I miss the old SRK and the good old times! - Page 7

Originally posted by: blue-ice.1

God Ji and VJ are back and how....🤣🤗😆

Originally posted by: slumgod..

That's because he was alredy familiar and used to with the gun. Remember black buc case.

Originally posted by: slumgod..

You have the point.If Sallu was a bigger star why he would he let director to create the scene where SRK slapped him. Thing to ponder.

We can watch that glorious scene again. Slap comes at 57secs

[YOUTUBE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-GVe55UgzE[/YOUTUBE]

another piece from KOIMOI

https://www.koimoi.com/bollywood-news/salman-khan-3-popular-myths-pertaining-to-the-superstar/

Salman Khan hit a rough patch between 2000-2009 and his stardom dipped:

Ludicrous reasons are wheeled out by his critics to perpetuate this myth. The movies in which he made guest appearances are tagged as his movies. HELLO, SAAWARIYA, HEROES, BAABUL, SAAWAN, etc. are some of the examples. By the same logic, does one count DULHA MIL GAYA, HEY RAM, BHOOTNATH, SILSILAY, KRAZZY 4, etc. as Shah Rukh’s movies?

It is amusing that naysayers discount superhits like MUJHSE SHAADI KAROGI, NO ENTRY, and PARTNER – all of which released between 2000 and 2009 – as these are multi-starrer movies. While the contribution to each and every member associated with the movie must be acknowledged, it is clear as daylight that Salman was the dominant star in those movies who pulled in the audience. The producer of NO ENTRY is still waiting for Salman’s approval and dates to start its sequel. The project has not taken off only because Salman is yet to allot the dates. While Anil Kapoor is a fine actor, he has been playing side-roles since 1999 and is dependent on the dominant star to pull through the movies. Same goes for Govinda whose heyday as superstar ended in 1999. Govinda has said in numerous interviews that he would always be grateful to Salman for offering him a film when no work was coming his way. If one look at Govinda’s movies from 2003 onwards, all of them have opened extremely poorly except PARTNER and BHAGAM BHAG. He no longer gets the lead roles.

Also, if we deploy the same rationale and yardstick, should we discount KABHI KHUSHI KABHI GHAM, DEVDAS, KAL HO NA HO, OM SHANTI OM, etc, from SRK’s oeuvre… and RANG DE BASANTI, 3 IDIOTS, DIL CHAHTA HAI, etc. from Aamir Khan’s body… or PHIR HER PHERI, WELCOME, HEY BABY, SINGH IS KINNG, BHOOL BHULAIYA, etc. from Akshay Kumar’s filmography?

People condone TERE NAAM, MAINE PYAAR KYUN KIYA, CHORI CHORI CHUPKE, WANTED, DULHAN HUM LE JAYENGE, and HAR DIL JO PYAR KAREGA as if they didn’t exist. These all movies were declared either hits or semi-hits by all trade experts alike, but when it comes to Salman anything less than a blockbuster is a flop?

Just for the reference of readers, GARAM MASALA, WAQT, NAMASTEY LONDON, DIL CHAHTA HAI, CHALTE CHALTE, KAL HO NA HO, DEVDAS, ANDAZ, etc. are all either hits or semi-hits. But are they called flops or disasters? The larger point here is that it is not appropriate to dub successful films (hits or semi-hits) as flops just because they were not blockbusters.

Another notable point is that even the films like GARV and LUCKY which were ultimately declared below-average at the box-office opened to packed houses.

Having said all this, one must admit that Salman was not as successful between 2000 and 2009 as he was in 1990s, a decade when he was undisputed numero uno. From 2000 to 2009, Shah Rukh and Aamir certainly had an edge over Salman, but to say that Salman’s stardom had dipped considerably is a gross exaggeration. The perception and general consensus about Salman among hoi polloi has always been that of a larger-than-life superstar.

Originally posted by: MunnaBadnamHua

another piece from KOIMOI

https://www.koimoi.com/bollywood-news/salman-khan-3-popular-myths-pertaining-to-the-superstar/

Salman Khan hit a rough patch between 2000-2009 and his stardom dipped:

I think it had to do with his arrests

Cause his box office of 2000-2009 was still enough to put him in top 5

Originally posted by: MunnaBadnamHua

for those who think salman was nothing in 90s n srk rules LMAO

Most successful Bollywood actors 1990 – 19994 years ago

by Indicine Team

2 min read

We finally have the analysis of the most successful actors between 1990 – 1999. It’s a decade that marked the rise of the three Khans, while Ajay Devgn and Akshay Kumar were growing their fanbase and delivering quite a few hits in between.

Salman Khan leads in every category – highest net collections, success ratio, hit ratio and the best average per film. He also has the highest grosser and the most watched film of the 90s in Sooraj Barjatya’s Hum Aapke Hain Kaun.

Salman and Shah Rukh are the only two actors to average more than 10 crore plus per film.

Most number of films:

• Akshay Kumar – 42 films
• Ajay Devgn – 33 films
• Salman Khan – 29 films
• Shah Rukh Khan – 28 films
• Aamir Khan – 23 films

Total Net Collections for each actor between 1990 – 1999:

• Salman Khan – 375 crore
• Shah Rukh Khan – 327 crore
• Ajay Devgn – 221 crore
• Akshay Kumar – 196 crore
• Aamir Khan – 186 crore

Average net box office collections per film between 1990 – 1999

• Salman Khan – 12.9 crore
• Shah Rukh Khan – 11.7 crore
• Aamir Khan – 8.1 crore
• Ajay Devgn – 6.7 crore
• Akshay Kumar – 4.7 crore

hit ratio sallu 45%

srk 32 %🤣

So what you're telling me is that Salman was number one, and yet everyone called SRK King Khan? 😆

These numbers are rubbish, I'd like to see the source for these numbers, they will never show you the source, because these numbers are made up.

Originally posted by: Heisenberg17_

So what you're telling me is that Salman was number one, and yet everyone called SRK King Khan? 😆

These numbers are rubbish, I'd like to see the source for these numbers, they will never show you the source, because these numbers are made up.

link

https://www.indicine.com/movies/bollywood/145301/

posted an article from koimoi too

ab wo bhi ghalat aur rubbish huga

anyways 😆

king came in 2000 as far as i know :) cheers

Originally posted by: Heisenberg17_

So what you're telling me is that Salman was number one, and yet everyone called SRK King Khan? 😆

I think that was self given

Originally posted by: MunnaBadnamHua

source indicine

link

https://www.indicine.com/movies/bollywood/145301/

posted an article from koimoi too

ab wo bhi ghalat aur rubbish huga

anyways 😆

king came in 2000 as far as i know :) cheers

That's just an article, there's no database for any of this, we are talking about the 90s India, how accurate and credible are these figures, and where did they get them from.

I can only talk from lived experience, as I'm an 80s kid, and was old enough to remember the craze in the 90s, SRK stardom was unparalleled.

Originally posted by: Heisenberg17_

So what you're telling me is that Salman was number one, and yet everyone called SRK King Khan? 😆

These numbers are rubbish, I'd like to see the source for these numbers, they will never show you the source, because these numbers are made up.

The first time was fine but the way. you have been going on and on about it like this was some honorary title conferred upon him....Fans ka and media ka diya hua hai bhai...what do you mean everyone?