Posted:
I just hate this concept of using kids to narrate a certain POV. The introductory scene where Mishti was consoling all the scared children was too OTT. She is just a five-year old; you can show her caring nature some other way. In ITV, why are children given grown-up characteristics? 😕
And for Pari, have you ever heard a five-year old talk about how my dad would get a heart attack if something happened to me? Why does she have to say that dialogue. Instead, it would have been better if a teacher or some other adult narrated to Mauli that yes, we know Pari's father and I am sure he would be too concerned for her. Or the weird scene of her entering Mauli's house with red footprint? Or things like I don't give my papa to anyone? Or talking about how her papa is so handsome? Kids just don't say stuff like that 😕
I remember in YHM where a five-year-old Ruhi would talk about Ishita not being a "baanjh" and that sounded so wrong on so many levels. Why does a child need to convey this message in the show? Which child talks like that in real life? Why couldn't they have a grown-up portray the same message?
Why are children given grown-up dialogues just to progress the story? There being kids is enough of a progression in story, they don't need to become adult-like characters. Have you guys seen the interviews with the two kids, where they really aren't sure what's happening and are just playing around? That is what kids are like; they are not mini-adults like ITV portrays 😕
