ViHeer Reunion....what can we expect 🥰❤️😀 - Page 27

Originally posted by: burnnotice

Jigyasa not shooting? From her IG story, I thought she was on her way to the set🤔 And Rubina really said that she’s in the driver’s seat? Whoaaaa! My interest is waning n if Heer is not shown, that’s it for me. Nonsense!

I assume she is not shooting based on a post by the actress who is playing Preeto in which she was asking her to come quickly. The post is from today. Maybe she was just generally speaking, but to me, it seemed like she was missing Jigyasa and there is still some time until she will come back.

Also, this weekend I've come across a fan asking one of Shakti's team member when Virat and Heer will be back, and he replied that in a month!!! I can't really imagine what they are actually planning to do, show them lying in hospital bed in a vegetative state for a month?!!! Because a whole month is a lot of time. I hope they change their mind regarding this part.

Yes, this is what Rubina said, she said that she left the show because with the leap "the responsibility was to be with someone else" (referring most probably to the grown-up Heer) and that she "likes to take the entire responsibility of the show" so, she opted out as she didn't want "to be seated in the adjacent seat". But, now she is "back in the driver’s seat". I am quoting from one of her recent interview.

Originally posted by: Etna_Dia

I assume she is not shooting based on a post by the actress who is playing Preeto in which she was asking her to come quickly. The post is from today. Maybe she was just generally speaking, but to me, it seemed like she was missing Jigyasa and there is still some time until she will come back.

Also, this weekend I've come across a fan asking one of Shakti's team member when Virat and Heer will be back, and he replied that in a month!!! I can't really imagine what they are actually planning to do, show them lying in hospital bed in a vegetative state for a month?!!! Because a whole month is a lot of time. I hope they change their mind regarding this part.

Yes, this is what Rubina said, she said that she left the show because with the leap "the responsibility was to be with someone else" (referring most probably to the grown-up Heer) and that she "likes to take the entire responsibility of the show" so, she opted out as she didn't want "to be seated in the adjacent seat". But, now she is "back in the driver’s seat". I am quoting from one of her recent interview.

You blew my mind. Yes, saw Kamya Ma’am’s post n then Jigyasa posted a few hrs after, so I assumed she was on her way to the set. But with that reply from the Shakti team member, I’m speechless. Maybe, it will be all about S n A now. A fight to be the Queen of the Kinnars 🤣😎

About R’s interview......absolutely no humility. Hubris jumped out like poof 🙄🙄😳😳 No apologies from my side.

Originally posted by: Etna_Dia

Among all this negativity, maybe is good to bring Saumya back, as long as they'll show her living a fulfilling life despite being a kinnar and a widow. Until now, I think that they haven't presented even a single successful kinnar, even too in real life there are. My concern is that they will sideline Heer and Virat again, and that they may show Saumya as some sort of gangster kinnar because these makers think that kinnars can be "successful" only in this type of "jobs".

Originally posted by: burnnotice

You blew my mind. Yes, saw Kamya Ma’am’s post n then Jigyasa posted a few hrs after, so I assumed she was on her way to the set. But with that reply from the Shakti team member, I’m speechless. Maybe, it will be all about S n A now. A fight to be the Queen of the Kinnars 🤣😎

About R’s interview......absolutely no humility. Hubris jumped out like poof 🙄🙄😳😳 No apologies from my side.

Yes, Rubina sounds overconfident in this interview. I think she has a point because "Shakti" was a huge success during her time, but she should also take in consideration the fact that if there is still a show to come back to is because of the hard work and dedication of the current cast. There can be room for everyone, but, unfortunately, as we know Shakti's creative team is not good at handle multiple characters at once. I am afraid that they will end up frustrating both Saumya and Viheer's fans.

Originally posted by: Etna_Dia

Yes, Rubina sounds overconfident in this interview. I think she has a point because "Shakti" was a huge success during her time, but she should also take in consideration the fact that if there is still a show to come back to is because of the hard work and dedication of the current cast. There can be room for everyone, but, unfortunately, as we know Shakti's creative team is not good at handle multiple characters at once. I am afraid that they will end up frustrating both Saumya and Viheer's fans.

But #shakti on Twitter.....ppl post old trp charts n at some point the show was in the dumps. I’ve seen ratings as low as 1.1 😳😳

No doubt they cannot handle multiple families. I said it in the beginning, they had it easy with Harman, as he hadn’t to move so everything revolved around his home. Heer was different, especially after her marriage. How would they maintain the original family/main cast was my issue? And we know how that panned out. A disaster....then they added A...a further disaster n disgrace.

Originally posted by: burnnotice

But #shakti on Twitter.....ppl post old trp charts n at some point the show was in the dumps. I’ve seen ratings as low as 1.1 😳😳

No doubt they cannot handle multiple families. I said it in the beginning, they had it easy with Harman, as he hadn’t to move so everything revolved around his home. Heer was different, especially after her marriage. How would they maintain the original family/main cast was my issue? And we know how that panned out. A disaster....then they added A...a further disaster n disgrace.

I had no clue that "Shakti" used to have such low ratings. No one has mentioned it before. Now I am fully convinced that they only care to keep the show going on and nothing else. It doesn't matter what the story is, as long as the show is still on air. They should have ended the show when the ratings were that low with a happy ending for Harman and Saumya. But no, they twisted and twisted until they managed somehow to grab the audience's attention again. It's exactly what they are trying to do now as well.

Originally posted by: Etna_Dia

I had no clue that "Shakti" used to have such low ratings. No one has mentioned it before. Now I am fully convinced that they only care to keep the show going on and nothing else. It doesn't matter what the story is, as long as the show is still on air. They should have ended the show when the ratings were that low with a happy ending for Harman and Saumya. But no, they twisted and twisted until they managed somehow to grab the audience's attention again. It's exactly what they are trying to do now as well.

Don’t let me tell you how shocked I was . I thought it was Season 2 ratings until I saw the other shows listed, all off air now. If you go through the hashtag, you’ll see for yourself. It used to be a dead # but with R’s return, it’s busy. So you’ll have some scrolling down to do. 😁

If they’re gonna pull another one month MIA for the leads, I will tell them off n quit. It’s unfair to have the actors work so hard in Season 2 n suddenly sideline them. I bashed them for S, n I’m not even his fan...much less J. Surprisingly, tomorrow’s WU is not uploaded. 🤔

Originally posted by: burnnotice

But #shakti on Twitter.....ppl post old trp charts n at some point the show was in the dumps. I’ve seen ratings as low as 1.1 😳😳

No doubt they cannot handle multiple families. I said it in the beginning, they had it easy with Harman, as he hadn’t to move so everything revolved around his home. Heer was different, especially after her marriage. How would they maintain the original family/main cast was my issue? And we know how that panned out. A disaster....then they added A...a further disaster n disgrace.

Yes shakti had law trp but after 2.7 or 2.8 yrs bcoz of stupid writing till 2.8 yrs it was above 3 or 2.5 and only for few weeks it was 1.1.

it was stable in 4 week and shakti was backed to slot leader when it was competiting with kasauti on that time, but with viheer story it become below 2 in few months

when Vivian,rubi left the show they gave above 2 in hands on new leads not 1.1 with leap trp increased but only for few points which maintained only for few weeks and now it's falling continuously never become stable again.

In Haya time even after 1.1 after 4 weeks shakti was managed to bring 2+ trp again but now it's falling plainly without any break and I don't blame actors for it it's all happening bcoz of stupid writing

Trp is not depend on actors it's depend on story teller and writer with Haya time hastag was full of life but with haya leave it become dead in past shakti and Haya was very popular couple

I don't think now rubi return going to save the show but she is not coming herself it's makers and channel who approached her in a hope to increase trp and maybe told her to gave this type of interview to get old fans back

Originally posted by: Shalini_Taarey

Yes shakti had law trp but after 2.7 or 2.8 yrs bcoz of stupid writing till 2.8 yrs it was above 3 or 2.5 and only for few weeks it was 1.1.

it was stable in 4 week and shakti was backed to slot leader when it was competiting with kasauti on that time, but with viheer story it become below 2 in few months

when Vivian,rubi left the show they gave above 2 in hands on new leads not 1.1 with leap trp increased but only for few points which maintained only for few weeks and now it's falling continuously never become stable again.

In Haya time even after 1.1 after 4 weeks shakti was managed to bring 2+ trp again but now it's falling plainly without any break and I don't blame actors for it it's all happening bcoz of stupid writing

Trp is not depend on actors it's depend on story teller and writer with Haya time hastag was full of life but with haya leave it become dead in past shakti and Haya was very popular couple

I don't think now rubi return going to save the show but she is not coming herself it's makers and channel who approached her in a hope to increase trp and maybe told her to gave this type of interview to get old fans back

That's why I am saying that they should end it and give it a happy conclusion. Five years is more than enough and all they do is repeating the story of season one with some variations. Harman and Saumya were also harmed and presumed dead for some time. They've never delivered a strong message that kinnars should be treated with dignity and that the babies kinnars should be kept in families no matter what, on the contrary, they showed the kinnars in very humiliating situations. Maybe with the closing of the show, they will be forced to deliver a positive message for kinnars.

Originally posted by: Etna_Dia

That's why I am saying that they should end it and give it a happy conclusion. Five years is more than enough and all they do is repeating the story of season one with some variations. Harman and Saumya were also harmed and presumed dead for some time. They've never delivered a strong message that kinnars should be treated with dignity and that the babies kinnars should be kept in families no matter what, on the contrary, they showed the kinnars in very humiliating situations. Maybe with the closing of the show, they will be forced to deliver a positive message for kinnars.

Shakti writers no where closed to reality all they care about money which I realised long back.

In India kinnars have right to do job they become govt officials also higher officials but shakti cvs never showed this angle even now a days parents have full right to keep kinnar child with them legally and no one forced kinnars to come in community like shown in shakti especially in this era with time people mentality changed but shakti CVS still stuck in 10th century.

They don't want to end it bcoz they think it's a money making machine

but calling saumya entry is disgrace is not right.

viheer also get a successful show bcoz of Rubi and Vivian hard work they carried show for 3.5 yrs and made it successful it's hard to carry a new show but easy to carry a already successful show