LOST IN CASE 3.1.26
STRUCK IN CASE 4.1.26
7 year leap for Yeh Rishta
Lokah fame Kalyani Priyadarshan cast opp Ranveer in Pralay
Chipka chipki 🙄🙄
Kjo to direct a grand family drama for his next movie
Happy 300 Manvikians.....
I'm loving Munni-Hrithik encounters and pair
Deepika Padukone’s 40th birthday celebration thread
How Many More Indo Pak Movies Will Be Made
Originally posted by: LawlessLawyer
Oh yeah Aristotle ko bhi bhaga diya😆
Lagta hai Alexander bechara pyaar main deewaana hogaya tha🤣I remember that old movie Sikandar which had Prithviraj Kapoor.Wahan pe pehle scene main hi Aristotle ne aake Alexander ko bol diya ki kisi bhi ladki ke chakkar main mat padna😆😉
Originally posted by: deepikagupta9
I feel pity on those person's thinking who blame a woman 4 a man's failure
People say kaise ek aurat nai Mahabharat karva diPeople blame mostly Draupadi 4 Mahabharat war but truth is Draupadi's insult was last nail 2 d coffin, mahabharat happened coz many reasons but blame on comes on DraupadiPeople remember Prithviraj's valour but they blame sanyogita 4 his failure, what wrong this sanyogita did , it was Prithviraj foolishness 4 forgiving MD. Gori again & again, sanyogita dint made Prithviraj forgave GoriAlexander's people hated roxxane why coz Alex started favouring her relatives , spending most of d time with her , she was not royal . Alexander was not a foolish man who can came in anyone's words so easily, he was a very gud politician & general, then why 2 blame roxxane 4 alexander's decisions. Roxxane dint forced alexander 2 marry her or favour her relatives. Alexander had a very strong control on himself in terms of women, it was not like he fall 4 every beautiful women, roxxane definately had something in her which made alex marry her.People say roxxane killed stateira but Can anyone say if opportunity given 2 stateira she would had not harmed roxxane & her child. Cassandra also did same 2 Olympias & roxxane 4 power.In every era women has 2 be blamed 4 d decisions taken by men's of that era.
Originally posted by: sashashyam
I am glad I don't have to do the Chanakya note, my dear Surbhi, though I would have enjoyed summarising it all for you. I am being so ill disciplined as it is!😆I must tell you, however, that your summing up of all that you have learnt about him is truly admirable. Very crisp and neat!It is not at all sure how he died. One version is that he was doing sadhana on a mound, the lower parts of which were full of cow dung. One of his enemies - and he must have had any number of them- set fire to the dung heap.As Chanakya was in a state of deep meditation, he did not realise this till it was too late for him to do anything about it.If I know anything about him, he would never have regretted anything he did. He was totally detached, and he did what he did for a greater goal, nishkaama karma. Once the goal was realised, he retreated to his ashram.One last point, for I can never stop analysing - it comes of 38 years as a diplomat doing poltiical analyses day in and day out.😉 The Persians would surely have killed Roxanne the first chance they got, so as to get primacy for Barsine and the child she was supposed to be expecting. Preventive measures, so to speak. They would not have waited for Roxanne to kill Barsine. But as things turned out, she struck first.As for karma coming back to haunt people in this life itself, Stalin and Mao killed millions of their own countrymen in the Soviet Gulag and in the 1959 Great Leap Forward and the 1969 Cultural Revolution movements in China, far , far more than Alexander ever killed. Yet both of them died comfortably in their beds! Hitler comfortably shot himself in his underground bunker in Berlin as the Allied troops were closing in on him in the summer of 1945. Poor Alexander, however , suffered such agony before he died. See the parapaksh on the part of niyati?Shyamala Aunty
Originally posted by: myviewprem
@bold.AuntyMajority great killers die a peacful death and their families all live happily atleast in 20-21st century. Look at Stalin, Mao, Hitler etc like you said. Even Gaddafi, Osama Bin Laden, Pol pot, saddam Hussein family(atleast girls) all living in luxury after their death. Because in 21st century we do not tend to put blame of a humans grave sins on his family members.But it was not the case in BC. People were terrified of soutens and their kids may be. Like that mughals would kill male competitors but leave the females alive. Even in rajputhana the males would kill, their family especially girls could live after war defeat or after killing king etc. So even in 15th century family was allowed to live by enemy especially girls.
Originally posted by: sashashyam
I am glad I don't have to do the Chanakya note, my dear Surbhi, though I would have enjoyed summarising it all for you. I am being so ill disciplined as it is!😆I must tell you, however, that your summing up of all that you have learnt about him is truly admirable. Very crisp and neat!It is not at all sure how he died. One version is that he was doing sadhana on a mound, the lower parts of which were full of cow dung. One of his enemies - and he must have had any number of them- set fire to the dung heap.As Chanakya was in a state of deep meditation, he did not realise this till it was too late for him to do anything about it.If I know anything about him, he would never have regretted anything he did. He was totally detached, and he did what he did for a greater goal, nishkaama karma. Once the goal was realised, he retreated to his ashram.One last point, for I can never stop analysing - it comes of 38 years as a diplomat doing poltiical analyses day in and day out.😉 The Persians would surely have killed Roxanne the first chance they got, so as to get primacy for Barsine and the child she was supposed to be expecting. Preventive measures, so to speak. They would not have waited for Roxanne to kill Barsine. But as things turned out, she struck first.As for karma coming back to haunt people in this life itself, Stalin and Mao killed millions of their own countrymen in the Soviet Gulag and in the 1959 Great Leap Forward and the 1969 Cultural Revolution movements in China, far , far more than Alexander ever killed. Yet both of them died comfortably in their beds! Hitler comfortably shot himself in his underground bunker in Berlin as the Allied troops were closing in on him in the summer of 1945. Poor Alexander, however , suffered such agony before he died. See the parapaksh on the part of niyati?Shyamala Aunty
Originally posted by: sashashyam
My dear Prem,It is good to see you again.I was citing not so much the families of the great mass murderers - Stalin, Hitler, Mao and the rest - as the main perpetrators themselves. Then and now, they mostly escaped.What you have noted regarding medieval war traditions was true. Ultimately, it was all dog eat dog, kill or be killed.By the way, you have mentioned in the other post that the Emperor Akbars sister was married to Alexanders relative's son. Which sister was this, and what kind of relative of Alexander's? There must have been at least 80-90 generations between the two, how did they keep track of the Alexander connection.Another point, I think Bactria was bordering modern Afghanistan, not part of it. So I don't think Roxanne was Indian. In any case, trust the CVs not to miss the Roxanne-Puru rakhi tying ceremony when Alexander comes to India, which must, since they have cashiered the battle of Gaugamela, one of Alexander's most brilliant tactical victories, be coming up soon.Shyamala Aunty