Why do TV actors fail on big screen? - Page 9

Tusshar Kapoor is a product of nepotism. Comparing sushant with Tusshar. 😆

Nways this particular person is nothing but a troll. She does this on every forum to get attention. So it pointless to get into any kind of discussion with her.

She has bashed that child actor despite the successful career of that child actor and bashed that character of that child actor who just wanted to get father s love. This is probably her way of getting attention.

Innitially we were not aware of this but some other members made her aware about the same.

Originally posted by: tanvismile

Tusshar Kapoor is a product of nepotism. Comparing sushant with Tusshar. 😆

Nways this particular person is nothing but a troll. She does this on every forum to get attention. So it pointless to get into any kind of discussion with her.

She has bashed that child actor despite the successful career of that child actor and bashed that character of that child actor who just wanted to get father s love. This is probably her way of getting attention.

Doesn't matter if he's a product of nepotism. Reality is your example of Sushant wasn't right and overexposure does causes problem for TV actors in Bollywood. If you want to argue with me on that then fine, but calling me troll will not make your points look valid.

I agree that I've done trolling on TV forums, and yes I've done it on KKB forum too but I'm not trolling here.

Sushant is certainly not a failed actor. Having two flop films in ur career doesn't make u a failed actor. The rest are hits and semi hits average..Overall He has good filmography established himself in bollywood purely based on talent. Plus He is getting more films.

Coming to tusshar then Abhishek then uday chorpra.... These people passed their prime.... Now It's almost like their second innings in bollywood. Comparing them with sushant is foolish. Plus these people are still getting to do more work because of their connections.

Nways this is last post on this topic. I m done with this topic. I will not go round and round about the same.

Originally posted by: tanvismile

Sushant is certainly not a failed actor. Having two flop films in ur career doesn't make u a failed actor. The rest are hits and semi hits average..Overall He has good filmography established himself in bollywood purely based on talent. Plus He is getting more films.

Coming to tusshar then Abhishek then uday chorpra.... These people passed their prime.... Now It's almost like their second innings in bollywood. Comparing them with sushant is foolish. Plus these people are still getting to do more work because of their connections.

Nways this is last post on this topic. I m done with this topic. I will not go round and round about the same.

Sushant has two flops and one disaster with Raabta. His only credible hit is SDR, which isn't that big of a hit either, and he has done total 7 films until now. His good filmography or him getting good projects is nothing to do with him being overexposed.

And btw, I quoted you because you were indirectly challenging my stance that overexposure doesn't harm TV actors. So don't think that I'm asking for attention from you.

Tushar se comparison isliye kiya because even he has survived. My point being that surviving doesn't equate to success. Whether its star kids or outsiders, everyone needs connections to survive. First understand what people are saying before calling them foolish.

Sushant singh rajput has given three hits Shudh desi romance Dhoni Kedarnath then kai po che semi hit.... Then He is associated with blockbuster that's was cameo role... Doing seven films in 7 years.... Definitely not a failed actor.... His hits flops has nothing to do with his overexposure due to successful career on TV. If script isn't strong enough films doesn't work. But that's nothing to do with his performances.Infact he is great performer be it acting dancing.

Tusshar is no more seen as solo film hero. He is getting multistarcast films... like Golmal series.... It's more like ajay film with Tusshar in supporting role

Ofcourse nepotism performances verdict of films span of years in industry everything matters before u judge any actor...I stand by my opinion.

Because majority of the TV actors who wants to be n Bollywood are poor actors, Barun and KSG both left TV with a hooplah and swore to never return and just look at them. Barun flopped with IPK3 whereas KSG is wooden and just boring as Bajaj, I was amazed to see KSG not even trying to emote in Kasauti, the show is not even fetching the TRPs which it was fetching before the Bajaj track.

Rajeev Khandelwal is an exceptional case, a very talented and smart actor, may be that is why even though he failed in Bollywood, he has always made some bold choices in TV and been successful in it. Also, not to forget his web series like Haq se was one of the best from AltBalaji.

Sushant was doing well unless he started choosing bad films, he can still make a come back.

Originally posted by: tanvismile

Sushant singh rajput has given three hits Shudh desi romance Dhoni Kedarnath then kai po che semi hit.... Then He is associated with blockbuster that's was cameo role... Doing seven films in 7 years.... Definitely not a failed actor.... His hits flops has nothing to do with his overexposure due to successful career on TV. If script isn't strong enough films doesn't work. But that's nothing to do with his performances.Infact he is great performer be it acting dancing.

Tusshar is no more seen as solo film hero. He is getting multistarcast films... like Golmal series.... It's more like ajay film with Tusshar in supporting role

Ofcourse nepotism performances verdict of films span of years in industry everything matters before u judge any actor...I stand by my opinion.

I thought you had your last post on this thread.😆You can quote me. I'll not bite you.😆

Kedarnath was AVERAGE. Not a clean hit. See the link :

https://boxofficeindia.com/report-details.php?articleid=4698

You can't give credit to Sushant for MSD and PK lmao...because his solo films don't earn that much. So his only hit where he can get CREDIT is SDR.

If his hits and flops have NOTHING to do with overexposure, then why were you making a claim of Pavitra Rishta being a BIG HIT on television? Think before what you're saying.

So what if he's in multistarrers? He has survived right? Even if its nepotism. Outsiders survive too because of connections and favoritism. So Tushar too is successful by your logic.

Originally posted by: Luna46

I thought you had your last post on this thread.😆You can quote me. I'll not bite you.😆

Kedarnath was AVERAGE. Not a clean hit. See the link :

https://boxofficeindia.com/report-details.php?articleid=4698

You can't give credit to Sushant for MSD and PK lmao...because his solo films don't earn that much. So his only hit where he can get CREDIT is SDR.

If his hits and flops have NOTHING to do with overexposure, then why were you making a claim of Pavitra Rishta being a BIG HIT on television? Think before what you're saying.

So what if he's in multistarrers? He has survived right? Even if its nepotism. Outsiders survive too because of connections and favoritism. So Tushar too is successful by your logic.

kedarnath is a hit.... Budget of 30 crore while collection in domestic market is 86 crore and collection in foreign market is 11 crore... plus most importantly his acting and his chemistry with sara have been praised.But u will not give him credit rather go to search negative regarding the film to prove ur point. Even if agree to the verdict u posted then also it wasn't a flop.... Dhoni is hit.... The verdict matters right. ..but U will conveniently ignore it... because it doesn't suit ur narrative. According to u even tusshar Kapoor performs Dhoni it would be a hit isn't it... Does performance even matter to u... vivek Oberoi performed modi... The film is trash and so his performance.... One has to be convincing enough in terms of performance to get in shoes of person who is loved by audiences...

Tusshar Kapoor survived? how? he will survive for life because he has entire family in bollywood. Still today he can't get solo films means producers are not ready to invest because they don't think the film can be sold on his name while sushant is capable of getting films where he is hero which means he is able to draw public to theatres. That too coming from outside but yay that doesn't matter... U will not give him credit. there but the first one to take away the credit....

U never gave credit to the child akriti who received so many awards n appreciation for her acting u never gave credit to her for that rather blamed directors for hiring her to play kulfi character.

U will never give credit to anyone because u don't want to.... So On what basis are u declaring ur points as valid.... What kind of discussion u r engaging... So ya u trolling...

Pavitra rista was definitely a hit. As a bollywood actor he has delivered hit films to his credit.... praise worthy performances .. Raabta was disaster but sushant proved himself as a competent actor... Nobody could save that movie because it was a bad film. So yes successful overexposed tv actor doesn't mean u can't succeed in bollywood. An actor can have successful career in both television and bollywood.

Only TV actors who did successful transition to BW are SRK, Vidya Balan, SSR, Rajeev K, Vikrant Massey, Yami G, etc.

Originally posted by: Swetha-Sai

Only TV actors who did successful transition to BW are SRK, Vidya Balan, SSR, Rajeev K, Vikrant Massey, Yami G, etc.

👍🏼 There is no role for success... Here U become successful so there u will a flop.. 😆 bullshit theory. Instead they deserve appreciation because despite tv stars being looked down upon they still did it.