Naagraj Vasuki - Page 6

Created

Last reply

Replies

61

Views

8.4k

Users

8

Likes

48

Frequent Posters

vinnas thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 5 years ago
#51

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9


Ya it was d final war b/w lakshman & meghnath if nikumladevi yagya of meghnath was completed then no one can defeat him as he would had got divine chariot & weapons.


Lord Ram asked hanuman & vanar sena to destroy it as vibhishan informed them what Kind of powers meghnath will get after yagya completion.



After beheading & killing meghnath still lakshman anger was not getting over , he refused to give meghnath head to raavan family 4 last rites, then Sulochana came to meet lakshman that time lord ram made lakshman remind his sheshaag form , his anger towards meghnath & connection with Sulochana later he gave meghnath's head to Sulochana & she committed sati.

Dont know Lakshman Anger issue mostly its indrajeet prepared for his death after he realised Ram -Lakshman never ordinary humans His fate sealed in their hands then final attempt of Nikumladevi yagna too incomplete 😎 He tried to advice Ravan to give back Sitamaa but Ravan as usual refused

After lakshman chopped his head meghanath appeared Ravan court with head to say final bye

Sulochana after learning it's none other than Seshnag her own Done this 😲😭 No complain accepted her fate too then forwarded Sati .

Fruitcustard_9 thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 5 years ago
#52

Originally posted by: vinnas

Dont know Lakshman Anger issue mostly its indrajeet prepared for his death after he realised Ram -Lakshman never ordinary humans His fate sealed in their hands then final attempt of Nikumladevi yagna too incomplete 😎 He tried to advice Ravan to give back Sitamaa but Ravan as usual refused

After lakshman chopped his head meghanath appeared Ravan court with head to say final bye

Sulochana after learning it's none other than Seshnag her own Done this 😲😭 No complain accepted her fate too then forwarded Sati .


Ya ur right That was illusion of meghnath's head which came to warn raavan . Meghnath's chopped hand fell before Sulochana & she with her power made meghnath's chopped hand to write & tell who killed meghnath , how he died


Ye dono cheez Ramanand Sagar showed in his serials .


U r right meghnath kumkaran both tried to stop raavan & warn him but he dint listened anyone

Edited by deepikagupta9 - 5 years ago
vinnas thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 5 years ago
#53

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9


That was illusion of meghnath's head which came to warn raavan . Meghnath's chopped hand fell before Sulochana & she with her power made meghnath's chopped hand to write & tell who killed meghnath .


Ye dono cheez Ramanand Sagar showed in his serials .


U r right meghnath kumkaran both tried to stop raavan & warn raavan but he dint listened anyone

way before serials most of mytho films shown Indrajeet head talked Ravan, sulochana without word followed Sati . Not seen Ramanand show 😊
Fruitcustard_9 thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 5 years ago
#54

Originally posted by: vinnas

way before serials most of mytho films shown Indrajeet head talked Ravan, sulochana without word followed Sati . Not seen Ramanand show 😊


I don't know about mytho films but what u said about head think is definitely true coz it's is mentioned in ramayan 2, u won't believe his head insulted raavan 😆 later it vanished


@vinnas


Had u heard Bahubali makers r making film lord ram life , prabas is playing lord ram I guess & saif ali khan as raavan😆

vinnas thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 5 years ago
#55

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9


I don't know about mytho films but what u said about head think is definitely true coz it's is mentioned in ramayan 2, u won't believe his head insulted raavan 😆 later it vanished


@vinnas


Had u heard Bahubali makers r making film lord ram life , prabas is playing lord ram I guess & saif ali khan as raavan😆

yes I believe old movies at time of 60s & 70s made 😛which have no purpose to alter written stories His head vanished after final tata bye 😎

Lakshman Anger issue mostly shown when Sitaswayamwar time next Sitamaa searching time delay by Vanarsena😛


heard prabas in adipurush movie gonna play as Ram &saif Ravan but is it by BB makers 😲

Fruitcustard_9 thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 5 years ago
#56

Originally posted by: vinnas

yes I believe old movies at time of 60s & 70s made 😛which have no purpose to alter written stories His head vanished after final tata bye 😎

Lakshman Anger issue mostly shown when Sitaswayamwar time next Sitamaa searching time delay by Vanarsena😛


heard prabas in adipurush movie gonna play as Ram &saif Ravan but is it by BB makers 😲


There r many incidents of lakshman's anger in ramayan.


What I heard film is from Rajamouli , we have to wait.



My original question was ekta should show Vasuki not sheshaag as Vasuki is actual protector of naagmani & he directly associated with lord shiv.


If u had seen chandrakanta of ekta kapoor in thar Garuda was shown


Maybe Garuda comes to meet veer , as acc 2 me it will be veer who will guide his clan towards right side & pull them out of darkness as he is prince .

Edited by deepikagupta9 - 5 years ago
vinnas thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 5 years ago
#57

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9


There r many incidents of lakshman's anger in ramayan.


What I heard film is from Rajamouli , we have to wait.



My original question was ekta should show Vasuki not sheshaag as Vasuki is actual protector of naagmani & he directly associated with lord shiv.


If u had seen chandrakanta of ekta kapoor in thar Garuda was shown


Maybe Garuda comes to meet veer , as acc 2 me it will be veer who will guide his clan towards right side & pull them out of darkness as he is prince .


Yes lakshman angry towards Bharat 😊.

Surpanaka 😈


no Rajamouli is part of Prabhas movie


Prabhas is all set to team up with director Om Raut for a 3D action drama, titled Adipurush. Produced by T series Bhushan Kumar. The tagline of the movie reads, “Celebrating the victory of good over evil.”😊


Ekta nagin series adopted Seshnag Main Deity serving Shivji 😲and Nagmani main property since Day 1 along with BB Song BG 😛 no hope it transform Now by this makers to Vasuki😛

Life ok chandrakanta and colors chandrakanta both seen initial epis😆No idea garuda shown or not


May be in future epis or finale time Garuda comes to guide Veer cheel prince 😳 Tab tak VAni with 3angles ,Mus 😆

Edited by vinnas - 5 years ago
Fruitcustard_9 thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 5 years ago
#58

Originally posted by: vinnas

no Rajamouli is part of Prabhas movie


Prabhas is all set to team up with director Om Raut for a 3D action drama, titled Adipurush. Produced by T series Bhushan Kumar. The tagline of the movie reads, “Celebrating the victory of good over evil.”😊


Ekta nagin series adopted Seshnag Main Deity serving Shivji 😲and Nagmani main property since Day 1 along with BB Song BG 😛 no hope it transform Now by this makers to Vasuki😛

Life ok chandrakanta and colors chandrakanta both seen initial epis😆No idea garuda shown or not


May be in future epis or finale time Garuda comes to guide Veer cheel prince 😳 Tab tak VAni with 3angles ,Mus 😆


Color 's Chandrakanta was of ekta kapoor , Madhurima tuli & Vishal Aditya Singh played lead roles , usme Garuda was shown.

Rein123 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#59

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9


Even I find it weird that u have problem with my posts , it always start arguing with me without giving d proof . I had been noticing it continuously . First u argued in ur topic regarding Garuda being protector of amrit which is not d truth iska koi frictional version nhi hai lord Vishnu is protector of amrit & later he handed to devta , amrit comes under protection of devraj indra , Garuda protected amrit only from snakes later gave back to indra & got a boon from him .which u argued a lot if u remember.

Garuda was shown as the protector of Amrit in Vighnarhart Ganesh, the Garuda clan was also shown as defenders of Amrit in Mahakumbh.

Indra does protect amrit, but he and all the other gods lost to Garuda when it came to the same, which is why after Indra, Garuda is also entrusted with the task of guarding it.


Second coming to arguments, I have seen you post a lot of half baked info which you go around claiming as true. Earlier you were saying Bela is the only Naagrani which is absolutely not true as we have seen.

Point out where did I said sheshnaag is undefeated infact I only informed his defeat from meghnath.

In your previous post only you were like where is it written that Vasuki is undefeated? So I am asking you back in return where is it written that Sheshnaag is undefeated, because you have actually written that look Sheshnaag is undefeated so he is greater than Vasuki. Yes you did write it.

Kissi se defeat hona koi gunaah nhi hai but u r busy painting Vasuki like he is so powerful that no one can defeat I agree there many version but none of version will say something which never happened .

My dear even I agree that it is not a sin to get defeated by anyone. Infact Sheshnaag was even shown losing to lord Ganesh in vighnaharta Ganesh. But you were the one who kept repeating like a parrot look, Vasuki was defeated, Sheshnaag is undefeated so Sheshnaag is greater.

Thank god vinnas informed it was shown in DKMD lord shiv & Vishnu started a fight after Garuda & Vasuki.


Vinata mother of Garuda & aruna asked a boon from her husband sage Kashyap that her 2 sons will be more powerful than kadru 1000 naags sons .


Sheshaag dint have any encounter with meghnath in his real form coz he dint reside in paatal , ye har jagah likha hai ki he resides in vaikuntha. He left paatalok & went vaikuntha after that Vasuki started ruling .

See here you go again, you are narrating a version that suits you only and are going around claiming that it is true, in that case I can argue as well that Vasuki never had a daughter so he did not fight with Meghnath either. There are two reasons why Vasuki rests on Lord Shiva’s neck, one is because he was blessed by lord Shiva for being a devotee and his selflessness during the amrit manthan, second because of the curse given by lord Brahma according to which they could appear on the surface, but the snakes kept coming out and then Garuda went after them because Lord Vishnu ordered him to do so, which is why there was a fight between Garuda and Vasuki. Vasuki actually had the guts to fight with Garuda just to save his clan from extinction. And when he was about to get killed he invoked aloes Shiva who came to protect him and kill Garuda. Seeing this even Vishnu had entered the ground and a battle between Vishnu and shiva ensued which ended with both the sides retreating and Shiva granting and offering protection to Vasuki, so Vasuki would never get out of kailash and endanger him self so it can’t be him either who fought with Meghnath.

Meghnath was born in tretayug sheshnaag left paatalok & started residing in vaikuntha in satyug itself. It was wrongly written that's why I pointed out . Really sorry to inform u Meghnath can't enter vaikuntha till lord Vishnu grant him permission. I doubt any version will say Meghnath before his birth fought with sheshnaag


Vasuki no doubt is very powerful & great king but aisa nhi ki koi nhi hara sakta nor he has any such boon or getting defeated will make him less powerful.


U keep saying Vasuki passed his throne to takshak , yes it happened 4 sure but lord shiv asked him resume his duties as naagraj so he obeyed him , it's his dedication only that he is following lord shiv orders .

Chalo maan liya that he resumed his duties as king because Lord Shiva asked him to do so, but that doesn’t mean he fought with Meghnath nor did he rape anyone.

Vasuki is king of all naags takshak is king of sarps .


U kept on arguing Garuda having enimity with sheshnaag , & he tolerate sheshnaag coz of lord Vishnu when I told Garuda save sheshnaag u said it was compulsion, I mean really , I again proved why Garuda can't have enimity with sheshnaag & much to ur disappointment u can't argue further coz geeta don't have frictional versions .

My dear please tell me if Garuda and Sheshnaag were to fight, who is going to win? And if Sheshnaag and Lord Vishnu are one then why did Vishnu cut off one of his heads?

Next u kept on arguing unlimited hoods things yes Vasuki had unlimited hoods 4 sure but not more than sheshnaag coz sheshnaag has no end that's why he is called adi anant sheshnaag. Initial or I say very first name of sheshnaag is naagraj anant . I was expecting to hear adi anant is used for Vasuki too.

Vasuki does have unlimited hoods too, if they are unlimited now, how can they be more or less than Sheshnaag’s?? Vasuki holds no such title however that doesn’t make him less or Sheshnaag superior. If you say Sheshnaag is someone that is considered to be the alpha and omega that Vasuki represents the endless circle of life and death, kundalini shakti.


When u argue anything related mytho then definitely u have to give d reference where it is written .

What reference have you given me that you are asking others around for references? You are only giving references of your favorite verses and dismissing others.

It's better first u see urself then point fingers on other.

I would say you should practice what you preach yourself


Yes we can agree to disagree .


That i agree.

Fruitcustard_9 thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 5 years ago
#60


Acc 2 story lord Vishnu chopped off sheshnaag's one of d hood was that he found him eyeing goddess Lakshmi ( it's a frictional story ). Even Garuda is cursed by an sage so he cant enter Vrindavan & kaliya choose that place to stay.


I guess u feel geeta has different versions but sad to inform it's not my version it's very much say lord krishna himself , he is anant amoung all naags & Garuda amoung birds , arjun amoung Pandavas , aur bhi example diye the.


Regarding Vasuki resting on lord shiv's neck there r many stories related to it , I posted an video yesterday only which has 3 different stories with samundra manthan one , it's has other stories 2.


No Garuda is not assigned to protect amrit reason when swarglok went under control of raavan , amrit went under control of raavan & he hid it inside him. When d final battle b/w ram & raavan happen & raavan was not being killed by lord ram , that time vibhishan told lord ram to hit raavan's belly coz he had hidden amrit inside him & lord ram killed raavan by hitting on his belly button. This story is very much mentioned in ramayan versions.


There is no reference of fight b/w raavan & Garuda 4 amrit if Garuda was protector of amrit. After raavan died amrit again went to indra .


D main story of Garuda & naags only states Garuda returned amrit to indra & got boon . Garuda resides in vaikuntha not in swarg


What r u trying to say by Vasuki had guts to fight with Garuda , is he was doing some favour of naag clan by protecting them from garuda ? It was his duty to protect naag clan 4 Garuda which comes under king's duties not some kind of favour . I guess u r trying to say sheshnaag abonden his duties as a king .

Do u think sheshnaag don't have guts to fight Garuda ? As he dont have any reason , If Vasuki protected naag clan from garuda , so sheshnaag appointment a right & powerful king on his position before proceeding to vaikuntha who can protect them which Vasuki did .


What is does it mean by Vasuki selflessly helped lord shiv . Vasuki is not d only selfless serpent king , even sheshnaag is selfless who is serving lord Vishnu.


Mahakumbh is frictional serial not some real story which ur giving reference , regarding vignharta ganesh it showed many stories which is their creative freedom , siya ke ram showed raavan's wife mandodri she is a very pious lady , comes under 5 paanch kanya ) went to some demi god ( I forget d name ) who was guarding amrit & asked to help her to protect her husband , there is some long conversation & in end amrit itself went to mandodri & she placed it inside raavan (I mean what d hell they show ) now tell which serial to believe. When everyone is showing different stories.


now's day people play with storylines to suits there purpose. Not only vignharta ganesh , serial like starplus mahabharat , siya ke raam , ram siya ke luv kush ,suryaputra karn etc showed many stories which r Frictional & highly distorted. Not only mythological but historical serials r also being distorted to no end.


I never said sheshnaag is undefeated , it's u who pointed 4 Vasuki which is not true .


. No Vasuki can't be rapist which bheel mahabharat stated , I guess u missed that I wrote I considered bheel mahabharat frictional .


Regarding bela being naagrani acc to serial it's correct , I guess u forgot or choose to ignore it . Vish very clearly said naagrani will not leave naaglok & come to protect vrinda , then shesha pray that naagrani comes & prove vish wrong that time bela turn up. When naageshwari came she asked bela & shesha to return to naaglok & started telling her story .


It clearly tell bela is a ruling queen of naaglok & manayta , her mother is no more that's why they could not come to vrinda's rescue . So bela & shesha both r not dead ye serial main dekhaya gaya hai , maine apni taraf se nhi add kiya hai.


Even I find ur theory thinks half baked only.


There can never be fight b/w Vasuki & sheshnaag there r is immense love & respect b/w them .


U r really funny I must say🤣 vasuki can't step out of Kailash out of fear of Garuda as Garuda has nothing to do in life rather killing Vasuki . Garuda had never attacked Vasuki personally till date , when lord Vishnu ask then he went to attack naag clan .

U urself is painting Vasuki something which he was never as Vasuki is really powerful & brave not someone who need protection always .


Lord shiv giving protection to Vasuki doesn't mean Vasuki life is restricted to only kailash

, lord shiv can help or save him anywhere whenever he need his help .

Edited by deepikagupta9 - 5 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".