~| Whatever you want to argue about |~ - Page 101

Originally posted by: NoraSM

Virat's alliance with Pandavas who had absolutely nothing, with Virat losing so much in the war, it was a bad deal, even now people won't marry their daughter to people who don't even have a home, so Krishna would have played bigger role in this alliance

@Bold I don't think Virat lost much in the war. With Pandavas at your service you don't have that option

It was however stupid of Duryodhan to attack Matasya desh after having suspected Pandavas there. Instead he should have sent a marriage proposal between Lakshman n Uttara to them. In fact taken it himself and tried to search for Pandavas within😆

Kya pata Matasya raj maan bhi jaate

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

@Bold I don't think Virat lost much in the war. With Pandavas at your service you don't have that option

It was however stupid of Duryodhan to attack Matasya desh after having suspected Pandavas there. Instead he should have sent a marriage proposal between Lakshman n Uttara to them. In fact taken it himself and tried to search for Pandavas within😆

Kya pata Matasya raj maan bhi jaate

I meant Virat losing so much in the great war, he actually had to participate and everyone knew it, his son died too. Alliance with Pandavas = Participating in War

So, There must have been something which made him side with Pandavas and be a part of this war, On Paper Kauravas were stronger with wealth and army and Pandavas had nothing. Just think about it, who would marry his daughter to Arjuna's son?

Originally posted by: NoraSM

I meant Virat losing so much in the great war, he actually had to participate and everyone knew it, his son died too. Alliance with Pandavas = Participating in War

So, There must have been something which made him side with Pandavas and be a part of this war, On Paper Kauravas were stronger with wealth and army and Pandavas had nothing. Just think about it, who would marry his daughter to Arjuna's son?

Arjuna already spent a year with her in women's quarters. I don't believe Virat had a choice. It was either Arjuna or his son, no one else could marry Uttara no matter how many times anyone protested nothing happened.

I don't believe karn at all , coz when it's come 2 draupadi , he is capable of talking any nonsense or shit .

Infact he open mouth only talk garbage.

Flying chapal coming on d way from karn's fans 4 me🤣🤣

I too would like to believe that abhi is called Krishna's son because he was raised by Krishna.

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

that could be the reason, but Abhimanyu was not Krishna's foster son unlike Krishna to Yashoda.

I guess I don't want to believe that Arjun had relations with a teenager immidiately after a supposed forced marriage that's why was looking for excuses.

You might be right though

It is said arjun spent one year in dwarka after marriage with subhadra. I guess not immediately but after sometime with Subhadra's consent.

Only sperm donation doesn't make anyone Father I mean Krishna took care of Abhimanyu almost from toddler to a mature teenager, trained him to be a warrior, so obviously by all means he has right to be called his father.

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

It is said arjun spent one year in dwarka after marriage with subhadra. I guess not immediately but after sometime with Subhadra's consent.

That is during the 12 years exile thing. That's not a possibility in 13 months exile thing and 12 years exile seem improbable to me.

And even if its a year, Subhadra still was below 16 and consent/no consent is something we could never know

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

I don't believe karn at all , coz when it's come 2 draupadi , he is capable of talking any nonsense or shit .

Infact he open mouth only talk garbage.

Flying chapal coming on d way from karn's fans 4 me🤣🤣

Capable to? This is the only wrong thing he ever said about Draupadi. Rest of the times he was impressed by her overall

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

That is during the 12 years exile thing. That's not a possibility in 13 months exile thing and 12 years exile seem improbable to me.

And even if its a year, Subhadra still was below 16 and consent/no consent is something we could never know

Consent in having sex is still not taken by boy's even today and I don't think so they used take consent then.