Desimartini calls 'Shahid' and 'Kareena's performances UNDERWHELMING

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

Jahnvi

@adoreyou

Dazzler

Posted: 7 years ago

#11

I kinda agree with that , Kareena's perforance was overshadowed by Swara. But not that i didnt enjoy her presence.

Actually Swara & Shikha both were better than Kareena IMO

Shahid looked fine but i feel Ranveer overshadowed shahid , purely because of poor writing , they gave too many scenes to Allauddin followed by Padmavati and at last Ratan Singh so it was quite natural i guess.

Besides they suddenly got Padmavati-Ratan Singh married , which looked odd , it was partly because they removed the " Nainowale Ne " song in between , so I as a viewer was clueless at the sudden marriage , that song would have added some substance to their story .

Harshvardhan should quit acting i suppose , BW audience has royally ignored him.

Didnt watch others so no idea.

Quote

Hiruni

@CDlove

Rocker

+ 8

Posted: 7 years ago

#12

Agreed about Kareena. She had a disinterested air about her in VDW.

Not too sure about Shahid. I think the role was written that way so he couldn't do much after a certain point. Feels like he got the short end of the stick in this case. I thought his performance was restrained and I actually liked it compared to the OTTness of the rest of the movie.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

maal_u_have

@maal_u_have

Dazzler

Posted: 7 years ago

#13

Originally posted by: RheaSingh
Ishaan Khattar in Beyond the Clouds: Critics are calling this as the weakest Majid Majidi film yeat and many singled out Ishaan Khattar's (in his debut) performance as the weak point of the film.

I am really curious which review called Ishaan the weak point of the film?? Nearly every review was raving about him or praised his effort, so mentioning him is hella weird.

Quote

TheJake

@TheJake

Sparkler

+ 6

Posted: 7 years ago

#14

Yep, back in the days Rajput women were so advanced; they could edit childs seeds --- Rajput mothers had to have Rajput men as tall, dark and handsome and they all were.

Quote

nonam

@nonam

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 7 years ago

#15

shahid and deepika were actually the watchable parts of padmavati

Quote

rimi10

@rimi10

Voyager

Posted: 7 years ago

#16

Originally posted by: pakeezah
Dunno about others but Ishaan weak? And Shahid whom IF fers were saying acted better than Ranveer? And no mention of Sonam whom everyone said irritated in VDW?
Is this writer a bonafide journo?

A 10 year old ?

Has something against the Pankaj Kapur sons?

Or mad dog bit him or her?

Or all four?

I would say writer has something against Neelima Azim's sons, Ishaan is not Pankaj Kapur's son.

Quote

sia

@Serendipity..

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 7 years ago

#17

I disagree on Kareena, shahid and Ishaan parts.
I think shahid was good in Padmavat. He did justice to his role.

And same with Kareena in VDW, I liked her the best out of the lot. She has great screen presence!
Coming to Ishaan, most of the reviews I read had praised him so I'm not sure which review mentioned him as the weakest link.