Prabhudeva all set to marry his niece after 9 years of 1st divorce - Page 4

Originally posted by: cutejodikangal

If you are so against it, by all means don’t participate in it. What is this jabardasti ka asking everyone else to follow your rule?

I didn't ask anyone to follow any rule 😆. You claimed it wasn't chi because Arjun did it.

I just told you it was and why.

BTW, a lot of governments do have laws against it. Ie, jabardasti they do tell you you can't.

Originally posted by: Talis

It is far more likely to happen when there have been generations of intermarriage. Hence common genetic weaknesses in communities with a culture of intermarriage - be it an isolated village or the Royal families of Europe.

Any level of consanguinity increases the risk of diseases. It goes up as generations keep intermarrying.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/consanguinity

all this discussion but the article says nothing

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

Confused what this has to do with Trump.

Living in 22nd century.

I always feel Prabhudeva is a classic case of MCP. For men the younger the girl is better it gets. 🤢

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

I didn't ask anyone to follow any rule 😆. You claimed it wasn't chi because Arjun did it.

I just told you it was and why.

BTW, a lot of governments do have laws against it. Ie, jabardasti they do tell you you can't.

Not a lot, compared to the governments and countries that made it legal.

You just told me why 'you think’ it’s chi and I told you why ‘i think’ it’s not. Bottomline? It's a personal preference!

Originally posted by: cutejodikangal

Not a lot, compared to the governments and countries that made it legal.

You just told me why 'you think’ it’s chi and I told you why ‘i think’ it’s not. Bottomline? It's a personal preference!

Scientific reality doesn't allow personal preferences

Science says inbreeding causes diseases.

That is fact. Not personal preference.

The only place for personal preference in this topic would be the morality question, but I didn't mention it in any of the posts.

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

Scientific reality doesn't allow personal preferences

Science says inbreeding causes diseases.

That is fact. Not personal preference.

The only place for personal preference in this topic would be the morality question, but I didn't mention it in any of the posts.

Whatever you mean by that.

Science says fried food is detrimental to health but people still indulge in it. And fried food is more indulged than cousin marriages btw! Have you stopped indulging in it? You means not just you, I am talking about everyone who is concerned about scientific facts.

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

Confused what this has to do with Trump.

His supporters share his IQ level.

Originally posted by: cutejodikangal

Whatever you mean by that.

Science says fried food is detrimental to health but people still indulge in it. And fried food is more indulged than cousin marriages btw! Have you stopped indulging in it? You means not just you, I am talking about everyone who is concerned about scientific facts.

Reality is unheallthy habits and consangunity breed diseases. It is not a matter of opinion.

But irresponsibility is certainly a life choice. Have at it, I guess.