Is Ranbir still a bigger star than Ranveer? - Page 2

I’d say it’s a tie 😎

No. Ranbir’s flops alone would have ended any A list actor’s career. He is just lucky to be born Kapoor. You cannot justify the string of disastrous movies he’s delivered. Sanju’s success was a combination of various factors; I highly doubt the audience went to watch Ranbir Kapoor.

Originally posted by: Sorein

No. Ranbir’s flops alone would have ended any A list actor’s career. He is just lucky to be born Kapoor. You cannot justify the string of disastrous movies he’s delivered. Sanju’s success was a combination of various factors; I highly doubt the audience went to watch Ranbir Kapoor.

Sanju's success was a combination of various factors but the flops he delivered were solely because of him?

Nope

Ranveer surpassed his popularity 3 years ago already

Its no secret.

Wakeup Tm

------------------

No. Ranveer is a mass star and has more acceptance with movie goers than Ranbir . If you ask anyone around you, they’ll say “Ranveer movies are fun” and “Ranbir movies are boring and brooding “

Originally posted by: HariBhari

No. Ranveer is a mass star and has more acceptance with movie goers than Ranbir . If you ask anyone around you, they’ll say “Ranveer movies are fun” and “Ranbir movies are boring and brooding “

Ranveer is a mass star??? kab kaise??

He is as much multiplex star as is Ranbir.

Ranbir is a yesteryear actor. Aise toh Amitabh Bachhan ke stardom ko Ranbir, Srk, Ranveer can't touch even now. People revere him like a god.

Ranbir's top 3 openings :

Sanju : 34 Crores

Besharam : 19 Crores

YJHD : 19 Crores

Ranveer's top 3 openings :

Simmba : 20 Crores

Gully Boy : 19 Crores

Padmaavat : 18 Crores

Originally posted by: Looney86

Ranbir's top 3 openings :

Sanju : 34 Crores

Besharam : 19 Crores

YJHD : 19 Crores

Ranveer's top 3 openings :

Simmba : 20 Crores

Gully Boy : 19 Crores

Padmaavat : 18 Crores

Even Ranbir's flop has bigger opening then Ranveer's top film lol

Originally posted by: TuHaiKaun

Sanju's success was a combination of various factors but the flops he delivered were solely because of him?

Can you read? That’s not what I said BUT we are not talking about 1-2 average flops, we are talking about titanic type of flops and he was the common factor in all of these. He only has one Sanju in his whole career. How can you justify this and still call him a bigger star compared to someone more junior who has been consistently bankable across any genres and budgets?