Originally posted by: HearMeRoar
My thought: I gave enough citations, including from Krishna's mouth and from Arjuna's own, that Shikhandi killed Bheeshma. Not merely helped or aided Arjuna, but killed.
That being said, I don't believe it happened in a vacuum. Shikhandi couldn't defeat Bheeshma on his own as seen on Day 7. Part of the reason is that Bheeshma did have a huge number of guards surrounding him as was appropriate for the commander-in-chief. Part of the reason COULD BE that the old chap was simply better than Shikhandi. Which was probably why Krishna was constantly urging Arjuna to kill even though the oath belonged to Shikhandi. Arjuna COULD kill Bheeshma but wasn't willing.
When the Pandavas, Upapandavas, Abhimanyu (I believe he was also there), and Shikhandi did a combined attack, death became inevitable for Bheeshma. This is where Bheeshma deciding to stop fighting Arjuna becomes important. His bigotry is well-documented in his own words in Anushasana Parva. He definitely did not want to die to a man he considered a woman. Knowing he was going to die, Bheeshma preferred to die at Arjuna's hands instead of Shikhandi's. Bheeshma's own words about Arjuna's arrows piercing his vitals are proof. Arjuna didn't use any of the special astras. Otherwise, arrows are arrows. Similar to bullets, unless one were to dig them out and examine, it wouldn't be possible to tell the difference for the one dying. Also, if he stayed alive for so long after war, he certainly wasn't struck in ANY vitals. He bled to death over days. He preferred to do so instead it being bandied about a gay man brought him down.
But post war narrative in many citations that you posted comes into play too, if It was Bhishma's wish not to be killed by Shikhandi and Everyone obliged, they won't mention it
If Bhishma wanted Arjuna to kill him and Arjuna did it then there's no confusion
Shikhandi was added to show Bhishma as invincible, His disdain towards LGBT community and preferring death over killing them makes him a hero for THAT time and now too, the narrative is that Bhishma was killed because he didn't want to fight a woman, this particular aspect is celebrated by the masses not criticized
Arjun used celestial weapon on Bhishma, It is mentioned by Sanjaya, in one of the citations I have provided
Pandava army was engaged with Kuru army, They couldn't put all their efforts on Bhishma as they had to stop the whole Kaurava army. Shikhandi is mentioned either in front of Arjuna or shooting arrows on Bhishma
"Besides these, all the Kshatriyas of the Pandava army who followed Dhananjaya, as soon as they approached Bhishma, had to go to Yama's abode. Covering the Pandava host from every side with showers of arrows"
No mention of Shikhandi here
Beholding him thus put forth his prowess, the slayer of Madhu, viz., the son of Devaki, cheerfully addressing Dhananjaya, said, 'There, Bhishma, the son of Santanu, stayeth between the two armies. Slaying him by putting forth thy might, thou mayst win victory. There, at that spot, whence he breaketh our ranks, check him, putting forth thy strength. O lord, none else, save thee, ventureth to bear the arrows of Bhishma.
Again, Krishna is talking to Arjun only, he is not talking about a plan to put Shikhandi before them
Then the king of the Panchalas the valiant Dhrishtaketu, Bhimasena the son of Pandu, Dhrishtadyumna of Prishata's race, the twins (Nakula and Sahadeva), Chekitana, and the five Kaikaya brothers, and the mighty-armed Satyaki and Subhadra's son, and Ghatotkacha, and the (five) sons of Draupadi, and Sikhandin, and the valiant Kuntibhoja, and Susarman, and Virata, these and many other powerful warriors of the Pandava army, afflicted by the shafts of Bhishma, seemed to sink in an ocean of grief, Phalguni, however, rescued them all
This is where I read Bhishma attacking Shikhandi on day 10
Then Sikhandin, taking up a mighty weapon and protected by Kiritin, rushed impetuously towards Bhishma alone. The unvanquished Vibhatsu then, knowing what should be done after what, slew all those that followed Bhishma, and then himself rushed at him. And Satyaki, and Chekitana, and Dhristadyumna of Prishata's race, and Virata, and Drupada, and the twin sons of Madri by Pandu, all protected by that firm bowman (viz., Arjuna) rushed against Bhishma alone in that battle. And Abhimanyu, and the five sons of Draupadi also,with mighty weapons upraised, rushed against Bhishma in battle. All those firm bowmen, unretreating from battle, pierced Bhishma in diverse parts of his body with well-aimed shafts. Disregarding all those shafts, large in number, shot by those foremost of princes belonging to the Pandava host, Bhishma of undepressed soul penetrated into the Pandava ranks.
After being attacked by so many people, He goes inside and kills so many people 🤦♀️ its just seems like exaggeration to me, and this is where the whole issue of Shikhandi being feminine comes when he attacked her in above paragraph, he is not feminine, let me quote -
Frequently looking at Sikhandin the prince of the Panchalas with a laugh, he aimed not a single arrow at him, recollecting his femininity. On the other hand, he slew seven great car-warriors belonging to Drupada's division
@bold - If everyone attacked Bhishma together then they outrank him, which is unethical like death of Abhimanyu
Also there's no mention of Dusashan who was protecting Bhishma
When Bhishma decided to stop fighting Arjuna, Pandavas-Upapandavas-Abhimanyu-Satyaki-Dhristadumya are specifically mentioned battling Kauravas who went to attack Arjuna, citation is in the main post
If everyone was attacking him together, he wouldn't have died at Shikhandi's hand, he would have achieved death like Abhimanyu by deciet and unethical means
_____________________________________
Shikhandi is mentioned doing two things and both things have different narratives -
1 Shooting arrows
2 Arjun putting him before himself
____________________________________
Shooting arrows is important for Shikhandi's oath -
Now my original point was that Pandavas take oath very seriously, Shikhandi is mentioned shooting arrows at Bhishma but he couldn't overpower Bhishma that's where Arjun comes in and incapacitates Bhishma who dies because of arrows
Now whose arrows can't be decided, Shikhandi's oath was more important so everyone accepted that Shikhandi's arrows killed Bhishma
Shikhandi killing Bhishma wouldn't have been mentioned if they didn't want Bhishma to die at hands of someone from LGBT community, they respected Bhishma and would have respected his wish too
______________________________
Arjun putting Shikhandi before him -
This is Amba reincarnation theory where Bhishma couldn't attack Shikhandi and Arjuna kills Bhishma by putting Shikhandi ahead of him and he becomes the "Cause" of Bhishma's death
This narrative was given by Bhishma himself, citing feminity of Shikhandi time and again, this makes him a warrior who could be defeated only because he followed his principles
____________________________________
Shikhandi is not mentioned when Bhishma surrenders, It is Arjuna leading Pandavas when Bhishma fell down from his chariot
If I remove Shikhandi from the picture, nothing changes apart from the narrative that Bhishma died only because he couldn't go against his principles
______________________
My opinion in this is that I don't believe in Amba theory, so the only reason Sanjaya says that Bhishma fell from Arjun's arrows and Dhritrashtra says that he was slain by Shikhandi is because they can't tell whose arrows killed him, and Shikhandi had an oath to uphold so everyone agreed that it was Shikhandi's arrows which killed him
Amba theory was a later interpolation to give divinity to Bhishma