Members Only - SSR Case Discussion Thread #5

First Previous

Page

117

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Soanz.19

@Soanz.19

Rocker

Posted: 5 years ago

#921

Originally posted by: zaroonkashaf
Has anyone seen the kind of filth Anurag has been spewing on Twitter? I definitely want to know what he is smoking. The dude is out there maligning Sushant and in the next sentence talking about respecting him and his family. He is pretty much stating that the industry is supporting Rhea because they have interacted with Sushant for years and "know him". Whatever the f that means. He is I think essentially saying Sushant was an "addict" already. Acha ji...chaliye maan bhi liya that was the case. How the f are you still justifying defending a girl whose chats pretty much state she was a regular user as was her brother and probably her father. These are her chats. Her words. Some of them date back to 2017. What you are doing is throwing a dead man under the bus in order to defend someone against whom evidence exists and is out there for everyone to see. I have lost whatever little respect I had for Anurag. It basically shows these people will go to any lengths to hide all the toxicity that exists in this industry. It says how hollow the industry is from within.

He's coming across as a vile person

Quote

anjs

@anjs

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 5 years ago

#922

Originally posted by: kar08
Hope so.
"Therefore it is clear from statement that respondent is an active member of drug syndication connected with drug supplies. It is also clear from the statement that the present respondent used to procure drugs for Sushant Singh Rajput for consumption purpose. The present respondent used to manage finance for drug procurement along with Sushant Singh Rajput."
To me this sounds as if is an accepted fact that he was consuming drugs.

@blue : this makes his family lawyer's case strong that she used to drug him......she cannot prove that he ordered it, as there is no record to prove that.......so as per my belief she is stuck by blaming him who is no more to prove himself innocent and Indian law is very humane, so i dont think it will blame a dead person without any proves......

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Zania

@zaniax

Inactive

Posted: 5 years ago

#923

Showik and Miranda’s custody extended to 14days😆

Quote

DirtyMartini

@Grumpydwarf24

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 5 years ago

#924

Again I didn’t see it. But I believe you guys.

https://www.instagram.com/dhamidrashti/?hl=en

Quote

KrishnaSourav

@KrishnaRukmini

Achiever

+ 10

Posted: 5 years ago

#925

Originally posted by: grumpydwarf
Again I didn’t see it. But I believe you guys.

https://www.instagram.com/dhamidrashti/?hl=en

neither I am able to see it but the article said it isliye to confusion ho raha hain

Quote

Asmi

@Ekaanek100

Sparkler

+ 6

Posted: 5 years ago

#926

Originally posted by: zaroonkashaf
Has anyone seen the kind of filth Anurag has been spewing on Twitter? I definitely want to know what he is smoking. The dude is out there maligning Sushant and in the next sentence talking about respecting him and his family. He is pretty much stating that the industry is supporting Rhea because they have interacted with Sushant for years and "know him". Whatever the f that means. He is I think essentially saying Sushant was an "addict" already. Acha ji...chaliye maan bhi liya that was the case. How the f are you still justifying defending a girl whose chats pretty much state she was a regular user as was her brother and probably her father. These are her chats. Her words. Some of them date back to 2017. What you are doing is throwing a dead man under the bus in order to defend someone against whom evidence exists and is out there for everyone to see. I have lost whatever little respect I had for Anurag. It basically shows these people will go to any lengths to hide all the toxicity that exists in this industry. It says how hollow the industry is from within.

Simple question to these pseudo liberals and pillars of Women Liberalization/Empowerment Movement..EVen if was a drug addict.. DOes it make sense that he was allowed with it after being diagnosed with deep depression and was availed with ease by the accused ..the accused who once in her interview mentioned she was trying to get him off his addiction..Is it morally okay to let him have it when he is having high doses of hard medicines..? And why would he need the accuse to procure drug ..or would force her to get it for him,...Considering he is an addict since ages and have been taking it for a while..WOuld he need the accused to get it for him.He would have better network right? They were the ones..who kept saying..now keep quite..move on..let the central agency investigate..This is a result of central agency investigation..Are not they now questioning the agency ..?

Edited by asmi_joya - 5 years ago