Please don't mock - Page 5

Originally posted by: memad

Sorry, I disagree...i feel its ur conclusion based on the episode...again thats my pov and one can vary with it...

again, didn't ravan snatch rama's wife...its an analogy ppl may draw given the current...again few can find loopholes into that theory n defy it...

BUT MAIN THING TO TELL U -

that U still couldn't avoid urself from taking part in discussion after asking ppl to stop referencing abt the same....

Sorry if m in disagreement with u...but since this forum itself has become such a controversial place, ppl can view this as a free hand to comment as the mods r also doing it.

All I wanna say abt all the mods is Either Be A MOD and COMPLETELY NEUTRAL or don't be a mod and support one fandom ....

I understand u hv a huge work n responsibility....plus this work is totally voluntary n selfless from ur side...n we appreciate it as surveillance is tough job😊

apologies if i offend u, as it is not the intention 🤗

You have offended us so dont cover up and fake apologise if u have the guts to say the bit in bold provide proof as well to support yr advice to us ....abt the freehand at commenting before pting fingers look at the ones pointing to your side too.

And why cant mods comment ? Just bec it doesnt suit yr taste or your idea ?

The constant jibe at us will not be taken in like in the past dont force us to put everything out in the open and leave a section with no where to hide.

You want to target us bring proofs not imaginary interpretations!

Originally posted by: euphoric

This!

Symbols are just tanglible physical attributes to the intangible invisible existence of bonds and relationships. Absence of symbols can't negate the presence of these bonds.

Originally posted by: memad

Sorry, I disagree...i feel its ur conclusion based on the episode...again thats my pov and one can vary with it...

again, didn't ravan snatch rama's wife...its an analogy ppl may draw given the current...again few can find loopholes into that theory n defy it...

BUT MAIN THING TO TELL U -

that U still couldn't avoid urself from taking part in discussion after asking ppl to stop referencing abt the same....

Sorry if m in disagreement with u...but since this forum itself has become such a controversial place, ppl can view this as a free hand to comment as the mods r also doing it.

All I wanna say abt all the mods is Either Be A MOD and COMPLETELY NEUTRAL or don't be a mod and support one fandom ....

I understand u hv a huge work n responsibility....plus this work is totally voluntary n selfless from ur side...n we appreciate it as surveillance is tough job😊

apologies if i offend u, as it is not the intention 🤗

anyways please refer last point DEV TEAM (Forum Mods) Final Reminder To Everyone:IMPORTANT

If you find any discrepancies in moderating and have issues with mods participating in discussions , please feel free to take it to the GM Jyoti06 or admin Vijay . no one is stopping anyone from complaining against mods ... but do it through proper channel ..

offend karke phir bolte ho not to take offense , chalo on that not will not take any offense 🤗 but , let's leave the topic for discussions, any issues with our comments or moderating please take it to GM/Admin !

Originally posted by: pallawi1803

anupre performed all the sacred rituals wen pre was engaged with navu ..even after getting married to Bajaj they showed pre entering the hospital with khoon bhari taang ..as Greh pravesh...both of them are bound by their heart n no rituals can stop them from feeling wat they feel for each other ..also makers conveniently forgot about Holi marriage if dhaga was 1.5 for them😆 who knows wat fb they will show now...

Bold.. if the thread maker agrees that the marriage in the inebriated state is a valid one then pre' s marriage with Mr. B is not valid at all. Which makes anupre the official couple and are entitled to perform all the rituals together.

Originally posted by: Cute_Virgo

No no it will be papaji’s dream/nightmare 😆

Papaji brings along masiji in his dreams😆

Originally posted by: euphoric

This!

Symbols are just tanglible physical attributes to the intangible invisible existence of bonds and relationships. Absence of symbols can't negate the presence of these bonds.

Sonia I remember when Anurag said you're free he meant that he freed her from this dhaaga marriage so that the next day he can socially marry her which Prerna always wanted. Also Prerna said that she doesn't want to be freed. That clearly shows that they're bonded at heart and this deal marriage will always be something which she did against her wish to save him. So really the bonds that connect them at hearts would not break easily.

She might fulfil her end of the deal and duties but her heart still loves Anurag. So when the CVs have made a mockery out of every divine interventions so far they'll continue to do so

Originally posted by: euphoric

Papaji brings along masiji in his dreams😆

It’s a very vivid dream/nightmare 😆

Originally posted by: -RD-

You have offended us so dont cover up and fake apologise if u have the guts to say the bit in bold provide proof as well to support yr advice to us ....abt the freehand at commenting before pting fingers look at the ones pointing to your side too.

And why cant mods comment ? Just bec it doesnt suit yr taste or your idea ?

The constant jibe at us will not be taken in like in the past dont force us to put everything out in the open and leave a section with no where to hide

You want to target us bring proofs not imaginary interpretations!

BOLD BLACK - Its bcoz i have asked to edit for my comments on another thread by mods when it was not even controversial....And i had expressed my displeasure abt it n i guess u even replied to me on the same thread n other co-mods also mentioned that forum has become strict now...

RED- Please go back to the same thread and see, the mod commenting on a thing after asking ppl to stop about the same...so i just pointed out an irony...that is the proof

BLUE- This is the first time, I hv pointed out, i guess i hv freedom of expression to put forward what i hv in my mind...I m nt the one who is constantly doing it...

GREEN - We all r matured adults and there is no need for ANYONE on this forum to hide if we convey our opinions in respectful way...and THE SECTION you are talking about....are you going to take action on the whole bunch of ppl just bcoz u didn't like my comment....now m just wondering, as u commented above, am I really the one who is targeting anyone?

Originally posted by: braveheartdoc

Sonia I remember when Anurag said you're free he meant that he freed her from this dhaaga marriage so that the next day he can socially marry her which Prerna always wanted. Also Prerna said that she doesn't want to be freed. That clearly shows that they're bonded at heart and this deal marriage will always be something which she did against her wish to save him. So really the bonds that connect them at hearts would not break easily.

She might fulfil her end of the deal and duties but her heart still loves Anurag. So when the CVs have made a mockery out of every divine interventions so far they'll continue to do so

Ikr. Apne convenience pe they bring divine interventions.

And its abt two ppl if they believe strings of heart bind them, marriage is simply a ritual tht solemnize the union of that couple. It celebrates their companionship. And when ur heart is nt into it a marriage, thn its a burden or obligation, nothing more. No wonder veena called it a bhayanak shaadi

Originally posted by: euphoric

This!

Symbols are just tanglible physical attributes to the intangible invisible existence of bonds and relationships. Absence of symbols can't negate the presence of these bonds.

so beautifully explained