Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism
I have written the same in my last post about 4 Krishnas
Arjun is hardly referred to as Krishna so why is his son called Krishna's son? If they wanted to highlight relations between Abhimanyu n Krishnaji it could be Krishna's nephew, beloved, student why Krishna's son?
Why was Abhimanyu called the heir by Satyaki even in front of Pandavas and no one objected to it? Why not Prativindhya?
Why was Parikshit made the king and not Prativindhya's son?
The things are not as simple even here
I could make out of it , I read somewhere Yadavs were planning 2 win indraprastha in absence of Yudi & Pandavas , they would had wanted someone from Yadavs to be d acting heir thou prativindhya was crowned prince but as Yudi & draupadi were in exile , I don't think he was supposed to sit on throne .