I am with you on all of this, bar the last para.
As for Porus, the problem is that his supporters WANT a lily white character, like the traditional hero in the old films. They would be uncomfortable with a complex, street smart, devious Porus of the kind Chanakya would have wanted.
So, when Porus IS devious, as when he makes a night raid on the Farsi camp, or when Bamni lays a trap over a chasm for Alexander to fall into, or when Porus drags Olympias to the edge of a cliff, threatens Alexander with her death, and demands Ambhiraj as the ransom for Olympias, in true kidnapper style, they are flummoxed and dismayed.
But this doesn't make them criticise Porus, as I did with Alexander after the bull and the Ambhikumar episodes, and the way he treated Ambhikumar's mother. Except, to some extent, my dear Surbhi, whose innate sense of justice struggles with her loyalties and preferences.
Here lies the crux of the problem. And the reason for their repeated retreats to condemning Alexander on moral grounds and blanking out the dubious things Porus does, even while claiming total moral superiority.
There is no point in saying thar Alexander does it, so why not Porus? If Porus is to be a lily white, flawless, piece of perfection, it follows that he has to be held to the highest standards. And when he fails, he has to be condemned, just as I condemned Alexander and dubbed Olympias a monster.
To come to your final para, I find it strange that you, with your energetic quartet, feel that you need breathing space. Why? You are in an overwhelming majority in this pathetic excuse for a forum. Why would you feel boxed in? I can think of perfectly good reasons for you to quit the forum, but this is not one of them!
Yes, I have heard complaints that the PR group does not want to participate in the forum because of the overwhelming presence of the Alexander group. Which seems to me less than convincing.
Team Alexander has never been more than 8 strong, and there was nothing to prevent the PR group from starting a lot of threads in which they could praise Porus. But such threads are very rare. Surbhi started a couple, in which I was the main responder. Deepthi (daphnejasmine) wrote one, but she did not even come back to it to respond to such comments as there were.
I don't know about what happened during the first four months, but this is what I have seen since I came in on March 31 last. It could not have been much better seeing that till.today, this forum has only 78 pages, of which almost half must be due to luckysnow's frenetic thread opening!
The Jodha Akbar forum, which is still alive and kicking over three years since the show ended, has over 1800 pages! When I was there, it already had over a 1000 pages. There were always strong conflicts between the Jodhaphiles (80%) and the Jalalphiles, but neither quit. They stayed and propounded their respective views vigorously
There is no point complaining that you are crowded out when you don't exert yourself. Or state that you know nothing about history. When you watch a historical, one should try to gain at least a modicum of knowledge about the period and the happenings it deals with. The net is there for those who don't want to plough through books.
I wanted a different Porus and, of late, a different Alexander. I quit because I could not stand what was on offer. But so long aa I was there, despite my preference for Rohit's Alexander, I did try to be objective, and slammed him when I hated what he did. The same for Porus, though I wrote very little about him.
If we could all have striven for a reasonable level of objectivity, we could have had wonderful discussions in a lively, non-confrontational forum. But that was not to be, more is the pity.
Well, I am exhausted .This is it for today and probably tomorrow.
Shyamala Aunty