Uhm, that "horrible" film with Karishma is actually DTPH, so you lost me. Also, great that Kajol and Karishma, and Aish, and others were able to top HAHK and are still such superstars... Oh, wait, not really. 😃
Looking at Madhuri's post-HAHK filmography, I would certainly add Lajja, and the magical Dedh Ishqiya, and the underrated Aaja Nachle. I didn't like Wajood, but it certainly wasn't a horrible film, and neither were Koyla or Prem Granth. But hey, let's continue with the "horrible Madhuri films" narrative, let's shit on her unquestionable talent and versatility (and - of course - let's tie her fandom to Sridevi's career and let's babble about how Aish's 3 hours in Devdas "overshadowed" Madhuri's 45 minutes - that's actually kinda hilarious) instead of considering the most plausible answer: because BW and most of its crappy, unimaginative writers have had nothing interesting to offer to her? Because the said BW and most of its crappy, unimaginative writers still seem to think that 40-something or 50-something, or 60 etc. women are not proper humans and no one will be interested in their stories and emotions? And god forbid actresses dare to be married or to play shady, villainous characters, or to think of themselves as more than grandmas - I mean, only in India people still seem to have a problem with differentiating between an actor and a role. Maybe it's time the audiences grew up, too?
This.
Those saying Ash overshadowed Madhuri in devdas need a reality check
13