Strategy confusions

Originally posted by: iluvmandy

Depends on the task given. This task was different than the snake task . Judges dont go and mingle around and do planning and plotting, judges dont bring their personal agendas in between . judges dont decide the faisla even before hearing

Originally posted by: Dedhshana

Was it the real panchayat and is Jasleen a real sarpanch. Its a game afterall and contestants are just playing a role. When they finally know that it all boils down to captain-contendership, they will obviously keep their long term survival in mind and act accordingly. Its still a strategy.

Originally posted by: iluvmandy

But it also depends on where and when to use the strategy and what kind of stategy. In this particular task the things which were not required were rightly addressed by salman . And all dumb acts tht jasleen needed to be highlighted . It was quite visible .

Originally posted by: Dedhshana

I am unable to understand when and how does BB host decide that some action in the task is a good strategy and should be applauded and when a relatively similar action becomes a stupidity and needs to be thrashed. Does it depend on the action or on the person taking the action.

For example: Rohit betrayed his blue team in the snake task. He was applauded and his betrayal was termed as a strategy to help his friends win. In sarpanch task Megha asked Jasleen to favour them so that their group of friends win. Jasleen acted accordingly but the host decided that this action is worthy of thrashing.

Someone please tell me why?