I have recently realized that this forum has a special "love" for Devdas. Not just SRK's Devdas. Even Dilip Kumar's Devdas. Since it's not just blind SRK fan girling, I thought of making a topic on it.
I've often seen the character of Devdas get alot of shit. People call him a pathetic loser (which tbh he is) who didn't deserve either Paro or Chandramukhi.
Whether it's the novel or the movie adaptations (except Dev.D which has a bit different story and ending), Devdas is a really tragic character. I don't think we're supposed to judge this guy considering the fate he meets in the end.
So this is a guy who loves Paro but blows it up by arriving too late to pick her up. He shows up at her wedding and asks her to runaway with him. I understand why Paro can't do that because of the time this movie is set in.
Running away would've made her family suffer shame and humiliation in front of the society for the rest of their lives. Heck it's still a big deal today so what can we expect from 1900s.
But why isn't Devdas given the same excuse? How people expect Devdas to settle with Chandramukhi who is a courtesan...who runs her own brothel? Do people actually realize what her profession was in the movie and when it was set in?
And why do people think it's easy to move on? Nobody wants to be in depression. Devdas turned to alcohol and got addicted to it. It was a way for him to move on from Paro. Again its common for people to turn to alcohol and drugs to deal with sadness.
He knew he was addicted but again this movie was set in a time when rehabilitation centers didn't exist and mental illness wasn't a concept. His family also gave him a cold shoulder and didn't support when he needed them. Devdas, Paro and Chandramukhi were victims of the age they were born in. Their fates were always doomed.
So don't see them through the lenses of today's time and say why he/she couldn't do this or that.
32