Does Arshi deserve punishment from Bigg Boss for her acts?

PangaNaLe thumbnail
Own Your Stories Participant Thumbnail 5th Anniversary Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 4 years ago
#1

She was provoking Vikas all the time. That might be irritating, but it's not against the rules.

She threatened that she would reveal his family's secret on national television. I'm not sure if this is against the rules or not, because Bigg Boss and Salman bash contestants for this based on their convenience and favoritism.

But threatening to bring outside matters inside the house is previously done by Jasmin, Kavita and Nikki. They didn't face repurcussions or bashing from Salman for that.

She was touching Vikas without his permission. Even after getting warning from Bigg Boss she didn't mend her ways.

That is harassment and also against the rules. But this is something done by contestants all the time when they get into heated arguments and fights. Bigg Boss never punishes them for that.

So just because Vikas got evicted for throwing Arshi in the pool, and people could relate to him as no one could've tolerated her if in his place, Arshi should face punishment?

Does Arshi really deserve any punishment for her any acts? Did she really crossed limits which no contestant previously did?

If Arshi gets punishment or faces eviction for this, then it would only be a revenge for what she did with Vikas and to serve some sort of justice, which won't really be a justice in the eyes of everyone.

Edited by Harley_Quinn - 4 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

8

Views

874

Users

4

Likes

4

Frequent Posters

Candy_Crush thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago
#2

BB atleast nominate to karte or given some punishment then it would been fair.. there were issues from both parties

ayaan786 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 4 years ago
#3

your argument in a nutshell


-arshi touching him without his consent

- including outside matters specially family matter inappropriately

its against the rules BUT its happened before so its fine


lol

with that logic vikas also only did a slight push which happened before too

last season asim and sid were literally sweeping each other of their feet with their pushes and nobody received any punishment there so why punish vikas?


see? it can go both ways

Tinder thumbnail
5th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago
#4

We only watch the episode for an hour, they live inside 24hrs. We only get to see a peak of their daily lives. You can use FOE, but when you constantly abuse that to provoke a person that is unbearable. Technically she didn’t break any rules but she did cross her limit today. Vikas is bisexual, and his family has a problem with his sexuality.. this is obviously a sensitive thing to him, arshi was literally blackmailing him, anyone would lose their cool.

PangaNaLe thumbnail
Own Your Stories Participant Thumbnail 5th Anniversary Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 4 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: ayaan786

your argument in a nutshell


-arshi touching him without his consent

- including outside matters specially family matter inappropriately

its against the rules BUT its happened before so its fine


lol

with that logic vikas also only did a slight push which happened before too

last season asim and sid were literally sweeping each other of their feet with their pushes and nobody received any punishment there so why punish vikas?


see? it can go both ways

Did Asim and Sid threw each other in pool?

Also I didn't say it's against rules to bring outside matters. I said I'm not sure.

Edited by Harley_Quinn - 4 years ago
ayaan786 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 4 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: Harley_Quinn

Did Asim and Sid threw each other in pool?

there just happened to be a pool in the way when vikas pushed arshi ;)


things can be turned and twisted around the way people want


but that wasnt really my point

just because something happened before and wasnt punished accordingly dosent mean that is the new norm now and should never be punished ever

ayaan786 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 4 years ago
#7

it dosent matter if you are referring this season or the ones before

my point still stands


i used that example to show you how ridiculous your argument sounds

PangaNaLe thumbnail
Own Your Stories Participant Thumbnail 5th Anniversary Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 4 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: ayaan786

it dosent matter if you are referring this season or the ones before

my point still stands


i used that example to show you how ridiculous your argument sounds

There is nothing ridiculous in my argument.
And yes, it does matter if it's this season or previous season, because one season can have different rules than the other one.

If Arshi gets punishment for her acts, then it would be unfair to her because contestants OF THIS SEASON were not punished previously.

What happened in previous season, maybe it was allowed in that season, which isn't allowed now.

So your point stands nowhere.

ayaan786 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 4 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: Harley_Quinn

There is nothing ridiculous in my argument.
And yes, it does matter if it's this season or previous season, because one season can have different rules than the other one.

If Arshi gets punishment for her acts, then it would be unfair to her because contestants OF THIS SEASON were not punished previously.

What happened in previous season, maybe it was allowed in that season, which isn't allowed now.

So your point stands nowhere.

rules are not set every season they are supposed to stay the same every time you know?

it would be unfair to who? who other contestant went this far?


i dont think you even understood my point so ill repeat it for you

just because someone did wrong before and it wasnt punished dosent mean that the act should not be punished ever

bb was surely wrong for not punishing the act before but is definitely NOT wrong in applying justice now


imagine if we go by your logic in real life

if one guy steals but gets away with it because he has connections does that mean nobody should be punished for stealing?


can you see now how ridiculous your point is?

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".