I was never offered Befikre - Sushant - Page 5

Originally posted by: Eboza

There was buzz for a mediocre performance? I mean whatever. for you it was mediocre for the people who created the buzz it wasn’t. Something that is not ranveer fault if people talked about him.

It’s the audience at the end of the day who actually creates the buzz and unfortunately it was always the audiences fault that Sushant didn’t get the buzz. Look at kartik. It’s the audience who made him visible so that Karan and his Gang notice him.

Outsider or insider whatever you wanna call ranveer I don’t care. Hussled or not hussled is again different for anyone.

But saying he is part of Karan gang at that time because he was invited to KWK is far fetch 😆

You putting laughing emog's in a serious situation is kind of insensitive for whatever reason it may be. I am entitled to my own opinion. Anyways,Ranveer is an insider and this is not a speculation but everything is there on his wiki page and his childhood images on google. And please ,the buzz that you're talking about is also created by media and their PR machinery. Deepika and Ranveer's PR always overdoes everything. They have the support of media and production houses which is the corrupt system everyone's talking about.

Regarding sushant, audience loved him in Dhoni, kedarnath, Chhichore and kai po che. Just look at their collections and then decide. Movies like sonchiriya and byomkesh bakshi weren't publicised much and hence they had to bear the brunt. The fault also lies in the media and PR. Despite giving so many successes, the media and other people never acknowledged him . When Dhoni became a hit, its success was attributed to dhonj and not sushant, at the time of kedarnath, everything was about sara, and at the time chhichore ,again shraddha was given the credit. Even when we as an audience saw his films which became successful, he was never considered in the league of ranveer ,ranbir who had even more failures in the careers despite having an overactive PR machinery, a great buzz and favouritism from media and directors. That in itself shows Ranveer's mediocre performances.

And i m purely stating my opinion which i m entitled to like you are to yours but no one can deny that it was SLB who made him successful. All his roles as a 'normal guy' are mediocre(according to me) and same rinse and repeat. He can only do the hyperactive roles and the roles in grand movies which anyone would otherwise also see because of the grandeur of SLB's movies. Apart from SLB's movies and gully boy(which was also copied) , he is nothing but a mediocre who is not willing to take a risk because he very well knows that majority audience only likes him in those grand or loud roles(which suite his personality). He never tries anything out of his comfort zone and that's a fact. I'd prefer rajkummar, ayushman , manoj bajpayee and sushant over him anyday.

Originally posted by: Eboza

You do know that every movie takes a different amount of time to be made.

Sushant signed YRF at the end of 2012 when ranveer was already shooting SLB movie and would have startet even earlier when Kareena wouldn’t have left.

IF sushant couldn’t sign it then it was because of Kai Po Che which is UTV and I must say He had balls to say no to Bhansali who wanted to launch him with Ram Leela but he rather choose Kai Po Che.

Heads off to Bhansali wanting to launch a newcomer directed by him something only ranbir kapoor got.

Can’t say anything about other movies Sushant say no since 2013 when he was bound to YRF.

I've provided the link to that article only you care to look at it and that was in response to the link you mentioned. I can't state any more proofs. So i'll rather peacefully disagree with you .

Originally posted by: lifeiscool

You putting laughing emog's in a serious situation is kind of insensitive for whatever reason it may be. I am entitled to my own opinion. Anyways,Ranveer is an insider and this is not a speculation but everything is there on his wiki page and his childhood images on google. And please ,the buzz that you're talking about is also created by media and their PR machinery. Deepika and Ranveer's PR always overdoes everything. They have the support of media and production houses which is the corrupt system everyone's talking about.

Regarding sushant, audience loved him in Dhoni, kedarnath, Chhichore and kai po che. Just look at their collections and then decide. Movies like sonchiriya and byomkesh bakshi weren't publicised much and hence they had to bear the brunt. The fault also lies in the media and PR. Despite giving so many successes, the media and other people never acknowledged him . When Dhoni became a hit, its success was attributed to dhonj and not sushant, at the time of kedarnath, everything was about sara, and at the time chhichore ,again shraddha was given the credit. Even when we as an audience saw his films which became successful, he was never considered in the league of ranveer ,ranbir who had even more failures in the careers despite having an overactive PR machinery, a great buzz and favouritism from media and directors. That in itself shows Ranveer's mediocre performances.

And i m purely stating my opinion which i m entitled to like you are to yours but no one can deny that it was SLB who made him successful. All his roles as a 'normal guy' are mediocre(according to me) and same rinse and repeat. He can only do the hyperactive roles and the roles in grand movies which anyone would otherwise also see because of the grandeur of SLB's movies. Apart from SLB's movies and gully boy(which was also copied) , he is nothing but a mediocre who is not willing to take a risk because he very well knows that majority audience only likes him in those grand or loud roles(which suite his personality). He never tries anything out of his comfort zone and that's a fact. I'd prefer rajkummar, ayushman , manoj bajpayee and sushant over him anyday.

ranveer has done a wide range of roles, from the loud and boisterous ram and khilji to the quiet varun from lootera and murad from gullyboy. You may think ranveer is mediocre but many others do not feel that way, Ranveer puts his 100% into every role he does. He has earned his position in the industry.

And before ramleela slb had a disaster with saawariya and guzaarish also didn't do well. People were starting to lose faith in slb as a director, but with ranveer and deepika in ramleela that changed for him, slb's film entered the 100 cr club and each film with ranveer and deepika has been bigger and bigger, so alot of the credit goes to ranveer and deepika aswell for those films

Originally posted by: zara321

ranveer has done a wide range of roles, from the loud and boisterous ram and khilji to the quiet varun from lootera and murad from gullyboy. You may think ranveer is mediocre but many others do not feel that way, Ranveer puts his 100% into every role he does. He has earned his position in the industry.

And before ramleela slb had a disaster with saawariya and guzaarish also didn't do well. People were starting to lose faith in slb as a director, but with ranveer and deepika in ramleela that changed for him, slb's film entered the 100 cr club and each film with ranveer and deepika has been bigger and bigger, so alot of the credit goes to ranveer and deepika aswell for those films

And what about normal roles like in ladies vs ricky bahl ,bombay talkies ,kill dill and befikre. Did they work despite of huge publicity? According to me, SLB's grand set, cinematography and direction were one of the main steering force. His direction was nothing short of magnificent and kind of similar to devdas and hum dil de chuke. I haven't seen sawariya and guzaarish so won't comment on that. I knew they were duds but never heard his repo being down bcoz of that.

Originally posted by: lifeiscool

https://www.huffingtonpost.in/entry/sushant-singh-rajput-interview_in_5d8ef27ae4b0ac3cdda8ffbb

Read this article carefully nd then decide.

His roles were given to the blue eyed boy of yrf i.e ranveer.

Wow, what a good interview. I wish it wasn't in print. I would have loved to watch his reactions to the interviewer's questions. Interesting..

Originally posted by: lifeiscool

You putting laughing emog's in a serious situation is kind of insensitive for whatever reason it may be. I am entitled to my own opinion. Anyways,Ranveer is an insider and this is not a speculation but everything is there on his wiki page and his childhood images on google. And please ,the buzz that you're talking about is also created by media and their PR machinery. Deepika and Ranveer's PR always overdoes everything. They have the support of media and production houses which is the corrupt system everyone's talking about.

Regarding sushant, audience loved him in Dhoni, kedarnath, Chhichore and kai po che. Just look at their collections and then decide. Movies like sonchiriya and byomkesh bakshi weren't publicised much and hence they had to bear the brunt. The fault also lies in the media and PR. Despite giving so many successes, the media and other people never acknowledged him . When Dhoni became a hit, its success was attributed to dhonj and not sushant, at the time of kedarnath, everything was about sara, and at the time chhichore ,again shraddha was given the credit. Even when we as an audience saw his films which became successful, he was never considered in the league of ranveer ,ranbir who had even more failures in the careers despite having an overactive PR machinery, a great buzz and favouritism from media and directors. That in itself shows Ranveer's mediocre performances.

And i m purely stating my opinion which i m entitled to like you are to yours but no one can deny that it was SLB who made him successful. All his roles as a 'normal guy' are mediocre(according to me) and same rinse and repeat. He can only do the hyperactive roles and the roles in grand movies which anyone would otherwise also see because of the grandeur of SLB's movies. Apart from SLB's movies and gully boy(which was also copied) , he is nothing but a mediocre who is not willing to take a risk because he very well knows that majority audience only likes him in those grand or loud roles(which suite his personality). He never tries anything out of his comfort zone and that's a fact. I'd prefer rajkummar, ayushman , manoj bajpayee and sushant over him anyday.

A laughing emoji is not insensitive when my sentence doesn’t include even Sushant and it’s all about your assumptions about who belongs to a Karan Joahr gang because of whom he invites to KWK is. as you Said it’s not a measurement of success but you made it seems like.

The rest what you write I dont care at this point.
mediocre or SLB made him a star or PR of this and that. I said it again. The audience plays a big role.

I answered you because you came up with an article or a comparison and I only gave a simple articles and Timeline that the article you Posted isn’t correct cause it doesn’t fit to the timeline of articles back then. These articles aren’t random and it’s from that time. But whatever floats your boat.

Since you take it now to somewhere else. That’s your opinion and whom you prefer.

Originally posted by: ffkhan

Words. Those who are bashing SRK and Shahid back and forth haven't even watched the full show and started judging out of the blue. There you go the link from the same show where both Shahid and SRK cheered when Sushant-Parineeti danced together when they called them over on the stage.

https://twitter.com/shanatic_nimra1/status/1273675572489699331

This happened a long time back...and even people who watched it might not remember it....The problem is that the losers who are posting a part of the video to get SRK bashed.....and its doing rounds on WA and FB....no one posted that SRK called Sushant, Ayushman and Parineeti the future of BW.....this kind of troll trashing is sickening...🤢

Thanks for posting this.

https://indianexpress.com/article/india/sushant-singh-rajputwas-upset-over-contract-with-production-house-actor-friend-to-police-6467356/

For those who had a doubt if yash raj didn't allow sushant to do ram leela. Kindly read this article. Those are rhea's wordings not mine.