some mistakes....

hi HP fans....i hv some mistakes which the books have.....

BOOK 6-

Slughorn says, "One tiny bottle of Felix Felicis enough for twelve hours' luck. From dusk til' dawn, you will be lucky in everything you attempt."

But then on page 476, Harry says, "I don't reckon I'll need all of it, not twenty-four hours' worth..😉

BOOK 7-

The Elder Wand was supposed to be unbeatable, but Dumbledore defeats Grindlewald to win it. [isent dat wierd?]

BOOK 1-

Harry's letter from Hogwarts says he may bring a cat, an owl, or a toad, but Ron brings his rat, Scabbers.😉

wat do u guys think abt it?? does any1 hv an explanation 4 these howlers??

Originally posted by: vrits

hi HP fans....i hv some mistakes which the books have.....

BOOK 6-

Slughorn says, "One tiny bottle of Felix Felicis enough for twelve hours' luck. From dusk til' dawn, you will be lucky in everything you attempt."

But then on page 476, Harry says, "I don't reckon I'll need all of it, not twenty-four hours' worth..😉how do u knw how he was given in d bottle???slughorn meant dat a tiny amnt wil b enuf...deres no hard n fst rule dat it wil hav 2 b a tiny bottle u no

BOOK 7-

The Elder Wand was supposed to be unbeatable, but Dumbledore defeats Grindlewald to win it. [isent dat wierd?]dats y hez DD n hez grindy😉

BOOK 1-

Harry's letter from Hogwarts says he may bring a cat, an owl, or a toad, but Ron brings his rat, Scabbers.😉hmm really..i havent noticed...but dne der r allowd cuz sacabbers blngd 2 percy once wen he was in hogs too

wat do u guys think abt it?? does any1 hv an explanation 4 these howlers??i dont get this?

Originally posted by: tukz_REmix

mine in red

i dont think the last 2 were convincing enough😊

Originally posted by: chhilt

i don't think there's any explanation for this... i wondered about scabbers too... 😆 😆 😆

thnx 4 agreeing with me!😊

Originally posted by: vrits

hi HP fans....i hv some mistakes which the books have.....

BOOK 6-

Slughorn says, "One tiny bottle of Felix Felicis enough for twelve hours' luck. From dusk til' dawn, you will be lucky in everything you attempt."

But then on page 476, Harry says, "I don't reckon I'll need all of it, not twenty-four hours' worth..😉

oh well...I guess Jo accidentally double 12...forget it yaar...maaf kar do...She is human..It happens!

BOOK 7-

The Elder Wand was supposed to be unbeatable, but Dumbledore defeats Grindlewald to win it. [isent dat wierd?]

No, The explanation for that has been discussed, re discussed, re discusses again and again in this forum isnt it guys?!😉 U came a bit late for that Vrits!😉

But I will give u hint on that...try to find the answer urself (dont worry, its there clearly in the books...) precisely in the chapter "King's Cross". Read it again..there is one dialogue of Dumbledore when he talks abt Voldemort chasing the Elder Wand that makes the answer for that clear...

BOOK 1-

Harry's letter from Hogwarts says he may bring a cat, an owl, or a toad, but Ron brings his rat, Scabbers.😉

Hm...well I guess they just meant dont bring a chimpanzee or Monkey as a pet...Bring sumthing useful like an Owl or sumthign small and cute like a Toad..n Rat isnt much bigger (though neither are that cute!)😉

wat do u guys think abt it?? does any1 hv an explanation 4 these howlers??

Originally posted by: lucky_lakshmi

maaf kar do??? of course maaf kiya!!! J.K is the best author ever....its not like am in a personal grudge with her....no ways.... its just dat i spotted them while reading! there is no mistake commited by her and so there is no question of maafi😆

Originally posted by: lucky_lakshmi

Originally posted by: vrits

hi HP fans....i hv some mistakes which the books have.....

BOOK 6-

Slughorn says, "One tiny bottle of Felix Felicis enough for twelve hours' luck. From dusk til' dawn, you will be lucky in everything you attempt."

Well as well as I remember, the buk sys one spoonful for 12 hours and a bottle for 24...fair enough!

Maybe m wrong...bt this is what I remember[/red]

But then on page 476, Harry says, "I don't reckon I'll need all of it, not twenty-four hours' worth..😉

BOOK 7-

The Elder Wand was supposed to be unbeatable, but Dumbledore defeats Grindlewald to win it. [isent dat wierd?]

Grindelwald didnt rightly own the wand..it was Gregorvitch's and Gillet jus stole it. So it wasnt rightly his so he can be defeated.

BOOK 1-

Harry's letter from Hogwarts says he may bring a cat, an owl, or a toad, but Ron brings his rat, Scabbers.😉

The main purpose for the animals was to transfuge them..as far as I can see and one could use scabbers for it.

Well maybe Percy asked permission wen he got into Hogs...so Ron was allowed too[/red]

wat do u guys think abt it?? does any1 hv an explanation 4 these howlers??

Originally posted by: luna_lovegood

Oh No I dont think so...see if Grindelwald wasnt the rightful owner of the Elder Wand, then Dumbledore wouldnt have become the rightful owner of the Elder Wand Either bcoz HE hasnt beat the real owner...
Grindelwald was the true owner bcoz he defeated Gregorovitch...He stunned the wand Maker thereby stopping him...that is he stopped Gregorovitch from stopping him thereby having the upper hand and beating him and he became the true owner of the Elder Wand..
I believe the answer for this lies in the misconception about the 'unbeatability' of the Elder Wand. If one reads Kings Cross carefully, that the Elder Wand is not unconquerable is a blind belief is evident...