Originally posted by: Rosie_Marco
I don't see any difference.They do massy films.
Tiger Shroff is a genuine action hero 😎 Salman Khan isn't 😆.
Originally posted by: Rosie_Marco
I don't see any difference.They do massy films.
Tiger Shroff is a genuine action hero 😎 Salman Khan isn't 😆.
Tiger is better looking, better body, taller, can do better action, better dancer and a nicer person.
The acting ability of both of them is atrocious
I’d say he’s a fair replacement :) definitely an upgrade from uncle
Nope. Tiger has action and dance ability, but doesn't have the comedic timing that salman has. Both cannot act much, but if you have to compare then salman is way ahead of tiger in acting department.
Salman's star will fade away apne aap. Not because a new guy threatened it
https://www.indiaforums.com/article/salman-khan-gets-fresh-threat-rs-5-crore-ransom-demand-from-alleged-bishnoi-gang-member_231749
https://x.com/i/status/2021757258938646725
https://www.indiaforums.com/article/dangals-untouchable-record-under-threat-dhurandhar-2-and-varanasi-could-rewrite-box-office-history_231682
https://x.com/i/status/2047219777505206386
https://x.com/i/status/2056970961396904018
6