Originally posted by: backtobetter
It's not for Aastha to decide whether Shaurya needs his dad or her or both. Makers have failed to show a logical reason behind Aastha abandoning her son. A victim of patriarchy is one who succumbs to it. A woman with the courage to fight against it is a fighter. In Aastha's case she fought for her rights and stood by them but didn't fight for her son. Court case would have been hard but with his mother on his side may be the child would have faced it better than growing up thinking the mother never wanted him. Also Aastha knew that the Sabarwal house was a toxic hellhole and she still left her son behind in that house. In a court case Devi or Tej would have had no say. I doubt Shaan would have fought against her and asked for the custody.
Yes it's a fictional character but since we are trying to analyse the characters, especially this trio, this is my perception of Aastha. A strong woman but a weak mother/parent. So far makers didn't show any scenes or storylines to show otherwise. As a parent she was selfish.
Anokhi's mother never fought for her rights and is a victim of patriarchy. But when it came to her daughter she showed the courage and conviction to fight against the system and give her the life she wanted. She was a weak woman as a wife but a strong and selfless mother.
I can't believe I am arguing over a fictional character 🤔.
It is just that Aastha's character attributes don't go with leaving her son just because she did not care. She can put her life and reputation at risk for a girl she has known just for like a year but she could not fight for her son. It is difficult to put this Aastha and that Aastha together. And trust me even I have been bothered about why she did not fight for him enough ever since Mohor, more than a year back. I had wished they showed a more valid reason for her giving up or at the least shown that she went to court but lost. Ideally she should have fought. Not fighting does not go at all with her character. She did not lack courage or conviction. So what was she lacking in? Motherly emotions? That is also doubtful given how much she yearns for her son. If she had been that indifferent, she would not even care to talk to him even when they met in Gurdaspur. That is why I had to come to a plausible explanation with whatever little information we have got to save myself from the cognitivedissonance regarding her character. It may not necessarily satisfy others.
Sabharwals are oppressive true, but their oppression in directed more towards the women whose freedom is restricted. Men are free to do as they like. Shaan grew up fine in that house, atleast fine enough to make her love and marry him and still be in love with him after 25 years. Shaan may believe in certain gender stereotypes but he respects women and is not a misogynist. It is true Shaan did not fight for Aastha because he could not openly go against his brother. But in Shaurya's case, if Devi or Tej filled his mind with wrong ideas, Shaan could always correct him in private. Aastha trusted Shaan to do this much. And mentality is not shaped by upbringing alone. People go out, meet people, teachers, friends, and their attitudes change. Not everyone coming out of a misogynist household turns out to be a misogynist. With time and education, our perspective changes. Siblings brought up in the same house can have different mentality. Case in point, Anokhi never gave up on her dreams but Babli did. Aastha did not know Devi was so insecure and manipulative, if we believe their conversation in the hospital.
I think the biggest reason was the court case. Court verdict in our country is not always just. If Shaan did not want to fight a court case against Aastha then he should have told it when Tej threatened Aastha with the court case. Rich and powerful people can get away with a lot of wrongdoing by hiring expensive lawyers. Tej would pull a lot of strings to win the case, defame Aastha, even accuse her of adultery. Even if Shaurya would have Aastha by his side, she would not be able to protect him from being witness to all this. If you have seen the movie Kramer vs Kramer, the parents suffer a lot of character attacks to win the child's custody but when the child was called to the court, the father gives up the custody because he did not want the child to suffer a grueling cross examination. Here too Aastha's decision was based on similar considerations.
I don't know if I have covered all the points. It has already become too big. In the end I agree with you that Aastha owes an apology to Shaurya because whatever the reasons for her decision, Shaurya did suffer. Nothing can negate that.