Tiger Shroff is a threat to Salman?

Frequent Posters

mintyblue

@mintyblue

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 5 years ago

#11

Salman aced the romantic genre before starting out in action films. He was also good in comedy.

Whereas Tiger is more like Sunny Deol in terms of appeal and following among male junta only.

Quote

AllThatCritique

@AllThatCritique

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 5 years ago

#12

Originally posted by: Rosie_Marco
Who is Launde Lapade?

Oh.. well. Bhai's fanclub name 🤠

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Anika80

@Anika80

Voyager

Posted: 5 years ago

#13

Tiger is more like sunny deol.. Salman can be decent or even good in comic role and when he was younger as romantic hero

Quote

Jaitreya23

@Jaitreya23

Rocker

Posted: 5 years ago

#14

No, never.

Salman Khan is good looking, has effective screen presence and he can act somewhat. He developed a bond with boys as rough tough guy and his unique style worked too. To girls his good looks appealed a lot. He has massive fan following and large number is still loyal to him. This is despite the court cases and other controversies he stoked up.

Tiger is not good looking, wooden, poor screen presence won't last long. Tiger cannot survive multiple flops forget the controversies.

Quote

Navaat Kaay Thevle Ahey ?

@BhetuPunha

Dazzler

Posted: 5 years ago

#15

Tiger Shroff's audience is quite different than that of Salman Khan

Quote

Tyagisaab

@Tyagisaab

Explorer

Posted: 5 years ago

#16

Despite what people say about Sallu he could somewhat act. Tiger is literally wooden like any of us can probably emote better than him. Also Salman had a very natural screen presence which many of his contemporaries lack and was actually a decent comedic actor

Tiger is simply just a fad who will be on the way out once a new guy comes in.....

You have to have some decent acting ability to remain in Bollywood