Comeon guys! Pari is only a child! - Page 2

Originally posted by: T3ja

Just like Pari, Mishti is also a child. Then why is she not blabbering of not sharing her mother with anyone? Why they are showing Pari's insecurity. Why Mishti is shown helping others? Why not Pari? Many hate to even take Nandini's name at this point. Then why they are dragging a little kid into this mess?

Because they are clearly and intentionally trying to draw a comparison to the girls and their respective mothers, and that's why I'm annoyed at these writers. Show kids as kids, instead of doing these manipulative and distorted portrayals of children just for the sake of drama. Children in no way talk like that and I know this having done 2 years of work experience with children in early years settings with 0-8 year olds and having so many little cousins. No child uses such words and dialogues when talking in a possessive manner even. They're intentionally trying to show the girls as little versions of their mothers. Why can't the children have their own personality beyond showing them like their mother just to make the show unnecessarily dramatic.

Originally posted by: kashishrocks

See all the kids are not same. Everyone has their own way of talking and behaving. You can't compare one kid with another. It also depends on the environment they get at home. As Mishti has been in a family, she has learned good habits from them. Pari only has a father who cannot be with her whole day. So from where will she learn all that? If u have siblings, you can ask your parents, that were u and your siblings the same in childhood? I am sure their answer will differ. I am just giving an example.

The main point is about the wordings and dialogues of the child. No child no matter what at such a young age says such things because writers intentionally want to show the child like a mini version of her mother which makes zero sense.

Originally posted by: ButterflyChaser

I am a teacher too and with time i realized that we adults always think children are unintelligent and they blabber anything but that's not true... Deep inside there is always a reason for their every action. Pari's talk about sharing father was unnecessary as there wasn't a situation where she feels that mishti will ask for her father or neither she has seen any such situation(my assumption). So, it's clear that writers are trying to show her similarities with nandini and that's what people are talking about.

Apart from that what i feel is, Kunal and Pari doesn't have very good relationship or Kunal isn't a loving father which made pari a little insecure and she constanlty tries to reassure herself that kunal lovea her a lot. And in that fear she blabbered that she won't share kunal knd took the promise.

Anyways, i don't think writers went into that deep and they just gave those dialogues to pari for future reference where mishti might sacrifices her father coz of the promise.

Exactly! Children are incredibly smart and fast learners as is my 2 year old cousin, but children speak their thoughts according to a situation yet like you said there was no situation present where pari needed to speak so possessively about her father with a friend and take such a promise that no child in reality ever does. Children are smart but don't say and act in ways that are completely uncharacteristic of their age group and react and feel like adults would especially when it's out of sync with the present situation. That dialogue was forced and seemed completely out of place both on the girl and in that situation and that's why people of this forum are complaining.