Originally posted by: Nikki_srk
Well, I went through the thread in the morning. So, tab wahan zyada comments nahi the...
Now, coming to people's enthusiasm about Ani's haq on Boni... Well, ye to kaafi common baat hai forums ki. Har jagah mostly yahi to dikhta hai... ML's haq on FL, his possessiveness for the FL etcetera...
Bold: I can understand... 🤗
See, at the end of the day, the HAQ or RIGHT - it's very natural. The problem is the borderline abuse that is mostly highlighted in a lot of shows. The clip I shared with you, it's another thing that Anjali was specifically planted to catch Badal and Suman. But at the beginning Suman didn't know it. The way she reacted, wouldn't we roast a ML if he did the same thing? Because ultimately your spouse would meet new people and interact with them. Ultimately, it's about how we keep our urges in control and behave. Because Pallavi did ask Suman - Anjali ko choro, kya tumhe Badal pe bharosa nahi hain?
Coming to my problem with this particular couple is that here we are dealing with a 8 years old kid and a young man who is in his early twenties. Yes, the story is set in 1920 and they are married. But the guy looks at her as a kid and is trying his best to support her. When you are teaching a kid, wouldn't you show authority? Because you are teaching him/her. So how is it suddenly getting translated in HAQ? Plus Ani as a person is short tempered and is a bit bratty in a sense that he feels ultimately everybody will listen and agree to his words. He did the same mistake with Mini too as he just expected Mini to share the same dream when she in fact had other plans.
10 years from now, Bondita will be a grown, educated woman and will have her voice. Ani will learn from his experience and let go off his kiddish behavior. At that point if they decide to stay together and fulfill their relation then I would understand the HAQ thing. But from which angle HAQ is being exercised now? At least I am failing to see it. 🤔
Sports
