Who do you think is main villian of Mahabharat - Page 13

Dronacharya is so coward in today's episode the way they all attacked Abhimanyu breaking war rules .... I dnt mind Pandavas breaking rule either after this but expected better from Dronacharya

Main villain offcourse Dhritrastra, Sakuni, duryadhan

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Vyas muni ki lineage to khatam ho gayi

We are from Yadav clan/ Indradev

Yadav clan to got over soon coz of curse by gandhari

Originally posted by: kurkure26

Yadav clan to got over soon coz of curse by gandhari

I meant Parikshit.

Originally posted by: kantalaga_

Dronacharya is so coward in today's episode the way they all attacked Abhimanyu breaking war rules .... I dnt mind Pandavas breaking rule either after this but expected better from Dronacharya

Main villain offcourse Dhritrastra, Sakuni, duryadhan

You might want to comment this on the episode discussion thread. Not here :)

Originally posted by: kantalaga_

Dronacharya is so coward in today's episode the way they all attacked Abhimanyu breaking war rules .... I dnt mind Pandavas breaking rule either after this but expected better from Dronacharya

Main villain offcourse Dhritrastra, Sakuni, duryadhan

The first war rule was first broken by the Pandavas. Striking on Bheeshm while being covered by Shikhandi and then attacking was no Dharma or within rules

Abhimanyu was a Maharathi. We have already discussed in another thread that a Maharathi fights a Maharathi if not then 12 Rathis or 6 DwiRathi as it might go. The people there were all junior designates. It was a ratio of 12:19 or something like that

Aside Chakravyu is supposed to be an all sided attack. A person who enters it has to be prepared for that. That's the reason it's considered dangerous and not everyone could break it. Their actions could have been considered wrong if they had such killing outside the Chakravyu

Abhimanyu Vadh is tragic but is shown as filled with treachery because that sells

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

The first war rule was first broken by the Pandavas. Striking on Bheeshm while being covered by Shikhandi and then attacking was no Dharma or within rules

Abhimanyu was a Maharathi. We have already discussed in another thread that a Maharathi fights a Maharathi if not then 12 Rathis or 6 DwiRathi as it might go. The people there were all junior designates. It was a ratio of 12:19 or something like that

Aside Chakravyu is supposed to be an all sided attack. A person who enters it has to be prepared for that. That's the reason it's considered dangerous and not everyone could break it. Their actions could have been considered wrong if they had such killing outside the Chakravyu

Abhimanyu Vadh is tragic but is shown as filled with treachery because that sells

mujhe aaj ka epi thoda overexaggrated laga

bhishma ka vadh makers justified by saying bhishm told him way but that was against rules

so pandavas broke it first

But i don't mind it coz in life and death situation type war everything is fair

abhimanyu first defeated everyone then also had one on one mace fight with dushahshan son

end mai jo huya abhimanyu ke saath was tragic and all when all of them attacked him but epi mai use thoda jyda exaggrate kia

brc dekhke lagta hai abhimanyu was krishna leela to make pandavas more agressive in the war

Pitamah Bhishma only told them use a women infront of me .... When Arjun said no ... Bhishma told him use as "Dhal" coz in war everyone protect themselves ....he got "ichhamitru" bardan ... How they broke any rules ?

Dronacharya definitely broke rules coz 7 ppl attacked Abhimanyu ..

Originally posted by: kantalaga_

Pitamah Bhishma only told them use a women infront of me .... When Arjun said no ... Bhishma told him use as "Dhal" coz in war everyone protect themselves ....he got "ichhamitru" bardan ... How they broke any rules ?

Dronacharya definitely broke rules coz 7 ppl attacked Abhimanyu ..

coz bhishm gave up his weapons seeing shikandi

and it was rule ki you can't attack anyone who is weaponless

bhishm justified it coz he knows hastinapur ka bhala kisme hai but rules were broken for sure

Originally posted by: kurkure26

coz bhishm gave up his weapons seeing shikandi

and it was rule ki you can't attack anyone who is weaponless

bhishm justified it coz he knows hastinapur ka bhala kisme hai but rules were broken for sure

No Bheeshma didn't give up weapons. It's a myth propagated by modern shows.

He continued shooting at both Arjuna and Shikhandi until the moment he fell.

I agree with kanta of course duryodhana shakuni dusassan karn all are villain

And bhishm clear told that no group of people will attack one person that too unarmed

And in chakra vyuh also there is rule one warrior will fight one warrior at a time

And coming to bhishm I totally agree with u on this

. Pandav did not break any rule . It is bhishm already gave pandav permission that pandav can bring a woman in front of me in war

All pandav did not attack together bhishm