Rajeev Masand and Anupama Chopra = Horrible - Page 2

I actually like them. I do believe they are very thoughtful, balanced and try to give a detailed review. That being said I do acknowledge that they are critics from the "classes". While they are able to comment on acting, pacing, script, direction, editing etc - their understanding of "entertainment value" is poor. They don't acknowledge films that have entertaining packages that entertain the masses.

I only watch their interviews with stars and that's about it. Be it Masand or Anupama or Kunal Guha or Rahul Desai, every single critics these days give out spoilers in their reviews. The film starts like this, in the middle this happens, there is this dialogue, this is how it ends...I mean why the f**k are they even calling themselves critics when they sound like the spoiler section of an IMDB page?? I read a review of regional film a while back in a reputed newspaper and they have literally given every single detail of the film including locations and climax in the review!

Haven't seen anupama's recent reviews but her opinions arent the same as masand. Unlike the latter, she doesn't thrash all "masala" films.. She actually manages to review films within the context of their genre more often than masand