Pakhi Character Analysis 🧐 - Page 6

Originally posted by: Fruitcustard_9

Nice post laksh

Bold : pakhi really cares for virat ? Sai was no where in d picture when vaada thing happened b/w virakhi , where was d so called concern or care for virat ? Shailesh pakhi's father asked why she wanted to see virat without any support whole life( any sane person would ask this only ) , pakhi's answer pyar paagalpan hota hain. Can u explain this laksh ?

I agree with u samrat should have think about his mother & family but why should samrat work for a relationship jisko neev jhoot or dhoke pe rakhi gayi hai. Samrat ne shaadi ki hain adopt nhi kiya tha pakhi ki usse jhoot or dhoke ko bhi tolerate karega

Regarding sairat unka rishta ke neev sach pe rakhi gayi hai both were aware what is other person feeling regarding marriage . Virat to tell truth to sai before marriage coz he dint wanted to cheat her , he dint wanted that she keep expectations with him which he can't fulfill coz that time he was not in love with her thou sairat feeling changed after marriage.

Samrat ko ye mauka diya gaya tha ? He kept on asking & kept on listening lies , he may have thought d gloominess of pakhi can be coz of marriage. How rudely pakhi behaved on d mentioned of honeymoon samrat might had not left but after seeing pakhi's reaction he made up his mind . Samrat virat ko mauka dena chahiye tha pakhi ko nhi jisse already itne mauke mil chuke the. 4 virat samrat may think what made him do so even samrat had guilt to snatch virat's happiness but what excuse pakhi has for d lies .

Hi Deepika,

Will get back to your questions a little later, have something to do now. All your questions are valid and I understand where they are coming from.

Originally posted by: Fruitcustard_9

Nice post laksh

Bold : pakhi really cares for virat ? Sai was no where in d picture when vaada thing happened b/w virakhi , where was d so called concern or care for virat ? Shailesh pakhi's father asked why she wanted to see virat without any support whole life( any sane person would ask this only ) , pakhi's answer pyar paagalpan hota hain. Can u explain this laksh ?

I agree with u samrat should have think about his mother & family but why should samrat work for a relationship jisko neev jhoot or dhoke pe rakhi gayi hai. Samrat ne shaadi ki hain adopt nhi kiya tha pakhi ki usse jhoot or dhoke ko bhi tolerate karega

Regarding sairat unka rishta ke neev sach pe rakhi gayi hai both were aware what is other person feeling regarding marriage . Virat to tell truth to sai before marriage coz he dint wanted to cheat her , he dint wanted that she keep expectations with him which he can't fulfill coz that time he was not in love with her thou sairat feeling changed after marriage.

Samrat ko ye mauka diya gaya tha ? He kept on asking & kept on listening lies , he may have thought d gloominess of pakhi can be coz of marriage. How rudely pakhi behaved on d mentioned of honeymoon samrat might had not left but after seeing pakhi's reaction he made up his mind . Samrat virat ko mauka dena chahiye tha pakhi ko nhi jisse already itne mauke mil chuke the. 4 virat samrat may think what made him do so even samrat had guilt to snatch virat's happiness but what excuse pakhi has for d lies .

Whatever happen with samrat,more than Pakhi it was virat fault.it was his god complex which is responsible for samrat suffering.samrat was an almost stranger to Pakhi.But he was virat brother whom he love so much.No sane person will ever let his brother get into a loveless relationship.he let samrat wedding to Pakhi that too when she was begging him to stop this wedding and not only this he emotionally manipulated her by giving virat chavan pakki jaban.

Lastly it is perfectly fine and sensible if samrat decide to end this relationship with Pakhi after whatever happen.this is the best for them.But him leaving everything due to Pakhi is equally selfish as Pakhi left everything for virat.

Originally posted by: sadiltl

@Laksh,

Very beautiful analysis. I wish CVs shows this complexity well and Aish potrays it well.

Thanks dear. I wanted to create this post a few days back but got into some other discussion. Also, I just tried to explain, it is a complex character and hard to explain. Since this topic was raised, I thought that I will reply to this than creating a new post.

Sach kahoon toh, I am able to understand why it looks as if Aish isn't portraying it well. I am also able to understand why Aish is failing many a times. I have been able to understand her or her emotions many a times.

Originally posted by: Jrf2021

Whatever happen with samrat,more than Pakhi it was virat fault.it was his god complex which is responsible for samrat suffering.samrat was an almost stranger to Pakhi.But he was virat brother whom he love so much.No sane person will ever let his brother get into a loveless relationship.he let samrat wedding to Pakhi that too when she was begging him to stop this wedding and not only this he emotionally manipulated her by giving virat chavan pakki jaban.

Lastly it is perfectly fine and sensible if samrat decide to end this relationship with Pakhi after whatever happen.this is the best for them.But him leaving everything due to Pakhi is equally selfish as Pakhi left everything for virat.

Why should virat say anything b/w d two people who decided to get married by their own consent , if virat dint turned up on haldi shaadi ho jaati , virat only requested pakhi to continue with her decision as he decided not to marry her & he was right , it was pakhi's decision to get married to samrat & she was not pressurized into this by her parents .

Virat kya batata Samrat ko jisse tum shaadi karne ja rahe vo mujhe pe fida hain vo tumko last moment pe pata chal raha hain wow👏

Samrat & family - tumpe Fida hain samrat se shaadi ke liye kyu ha kardi .tumpe fida hain to sangeet pe fully dress hoke kyu aayi , why she is still continuing with d marriage function

Virat - kya answer dena chahiye tha virat ko .

Samrat pakhi se shaadi kar raha tha na ki virat se . It was pakhi who should tell samrat not virat .

Virat ko nhi pata pakhi ditched samrat from first meeting only .

Coming to vaada thing virat ne option diya tha , usse accept karna hain ki nhi pakhi ka decision tha & she had chance to move out still she choose her own benefit.

Virat nhi to samrat ye rule pakhi follow kar rahi hain.

Samrat fell in love with pakhi's outer beauty , he was all gaga over her , see d phone call of samrat virat during samrakhi first meeting it was virat who asked samrat to take time before saying yes thou he dint know it was pakhi.

Everything was finalized before virat came in .

If virat dint gave vaada still she would had married samrat just to be near virat.

Vaishali pakhi's mother asked if she was in love with virat why she agreed to marry samrat we dint pressurized u , pakhi replied kyunki main gusse thi I dint know virat was searching me .

Itna gussa ki kissi dusre ki zindagi barbaad kardo .

Originally posted by: Fruitcustard_9

If virat dint gave vaada still she would had married samrat just to be near virat.

She would have married Samrat no matter what.

Vaada toh uske liye bonus tha.

Nice! This thread has very nice analysis of characters. They are definitely complex and situations are also complex to analyze them correctly. Thats why this show has lot of potential.

As far as my thoughts go, not being pedagogic here but .. bear with me.

In any given life situation, if a person thinks beyond himself and tries to take an action (within his/her limitations) with good intentions that might benefit larger group of people then it is the 'right' action. The outcome could go wrong, but the intention was never wrong. That action is deemed selfless. In India, we call it 'dharma'. It is not the right thing per say but the action done with right intentions. I judge people/characters with that understanding.

So, whatever Virat has done comes from that right intention. He is selfless and so were his actions. They might have gone wrong. that is what the story is about. Sai's character also, comes from right intentions. So they are positive in the sense their intentions were right.

Samrat, for me is 'grey'. He does not have the courage to face a situation and take an action. Virat is brave. He handled Pakhi-Samrat situation in the best possible way and his marriage with Sai also in the best possible way 'accoriding' to him. That shows his character. Samrat flew from the situation instead of facing it.

Pakhi, from what I established from above and my previous post thinks only about herself. She at this point can take only those actions that will hurt not only others but herself too. The character is negative from this point of view.

This is only my way of seeing things.

Originally posted by: Jrf2021

Whatever happen with samrat,more than Pakhi it was virat fault.it was his god complex which is responsible for samrat suffering.samrat was an almost stranger to Pakhi.But he was virat brother whom he love so much.No sane person will ever let his brother get into a loveless relationship.he let samrat wedding to Pakhi that too when she was begging him to stop this wedding and not only this he emotionally manipulated her by giving virat chavan pakki jaban.

Lastly it is perfectly fine and sensible if samrat decide to end this relationship with Pakhi after whatever happen.this is the best for them.But him leaving everything due to Pakhi is equally selfish as Pakhi left everything for virat.

I would never absolve Pakhi of her faults in this situation. What stopped her from stopping the marriage?let’s assume I agree , Virat was emotionally blackmailing her. Should she have fallen for it? If she can be emotionally manipulated for Virat because she loves him. Virat is emotionally much more attached to his brother who he has known all his life.

The choice was left to her. Even when her parents stopped her she was like I want to be close to Virat so I am marrying his brother .It’s insane.

Pakhi is more at fault for not being honest with samrat. Both Virat and Pakhi are responsible. But I would be more 40 /60. Just because she doesn’t know samrat doesn’t mean she can just do what she wants. If she loved Virat; she wouldn’t have married samrat. That would have atleast given her a chance ( a long shot /atleast)

I try but I can never understand her character in any version of this story. I do try my best to be unbiased but I just don’t see her or even emotionally connect with her pain. Sometimes it’s sad but when I see that she had a choice, it just goes off.

Just my opinion

Originally posted by: Fruitcustard_9

Why should virat say anything b/w d two people who decided to get married by their own consent , if virat dint turned up on haldi shaadi ho jaati , virat only requested pakhi to continue with her decision as he decided not to marry her & he was right , it was pakhi's decision to get married to samrat & she was not pressurized into this by her parents .

Virat kya batata Samrat ko jisse tum shaadi karne ja rahe vo mujhe pe fida hain vo tumko last moment pe pata chal raha hain wow👏

Samrat & family - tumpe Fida hain samrat se shaadi ke liye kyu ha kardi .tumpe fida hain to sangeet pe fully dress hoke kyu aayi , why she is still continuing with d marriage function

Virat - kya answer dena chahiye tha virat ko .

Samrat pakhi se shaadi kar raha tha na ki virat se . It was pakhi who should tell samrat not virat .

Virat ko nhi pata pakhi ditched samrat from first meeting only .

Coming to vaada thing virat ne option diya tha , usse accept karna hain ki nhi pakhi ka decision tha & she had chance to move out still she choose her own benefit.

Virat nhi to samrat ye rule pakhi follow kar rahi hain.

Samrat fell in love with pakhi's outer beauty , he was all gaga over her , see d phone call of samrat virat during samrakhi first meeting it was virat who asked samrat to take time before saying yes thou he dint know it was pakhi.

Everything was finalized before virat came in .

If virat dint gave vaada still she would had married samrat just to be near virat.

If and buts are always ohr imagination in the fiction.

Just keep them aside whatever they showed that Pakhi was begging virat to stop this marriage.she does not want to marry samrat.He said"agar tumhare liye m kuch bhi hoon,hmare bitaye huye pal kuch bhi maybe rakhte hai to tum yeh shaadi kar lo Pakhi". something like that on these lines.its called emotional manipulation.obviously Pakhi us also at biggest fault.but she is paying price every second right now kind of life is living.

Secondly if virat actually thought about samrat happiness for life ,then he would have never let his brother to get married with a girl who does not love him.he wanted to pay back the favour of samrat at that time by giving away his previous thing.

U r right if he would have told truth,samrat may be heartbroken,sad.but it would have less than 1% compared to the pain samrat is in right now.

Though I understood virat at that by looking at his family,his emotions but the fact is he made a very wrong choice for pakhi,samrat and himself.

Similarly samrat made a wrong choice by just leaving everything without even thinking abkut his mom and family.

Pakhi has also made so many wrong choices as we discussed on length already.

Sai has made so many wrong choice to agree to marry a guy who told her someone is in my life,now by eloping devi tai with pulkit.

So right now these 4 are in present situation due to the wrong choices made by 4 of them.

More or less , everyone is responsible for present situation.

Originally posted by: Fruitcustard_9

Why should virat say anything b/w d two people who decided to get married by their own consent , if virat dint turned up on haldi shaadi ho jaati , virat only requested pakhi to continue with her decision as he decided not to marry her & he was right , it was pakhi's decision to get married to samrat & she was not pressurized into this by her parents .

Virat kya batata Samrat ko jisse tum shaadi karne ja rahe vo mujhe pe fida hain vo tumko last moment pe pata chal raha hain wow👏

Samrat & family - tumpe Fida hain samrat se shaadi ke liye kyu ha kardi .tumpe fida hain to sangeet pe fully dress hoke kyu aayi , why she is still continuing with d marriage function

Virat - kya answer dena chahiye tha virat ko .

Samrat pakhi se shaadi kar raha tha na ki virat se . It was pakhi who should tell samrat not virat .

Virat ko nhi pata pakhi ditched samrat from first meeting only .

Coming to vaada thing virat ne option diya tha , usse accept karna hain ki nhi pakhi ka decision tha & she had chance to move out still she choose her own benefit.

Virat nhi to samrat ye rule pakhi follow kar rahi hain.

Samrat fell in love with pakhi's outer beauty , he was all gaga over her , see d phone call of samrat virat during samrakhi first meeting it was virat who asked samrat to take time before saying yes thou he dint know it was pakhi.

Everything was finalized before virat came in .

If virat dint gave vaada still she would had married samrat just to be near virat.

actually i agree with deepika on this.

it was not virat’s responsibility to reveal the truth about their relationship to samrat. it was all pakhi’s. she decided to get married to him without getting over virat. also she could have refused anytime samrat, bhavani or her father asked repeatedly. the only fault of virat is giving that vaada to pakhi. he might have done it in desperation but still it was wrong. he did not pressurise her. it was not virat who was getting married. so he does not hold any moral responsibility if he keeps loving someone or decide to move on at later point of time.

but pakhi was getting married to someone. that someone always held her in high regards and kept asking her if she was ok with marriage. but she lied through her teeth every single time.

yes samrat was wrong in running away from the confrontation. we all have discussed at some point that it is the younger chavans upbringing which makes them avoid such confrontations. he sould have either made effort or end the relationship. he was wrong in abondoning his family for a woman who betrayed him.

yes, i agree that pakhi hates sai because she feels sai is taking her place. but where are her morals. whatever the circumstances sai and virat got married, it is between them. she has no right to expect things from virat, least of all expect him to keep loving her. she might not feel married to samrat, but virat is and it is wrong on any level to keep any expectations from him. if she was sensible, she would think, why am i running behind a person who did not want to fight for our love, who clearly has no feelings for me. why should she behave like a perfect bahu playing puppet to bk and gang when initially she was not so? i think it is to show virat how she is more suitable. but what she doesn’t understand is virat is now unattainable to her. she might try all she want but that bridge has been burnt long back and cannot be built.

Samrat should have just divorced Pakhi and left . Poor guy got the biggest shock of his life during what was supposed to be the happiest day . It must have been shattering and we still want or expect him to act all understanding and give the other person a chance. He is not a saint and just a human. He dealt with it the, the way he did thinking that he is giving what his wife wants. But leaving caused his family members lot of pain, for that he is wrong.

We say Sai should move past the deal and be with Virat. But the difference is Virat was honest from the beginning atleast to her about the truth. So however hard she knew what she was getting into.

samrat was clueless. His inner dialogues were so apt when he realised the truth. Guess he is human in not being the bigger person.

Even the ML FL are flawed with their moral compass not skewed completely.

I really hope she wakes up from her delusion soon.

I loved reading everyone’s perspectives though. It was interesting :)