Originally posted by: deepikagupta9
Even I find it weird that u have problem with my posts , it always start arguing with me without giving d proof . I had been noticing it continuously . First u argued in ur topic regarding Garuda being protector of amrit which is not d truth iska koi frictional version nhi hai lord Vishnu is protector of amrit & later he handed to devta , amrit comes under protection of devraj indra , Garuda protected amrit only from snakes later gave back to indra & got a boon from him .which u argued a lot if u remember.
Garuda was shown as the protector of Amrit in Vighnarhart Ganesh, the Garuda clan was also shown as defenders of Amrit in Mahakumbh.
Indra does protect amrit, but he and all the other gods lost to Garuda when it came to the same, which is why after Indra, Garuda is also entrusted with the task of guarding it.
Second coming to arguments, I have seen you post a lot of half baked info which you go around claiming as true. Earlier you were saying Bela is the only Naagrani which is absolutely not true as we have seen.
Point out where did I said sheshnaag is undefeated infact I only informed his defeat from meghnath.
In your previous post only you were like where is it written that Vasuki is undefeated? So I am asking you back in return where is it written that Sheshnaag is undefeated, because you have actually written that look Sheshnaag is undefeated so he is greater than Vasuki. Yes you did write it.
Kissi se defeat hona koi gunaah nhi hai but u r busy painting Vasuki like he is so powerful that no one can defeat I agree there many version but none of version will say something which never happened .
My dear even I agree that it is not a sin to get defeated by anyone. Infact Sheshnaag was even shown losing to lord Ganesh in vighnaharta Ganesh. But you were the one who kept repeating like a parrot look, Vasuki was defeated, Sheshnaag is undefeated so Sheshnaag is greater.
Thank god vinnas informed it was shown in DKMD lord shiv & Vishnu started a fight after Garuda & Vasuki.
Vinata mother of Garuda & aruna asked a boon from her husband sage Kashyap that her 2 sons will be more powerful than kadru 1000 naags sons .
Sheshaag dint have any encounter with meghnath in his real form coz he dint reside in paatal , ye har jagah likha hai ki he resides in vaikuntha. He left paatalok & went vaikuntha after that Vasuki started ruling .
See here you go again, you are narrating a version that suits you only and are going around claiming that it is true, in that case I can argue as well that Vasuki never had a daughter so he did not fight with Meghnath either. There are two reasons why Vasuki rests on Lord Shiva’s neck, one is because he was blessed by lord Shiva for being a devotee and his selflessness during the amrit manthan, second because of the curse given by lord Brahma according to which they could appear on the surface, but the snakes kept coming out and then Garuda went after them because Lord Vishnu ordered him to do so, which is why there was a fight between Garuda and Vasuki. Vasuki actually had the guts to fight with Garuda just to save his clan from extinction. And when he was about to get killed he invoked aloes Shiva who came to protect him and kill Garuda. Seeing this even Vishnu had entered the ground and a battle between Vishnu and shiva ensued which ended with both the sides retreating and Shiva granting and offering protection to Vasuki, so Vasuki would never get out of kailash and endanger him self so it can’t be him either who fought with Meghnath.
Meghnath was born in tretayug sheshnaag left paatalok & started residing in vaikuntha in satyug itself. It was wrongly written that's why I pointed out . Really sorry to inform u Meghnath can't enter vaikuntha till lord Vishnu grant him permission. I doubt any version will say Meghnath before his birth fought with sheshnaag
Vasuki no doubt is very powerful & great king but aisa nhi ki koi nhi hara sakta nor he has any such boon or getting defeated will make him less powerful.
U keep saying Vasuki passed his throne to takshak , yes it happened 4 sure but lord shiv asked him resume his duties as naagraj so he obeyed him , it's his dedication only that he is following lord shiv orders .
Chalo maan liya that he resumed his duties as king because Lord Shiva asked him to do so, but that doesn’t mean he fought with Meghnath nor did he rape anyone.
Vasuki is king of all naags takshak is king of sarps .
U kept on arguing Garuda having enimity with sheshnaag , & he tolerate sheshnaag coz of lord Vishnu when I told Garuda save sheshnaag u said it was compulsion, I mean really , I again proved why Garuda can't have enimity with sheshnaag & much to ur disappointment u can't argue further coz geeta don't have frictional versions .
My dear please tell me if Garuda and Sheshnaag were to fight, who is going to win? And if Sheshnaag and Lord Vishnu are one then why did Vishnu cut off one of his heads?
Next u kept on arguing unlimited hoods things yes Vasuki had unlimited hoods 4 sure but not more than sheshnaag coz sheshnaag has no end that's why he is called adi anant sheshnaag. Initial or I say very first name of sheshnaag is naagraj anant . I was expecting to hear adi anant is used for Vasuki too.
Vasuki does have unlimited hoods too, if they are unlimited now, how can they be more or less than Sheshnaag’s?? Vasuki holds no such title however that doesn’t make him less or Sheshnaag superior. If you say Sheshnaag is someone that is considered to be the alpha and omega that Vasuki represents the endless circle of life and death, kundalini shakti.
When u argue anything related mytho then definitely u have to give d reference where it is written .
What reference have you given me that you are asking others around for references? You are only giving references of your favorite verses and dismissing others.
It's better first u see urself then point fingers on other.
I would say you should practice what you preach yourself
Yes we can agree to disagree .
That i agree.