This post is majorly about arts and aesthetics that serve as a referential basis for KZK and it's subsequent REBOOT.
What irks me is the ‘Devdas’ domino effect that exists in the Indian audience’s identifications of a Bengali’s cultural identity? For years, Bengali literature that has gained popularity outside the language barrier has been by far Devdas majorly. This began with the EPIC portrayal of the tragic aftermath of childhood romance by Dilip Kumar on Bollywood celluloid. His nuances and the tragic love story of childhood sweethearts that were subjected to social and ego trauma.
Two souls who lived for each other and eventually suffered a tragic end. One by death, another by detesting from society due to her infidelity.
I have always believed that matters of the heart are above the laws of the land.
But, if you look at the current poster promotion, Bengalis would identify that the poster haunts of Devdas, the edits that dominated the 80’s and 90’s.
I am miffed about this panache and repertoire of churning Devadas in different ways across art forms. Why? Because a 1901 tale can be ADAPTED but not REBOOTED with the same REGRESSIVE mindset. Sharat Chandra wrote Devdas from a self-destructive mode when he was just 25. It had Paro too who was the strongest female lead in a MAN'S story!
Coming back to my point, why such obsession with Devdas and churn out this parodied version.
I wonder where are the Charulata’s, the Binodini’s, the Panther Panchali’s - The true epitome of STRONG characters?
Why churn the tragic Devdas again and again?
This is a post that is here to discuss the aesthetics of storytelling and not a war zone for WHO IS BETTER? Also, it's not BAJAJ VS ANURAG, so a humble request to everyone not to go there.
I am miffed with the early 19th century feels of this story. Why? Just why would you make suffering HALO like!!
Just one look at this poster and you’d understand what it means.
https://www.instagram.com/p/B4C2S4_FPNS/?igshid=1stfqaef7t5qo