Were all the Warriors in Kurukshetra related?

sambhavami thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#1

Most of the main warriors were part of the family in one way of the other.


Were the other warriors, the allies, also related to each other?


I mean, most of the Indian royal houses were interlinked anyway at that time! 😆


I like to believe that every warrior up in that field was fighting at least one family member, does that have some gravity? 🤔

Created

Last reply

Replies

3

Views

322

Users

3

Likes

5

Frequent Posters

FlauntPessimism thumbnail
Screen Detective Participant Thumbnail ICC T20 CWC 2024 Match Winner Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 5 years ago
#2

I don't think Pandayas were related to anyone.


There is a mention of someone from the kingdom of far west who were two sets of cousins. One set of cousins 5 brothers joined Kauravas and the other set of 100 brothers joined Pandavas.

731627 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#3

It is said that Mahabharata में अपने के beech लड़ाइ हुई so I think लड़ाइ में सभी relatives थे

sambhavami thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

I don't think Pandayas were related to anyone.


There is a mention of someone from the kingdom of far west who were two sets of cousins. One set of cousins 5 brothers joined Kauravas and the other set of 100 brothers joined Pandavas.


Twins, triplets, 5 vs 100s - was this some kind of a trend back then or what? 🤣

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".