Na I’m not saying any of the points raised were necessarily and/or entirely right. But they were valid enough to be acknowledged at the very least. Not to mention - it defeats the purpose. On the one hand, you’re insulting the HMs (aside from a couple of them) that they’re thakele, don’t give content, don’t speak up - but when they do, they’re shut up and made to feel as though they’re stupid - because “pehle ke seasons nahi dekhke and yeh woh”.
The minute any of the seniors feel that there is even the minutest shade being thrown on them, lag jate hain into shutting up the HM in question. They had their reasons for choosing Tamboli - no worries, but what they should’ve said to Eijaz is that fair enough - that wasn’t the best side to her, but we felt that her task performance, etc. overshadowed that.
But to say ki that show of selfishness is what makes her a strong personality? LMAO - such hypocrites these lot I tell you, especially Shukla. Not to mention making Eijaz feel like he doesn’t know what he’s on about because usko game aata hi nahi. And they do that often. It’s gotta be hella demotivating.
I agree with you somehere.
Seniors are interfering too much and shouldn’t just side with one contestant, they should also side with others sometimes.
I feel like especially Shukla gets too personal when it comes to Nikki, itna tou he didn’t even go gaga over Shehnaz and defended her.
The way he was going crazy in the tasks when people were coming for Nikki, ufff!!
