanimous; I understood Pallavi's sympathy.

Likewise, when Jaya slapped Raghav after he brought Pallavi back to the saṃgīta, it was meant to jolt us viewers to feel sympathy for Raghav because his mother saw him as a sexual predator. It worked for me. After Jaya told Raghav what she thought he had done, and Raghav explained that he had rescued Pallavi and said Kṣamiñcu anyway, the scene of Raghav crying while hugging Jaya's ghuṅgarū and Ajit's nādasvaram might have seemed like an overreaction. With the physical sting of Jaya's slap, it made more sense for Raghav to cry like that.

When Raghav was choking, yes, it would have been serious in real life, but we all knew that Raghav wouldn't die this way. So, I wasn't offended. I enjoyed the irony that Pallavi, who had just muttered that a few slaps could have fixed Raghav before too late, immediately got a chance to pound on him, and had to hit harder than she wanted to.

I wasn't offended that Pallavi hit Raghav with the soft broom, but the stick was unacceptable. If the genders were reversed, a husband could playfully hit his wife with a soft broom if they both understood that it's not intimidation. However, Raghav and Pallavi were just starting to trust each other at that time, and this playful hitting didn't seem believable.

Some posts in this thread have asked, what if it was Raghav being violent to Pallavi? The show wouldn't survive, right? Well, he has behaved threateningly or overpowered her many times. I'll just mention two occasions.

First, when he was at the courthouse to bail out Jaya and Kirti, and she thought he was there to interfere in her stay-of-eviction order, he raised his hand to hit her and she cringed, and then he shoved her onto her lawyer (Jaydip). I suppose that was meant to show that Raghav has a temper and hates Pallavi, and still managed to limit his violent reaction, but it just seemed gratuitous to me.

Second, when Vijay was in jail and Pallavi was scolding Raghav, he gagged her, held her wrists, and slung her over his shoulder. I thought that the person who was watching them would record it and publish photos to embarrass Raghav, but no, the scene was comedy to show how unconventional this loving couple is. It was just demeaning and male chauvinistic.

I have read the whole thread so far, so please don't feel the need to repeat what you've already written - but it's up to you, of course. Please don't hesitate to tell me if I've offended you.

Iam sorry but I think you are stuck at villan raghav who maligned pallu character you dont want to move on from that chahe pallu ne usse maaf kaar diya ho aur ussiko apna husband aur pyaar manti ho you dont want to accept that thats why always searches mistakes in raghav Iam not saying he is saint he is grey I accept it but pallu wants him only

We cant deny it.

Evdn though Iam quoting this post this explanation is not for above post

I didn't comment on this post yesterday because I didn't see the episode till much later.I didn't know she beat him with a stick! I thought she hit him slightly or pushed him for annoying her.

Raghav was wrong, but physical violence shouldn't be so normalised . The only time Raghav deserved beating from Pallavi was when he defamed pallavi , that's understandable , no one would sit quietly when you're being defamed unnecessarily .

The broom scene was the worst, that was so unnecessary. I cringed when they passed it off as comedy 😫

Originally posted by: BrhannadaArmour

Thank you for explaining as a doctor how the choking scene failed. I'll admit that comedy is not worth giving up an opportunity to show the proper way to help a choking person. However, Pallavi may not know the Heimlich manoeuver, and so this fictional character did whatever she could, just as an ignorant person might in real life. Isn't it possible that hitting Raghav between the shoulder blades could also dislodge the piece of chicken from his throat?

I count it as the second time she saved his life intentionally, but the third time overall; the first time was when she thought Raghav had registered the explosive car in her name, so she accidentally short-circuited the electric chair by shoving Raghav into a waiter carrying drinks - more violence against the innocent man!

Hey

I can argue with sensible and understanding POVs..

Ignoring my post and taking an indirect jab here is not necessary..

I never claimed him to be innocent and pall to be wrong by any means ..

I am not a blind supporter, I have raised my voice equally for issues related to Pallavi...

If you feel disagree, you can move on from this post..

Thank you

I read your reply to me, and I don't wish to respond, so I won't. I wasn't taking a jab at you or anybody else, so please don't feel bad.

It's a fact that Raghav was innocent of registering the explosive car in Pallavi's name, although he confessed. And Pallavi shoved him without any physical provocation by him. So, not speaking for you, I sincerely wrote that Pallavi shoving Raghav was violence and the man was innocent.