Bollywoodlaver thumbnail
6th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#1
Courtesan I guess
Edited by Bollywoodlaver - 6 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

18

Views

3.5k

Users

6

Likes

17

Frequent Posters

srilotus thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago
#2
Courtesan I guess.I actually don't know whether Anarkali koi thi bhi ki nahi.
Bollywoodlaver thumbnail
6th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: srilotus

Courtesan I guess.I actually don't know whether Anarkali koi thi bhi ki nahi.


it is a fictional story
Rope_of_Hope thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago
#4
I think she is courtesan but i have read it was purely fictional so they have the liberty to show her as a courtesan or a servant
myviewprem thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 6 years ago
#5
she was a rakassa
rakassa means in modern times tawaif like that

some european travellers have written about anarkali

William Finch was a Londoner who secured a job with the East India Company. He landed at Surat along with the famous Captain William Hawkins on 24th August 1608. He spent four years in India and wrote extensively about his observations. Finch joined Hawkins in Agra, travelling from Surat, on 14th April 1610. From Agra he went to Biyana to buy indigo for the East India Company. From there he proceeded to Lahore arriving there in February 1611 and it is at Lahore that he heard of the accounts of Anarkali which went into his journal.

William Finch reached Lahore in February 1611 (only eleven years after the supposed death of Anarkali), to sell the indigo he had purchased at Bayana on behalf of the East India Company. His account, written in early seventeenth century English, gives the following information:

In the suburbs of the town, a fair monument for Prince Daniyal and his mother, one of the Akbar's wives, with whom it is said Prince Salim had a liaison. Upon the notice of the affair, King Akbar caused the lady to be enclosed within a wall of his palace, where she died. The King Jahangir, in token of his love, ordered a magnificent tomb of stone to be built in the midst of a walled four-square garden provided with a gate. The body of the tomb, the emperor willed to be wrought in work of gold...


However, it appears that Prince Daniyal's mother died in 1596 as per historical records and not in 1599. So, was Finch correct about the lady's identity? But could Finch have written anything other that what he was told then by others?

Now, let us turn our attention to the other British traveler Edward Terry.

Edward Terry did his M.A. in 1614 and became a Church priest. He came to India to work as chaplain to Sir Thomas Roe. He travelled in India and wrote "Voyage to East India, 1616-19.

Let me quote here excepts from Internet browsing as to alleged observations of Rev. Edward Terry:

QUOTE No.1

Edward Terry who visited a few years after William Finch writes that Akbar had threatened to disinherit Jahangir, for his liaison with Anarkali, the emperor's most beloved wife. But on his death-bed, Akbar repealed it.


Another ambassdor to court says Salim was 19 years old when salim had affair with anarkali

Even rajasthani books say salim was in exile in bala fort for a year almost in his eraly 20s that was also may be because of his affair akbar had sent him away on exile from mughal court

So anarkali existed but mughal documents did not write about it for obious reasonzs


Edited by myviewprem - 6 years ago
Rope_of_Hope thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: myviewprem

she was a rakassa

rakassa means in modern times tawaif like that

some european travellers have written about anarkali

William Finch was a Londoner who secured a job with the East India Company. He landed at Surat along with the famous Captain William Hawkins on 24th August 1608. He spent four years in India and wrote extensively about his observations. Finch joined Hawkins in Agra, travelling from Surat, on 14th April 1610. From Agra he went to Biyana to buy indigo for the East India Company. From there he proceeded to Lahore arriving there in February 1611 and it is at Lahore that he heard of the accounts of Anarkali which went into his journal.

William Finch reached Lahore in February 1611 (only eleven years after the supposed death of Anarkali), to sell the indigo he had purchased at Bayana on behalf of the East India Company. His account, written in early seventeenth century English, gives the following information:

In the suburbs of the town, a fair monument for Prince Daniyal and his mother, one of the Akbar's wives, with whom it is said Prince Salim had a liaison. Upon the notice of the affair, King Akbar caused the lady to be enclosed within a wall of his palace, where she died. The King Jahangir, in token of his love, ordered a magnificent tomb of stone to be built in the midst of a walled four-square garden provided with a gate. The body of the tomb, the emperor willed to be wrought in work of gold...


However, it appears that Prince Daniyal's mother died in 1596 as per historical records and not in 1599. So, was Finch correct about the lady's identity? But could Finch have written anything other that what he was told then by others?

Now, let us turn our attention to the other British traveler Edward Terry.

Edward Terry did his M.A. in 1614 and became a Church priest. He came to India to work as chaplain to Sir Thomas Roe. He travelled in India and wrote "Voyage to East India, 1616-19.

Let me quote here excepts from Internet browsing as to alleged observations of Rev. Edward Terry:

QUOTE No.1

Edward Terry who visited a few years after William Finch writes that Akbar had threatened to disinherit Jahangir, for his liaison with Anarkali, the emperor's most beloved wife. But on his death-bed, Akbar repealed it.


Another ambassdor to court says Salim was 19 years old when salim had affair with anarkali

Even rajasthani books say salim was in exile in bala fort for a year almost in his eraly 20s that was also may be because of his affair akbar had sent him away on exile from mughal court

So anarkali existed but mughal documents did not write about it for obious reasonzs



amazing dear..thanks for the update..you did so much research i think😊

myviewprem thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 6 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: Agrata23


amazing dear..thanks for the update..you did so much research i think😊



its all given in various boooks
Bollywoodlaver thumbnail
6th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#8
did any book say that she was with salim? because I think that part is most definitely fictional!
srilotus thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: Bollywoodlaver

did any book say that she was with salim? because I think that part is most definitely fictional!

There is no pakka proof of Anarkali's existence.So I still believe that Anarkali is fictional as nobody has ever written about her and Salim .
Bollywoodlaver thumbnail
6th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: srilotus


There is no pakka proof of Anarkali's existence.So I still believe that Anarkali is fictional as nobody has ever written about her and Salim .



Yeh it is most probably fiction!

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".