I often see on this forum that people have issues with cinematic liberty saying that its not "realistic" or that its "too much"....but what I want to know is.....issue kya hai? Every movie requires some form of cinematic liberty otherwise kaisa chalega?
You cant have things be realistic every time, and then there are those people who see the slightest unrealistic thing and start panicking over "how could they" show this in a movie. Its so annoying, have a tequila shot and calm down please.
So what if they showed something unrealistic in a movie? Did you come to write some kind of test or something, just sit there and watch it. Nobody is coming to see realism. If you want real, then go outside for a walk or something, why are you coming to a movie looking for reality? Escapism is a huge part of cinema - especially in Bollywood.
Whether its Jaadoo or PK or Ranbir in Sanju - I believe in all of these cinematic creatures.. Whats next you want me to stop imagining also? Tomorrow if I want to have a sapiosexual relation with Jaddoo then what will you say? You cant stop me and you shouldnt.
I have enjoyed lots of unrealistic things - I mean the biggest cinematic liberty is Alia Bhatt merely for the fact that she even gets casted in movies despite look like a 12 year old. What can be a bigger liberty than that? Having a pre-teen looking girl playing mature women on screen. Or that someone like Ranbir can be an actor despite the size of his nose?
4