Save Tiger - Page 2

Originally posted by: niyati13

Whatever happened with Hrithik,Madhubala and Aishwarya..same thing is happening with him.

People r unable to see beyond his looks ( good or bad as per perspective) and his dancing skills. Uski acting par to koi Dhyaan hi nahi deta.

They don't have anything beyond their looks to look at 🤔. Don't know about Tiger Shroff

Originally posted by: BhetuPunha

They don't have anything beyond their looks to look at 🤔. Don't know about Tiger Shroff

They look so amazing that we don't want to be distracted by their acting.. otherwise they r good.

Originally posted by: ~*sindhu*~

Tiger khud bolta hai usko acting mein zyada interest nahin hai , hum kya kare. 😆 He wants to be known as an action star and dancer and thats what he works on.

Bachha naadaani kar raha hai if he wants to be female Katrina

Originally posted by: Padfoot_Prongs

I thought it was about Project Tiger to save tigers. 😆

I thought so, too.

@nyiati_13 : I know you like him and all and I am sorry to say it but he truly is wooden..so not at all comparable to the ones you mentioned about acting.

And: Tiger himself has stated he considers 'he doesn't need acting for his movies' ...and that he will concentrate on action/dance stuff and not bother with 'acting'. Really sorry but he isn't even willing to improve- so we'd never think of him as a good 'actor' if he takes that attitude..

Originally posted by: niyati13

Whatever happened with Hrithik,Madhubala and Aishwarya..same thing is happening with him.

People r unable to see beyond his looks ( good or bad as per perspective) and his dancing skills. Uski acting par to koi Dhyaan hi nahi deta.

Looks wise comparison of Tiger with Hritik , Madhubala and Aish is ridiculous.......Tiger doesn't look that good...he is just OK....while HR, MB and Aish are almost perfect when it comes to looks...

Hritik is an amazing actor...one of the best...while MB, Aish and Tiger are average actors...I don't know what you are trying to convey here.

Originally posted by: blue-ice.1

Looks wise comparison of Tiger with Hritik , Madhubala and Aish is ridiculous.......Tiger doesn't look that good...he is just OK....while HR, MB and Aish are almost perfect when it comes to looks...

Hritik is an amazing actor...one of the best...while MB, Aish and Tiger are average actors...I don't know what you are trying to convey here.

Ok so compare with Katrina?

Originally posted by: niyati13

Ok so compare with Katrina?

even Kat is better than Tiger...Zero proved that she can act....I am yet to see that for Tiger......hey I like Tiger don't get me wrong....but he is not a great looker or actor. He is brilliant in action and dancing and since he focuses on these two skills more shows that he is smart too👍🏼...better to be the master of one than being jack of all.

Tiger ko launde lapade save kar lenge, don't worry, who cares about acting in long run, its legacy.

Dharmendra is more popular than Sanjeev Kumar, John Wayne is more popular than Laurence Olivier, Marilyn Monroe is more popular than Bette Davis, Hema Malini is more popular than Nutan, Salman Khan is more popular than well most of the great actors, Katrina is more popular than Radhika Apte, Deepika is more popular than Amruta Subhash, Shahrukh Khan is more popular than Vijay Raaz, Akshay Kumar is more popular than Kay Kay Memon and so on

Acting karega tab nah dhyan denge 🤣